IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v202y2020ics0951832020305457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of nitrogen for fire safety application in aircraft

Author

Listed:
  • Dinesh, A.
  • Benson, C.M.
  • Holborn, P.G.
  • Sampath, S.
  • Xiong, Y.

Abstract

Fire suppression is an important safety certification requirement for aircraft as it is for all safety critical systems. Risk analyses are required at the design and certification stages to determine the probabilities and means of mitigating such risks. Apostolakis et al. (1995) shows an approach for spacecraft, Spyrou and Koromila (2020) for passenger ships and Arshi et al. (2010) for reactors. An important analysis tool for aircraft is the Zonal Analysis process (Chen and Fielding, 2018) Such analyses include investigation of means of fire suppression for which the use of Halon 1301 was a popular choice. The production of Halon and several halocarbons were banned under the Montreal Protocol in 1994, which necessitates an investigation for use of environmental-friendly agents for this application. The primary objective of this paper is to determine the ‘design concentration’11Design concentration is the volumetric concentration of the agent to achieve successful fire suppression in an enclosure. of nitrogen required for fire suppression. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), in combination with experimental verification is described in this paper. The air flow rate in the cup-burner model was varied between 10 L/min and 40 L/min for a low-speed numerical model and was validated against the BS ISO 14520 cup burner test (BS ISO 14520 Annex, 2006) to determine the extinguishing concentration of nitrogen. The study revealed that the design concentration of nitrogen was 34% (14% oxygen concentration). Further investigation suggested that at low air flow rates (10 L/min and 20 L/min case), distortions produced in the flow led to erroneous measurement of oxygen concentration in experiments. The fire suppression model was extended to an n-heptane pool fire in a large enclosure. The recorded design concentration was approximately 39% additional nitrogen corresponding to 13% oxygen concentration by volume. It was observed that the weight of nitrogen required increased by 7.5 times compared to Halon 1301 use for this model. Future work can be explored in aircraft cargo and engine bay fire safety systems through Minimum Performance Standard (MPS) testing and simulations with nitrogen as the agent. Such work will feed directly into system safety assessments during the early design stages, where analyses must precede testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinesh, A. & Benson, C.M. & Holborn, P.G. & Sampath, S. & Xiong, Y., 2020. "Performance evaluation of nitrogen for fire safety application in aircraft," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305457
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020305457
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spyrou, Kostas J. & Koromila, Ioanna A., 2020. "A risk model of passenger ship fire safety and its application," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Safaei Arshi, Saiedeh & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Sepanloo, Kamran, 2010. "Coupling CFAST fire modeling and SAPHIRE probabilistic assessment software for internal fire safety evaluation of a typical TRIGA research reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 166-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfarizi, Muhammad Gibran & Ustolin, Federico & Vatn, Jørn & Yin, Shen & Paltrinieri, Nicola, 2023. "Towards accident prevention on liquid hydrogen: A data-driven approach for releases prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Zhao, Xian & Dong, Bingbing & Wang, Xiaoyue, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a two-dimensional voting system equipped with protective devices considering triggering failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Song, Chengcheng & Shao, Quan & Zhu, Pei & Dong, Min & Yu, Wenfei, 2023. "An emergency aircraft evacuation simulation considering passenger overtaking and luggage retrieval," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Mauro, Francesco & Vassalos, Dracos & Paterson, Donald, 2022. "Critical damages identification in a multi-level damage stability assessment framework for passenger ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Ruponen, Pekka & Montewka, Jakub & Tompuri, Markus & Manderbacka, Teemu & Hirdaris, Spyros, 2022. "A framework for onboard assessment and monitoring of flooding risk due to open watertight doors for passenger ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Dorota Łozowicka, 2021. "The design of the arrangement of evacuation routes on a passenger ship using the method of genetic algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Wang, Xinjian & Xia, Guoqing & Zhao, Jian & Wang, Jin & Yang, Zaili & Loughney, Sean & Fang, Siming & Zhang, Shukai & Xing, Yongheng & Liu, Zhengjiang, 2023. "A novel method for the risk assessment of human evacuation from cruise ships in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Weiliang Qiao & Yang Liu & Xiaoxue Ma & He Lan, 2021. "Cognitive Gap and Correlation of Safety-I and Safety-II: A Case of Maritime Shipping Safety Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Kowal, Karol & Torabi, Mina, 2021. "Failure mode and reliability study for Electrical Facility of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.