IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v202y2020ics0951832020305329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognosticating RULs while exploiting the future characteristics of operating profiles

Author

Listed:
  • Jain, Amit Kumar
  • Lad, Bhupesh Kumar

Abstract

We put forward a generic tool condition monitoring system capable of embracing the critical problem of prognosticating remaining useful life (RUL) under time-variant operating profiles witnessed in real-world production environments. First, we mathematically model the tool degradation progression via a new, adaptive, and hybrid stochastic degradation model, unifying (1) the real-time degradation signal characteristics from the sensor; (2) the rate of degradation characteristics from historical data; (3) the evolution of the future operating profile; (4) jerks owing to dynamic transitions. Next, for the account of reality, we formulated new mappings, i.e., degradation rate function, and jerk function. Successively, for the first time, we modeled the physics of the evolution of dynamic operating profiles for various scenarios. In the first scenario, the dynamic operating profile evolves in a deterministic way. Here, we approximate the evolution of future profiles as a piecewise constant function. Next, we embrace the accompanying scenario by aiding the future profile to be uncertain. This uncertainty in the evolution of the future profile is modeled via a discrete-time Markov chain. This is further extended to handle a more complex scenario where the prior understanding of the expected future profile is known. Though, the dynamic transitions of distinct profiles in the future are yet again subjected to uncertainty. We inventively capitalize on the total number of transitions in respective profiles and accordingly update the transition distribution. The updated distribution better characterizes the expected profile and eventually reduces the uncertainty. The resulting generalized system approximates the first passage time of the degradation process to a threshold and provides a precise life estimate in real-time. The system is extensively assessed via real-life vibration-based signals to substantiate the claim.

Suggested Citation

  • Jain, Amit Kumar & Lad, Bhupesh Kumar, 2020. "Prognosticating RULs while exploiting the future characteristics of operating profiles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020305329
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    2. Li, Rui & Verhagen, Wim J.C. & Curran, Richard, 2020. "A systematic methodology for Prognostic and Health Management system architecture definition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Herzog, M.A. & Marwala, T. & Heyns, P.S., 2009. "Machine and component residual life estimation through the application of neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 479-489.
    4. Xia, Tangbin & Dong, Yifan & Xiao, Lei & Du, Shichang & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2018. "Recent advances in prognostics and health management for advanced manufacturing paradigms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 255-268.
    5. Son, Junbo & Zhou, Shiyu & Sankavaram, Chaitanya & Du, Xinyu & Zhang, Yilu, 2016. "Remaining useful life prediction based on noisy condition monitoring signals using constrained Kalman filter," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 38-50.
    6. Liu, Yingchao & Hu, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Wenjuan, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction based on health index similarity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 502-510.
    7. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Long, Junqi & Chen, Chuanhai & Liu, Zhifeng & Guo, Jinyan & Chen, Weizheng, 2022. "Stochastic hybrid system approach to task-orientated remaining useful life prediction under time-varying operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Wang, Han & Wang, Dongdong & Liu, Haoxiang & Tang, Gang, 2022. "A predictive sliding local outlier correction method with adaptive state change rate determining for bearing remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Yu, Wennian & Kim, II Yong & Mechefske, Chris, 2020. "An improved similarity-based prognostic algorithm for RUL estimation using an RNN autoencoder scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    6. Xiao, Lei & Tang, Junxuan & Zhang, Xinghui & Bechhoefer, Eric & Ding, Siyi, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on intentional noise injection and feature reconstruction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Zhuang, Liangliang & Xu, Ancha & Wang, Xiao-Lin, 2023. "A prognostic driven predictive maintenance framework based on Bayesian deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Zhou, Kai-Li & Cheng, De-Jun & Zhang, Han-Bing & Hu, Zhong-tai & Zhang, Chun-Yan, 2023. "Deep learning-based intelligent multilevel predictive maintenance framework considering comprehensive cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Zhu, Yongmeng & Wu, Jiechang & Wu, Jun & Liu, Shuyong, 2022. "Dimensionality reduce-based for remaining useful life prediction of machining tools with multisensor fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    11. Berndt Jesenko & Christian Schlögl, 2021. "The effect of web of science subject categories on clustering: the case of data-driven methods in business and economic sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6785-6801, August.
    12. Kamariotis, Antonios & Tatsis, Konstantinos & Chatzi, Eleni & Goebel, Kai & Straub, Daniel, 2024. "A metric for assessing and optimizing data-driven prognostic algorithms for predictive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Kim, Taejin & Lee, Gueseok & Youn, Byeng D., 2019. "PHM experimental design for effective state separation using Jensen–Shannon divergence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Miao, Mengqi & Yu, Jianbo & Zhao, Zhihong, 2022. "A sparse domain adaption network for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings under different working conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Dehghan Shoorkand, Hassan & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hajji, Adnène, 2024. "A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for joint optimization of production and imperfect predictive maintenance planning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Kabir, Elnaz & Guikema, Seth & Kane, Brian, 2018. "Statistical modeling of tree failures during storms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 68-79.
    17. Liu, Junqiang & Pan, Chunlu & Lei, Fan & Hu, Dongbin & Zuo, Hongfu, 2021. "Fault prediction of bearings based on LSTM and statistical process analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    18. Sara Antomarioni & Marjorie Maria Bellinello & Maurizio Bevilacqua & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica & Renan Favarão da Silva & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza, 2020. "A Data-Driven Approach to Extend Failure Analysis: A Framework Development and a Case Study on a Hydroelectric Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Multi-objective design of aircraft maintenance using Gaussian process learning and adaptive sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    20. Manuel Arias Chao & Chetan Kulkarni & Kai Goebel & Olga Fink, 2021. "Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Dataset under Real Flight Conditions for Prognostics and Diagnostics," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:202:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020305329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.