IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v199y2020ics095183201930571x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design optimization of a simple step-stress accelerated life test – Contrast between continuous and interval inspections with non-uniform step durations

Author

Listed:
  • Han, David
  • Bai, Tianyu

Abstract

Thanks to continuously advancing technology and manufacturing processes, the products and devices are becoming highly reliable. However, performing the life tests of these products at normal operating conditions becomes extremely difficult, if not impossible, due to their long lifespans. This can result in missed opportunities to introduce the products to the market in a timely manner and eventually loss of the market share. This problem is solved by accelerated life tests where the test units are subjected to higher stress levels than the normal usage level so that information on the lifetime parameters can be obtained more quickly. The lifetime at the design condition is then estimated through extrapolation using a regression model. Although continuous inspection of the exact failure times is an ideal mode, the exact failure times of test units may not be available in practice due to technical limitations and/or budgetary constraints, but only the failure counts are collected at certain time points during the test (i.e., interval inspection). In this work, the design optimization of a simple step-stress accelerated life test under progressive Type-I censoring is studied with non-uniform step durations for assessing the reliability characteristics of a solar lighting device. Allowing the intermediate censoring to take place at the stress change time point, the nature of the optimal stress duration is demonstrated under various design criteria including D-optimality, T-optimality, C-optimality, A-optimality, and E-optimality. The existence of these optimal designs is investigated in detail for exponential lifetimes with a single stress variable, and the effect of the intermediate censoring proportion on the design efficiency is compared between the continuous and interval inspection modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, David & Bai, Tianyu, 2020. "Design optimization of a simple step-stress accelerated life test – Contrast between continuous and interval inspections with non-uniform step durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s095183201930571x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201930571X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Shuo-Jye & Huang, Syuan-Rong, 2017. "Planning two or more level constant-stress accelerated life tests with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Bing Wang & Keming Yu, 2009. "Optimum plan for step-stress model with progressive type-II censoring," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 115-135, May.
    3. David Han & H.K.T. Ng, 2013. "Comparison between constant‐stress and step‐stress accelerated life tests under Time Constraint," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(7), pages 541-556, October.
    4. René Van Dorp, J. & Mazzuchi, Thomas A., 2005. "A general Bayes weibull inference model for accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 140-147.
    5. Cai, Xia & Tian, Yubin & Ning, Wei, 2019. "Change-point analysis of the failure mechanisms based on accelerated life tests," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 515-522.
    6. Han, Donghoon & Balakrishnan, N., 2010. "Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2066-2081, September.
    7. Cheng‐Hung Hu & Robert D. Plante & Jen Tang, 2013. "Statistical equivalency and optimality of simple step‐stress accelerated test plans for the exponential distribution," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 19-30, February.
    8. Yin, Yi-Chao & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2017. "An imprecise statistical method for accelerated life testing using the power-Weibull model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 158-167.
    9. Li, Xiaoyang & Hu, Yuqing & Zhou, Jiandong & Li, Xiang & Kang, Rui, 2018. "Bayesian step stress accelerated degradation testing design: A multi-objective Pareto-optimal approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 9-17.
    10. Lin, Kunsong & Chen, Yunxia & Xu, Dan, 2017. "Reliability assessment model considering heterogeneous population in a multiple stresses accelerated test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 134-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seokho Moon & Hansam Cho & Eunji Koh & Yong Sung Cho & Hyoung Lok Oh & Younghoon Kim & Seoung Bum Kim, 2022. "Remanufacturing Decision-Making for Gas Insulated Switchgear with Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Jiang, Renyan & Qi, Faqun & Cao, Yu, 2023. "Relation between aging intensity function and WPP plot and its application in reliability modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Cheng, Yao & Liao, Haitao & Huang, Zhiyi, 2021. "Optimal degradation-based hybrid double-stage acceptance sampling plan for a heterogeneous product," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Moustafa, Kassem & Hu, Zhen & Mourelatos, Zissimos P. & Baseski, Igor & Majcher, Monica, 2021. "System reliability analysis using component-level and system-level accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. Zhu, Xiaojun & Balakrishnan, N., 2022. "One-shot device test data analysis using non-parametric and semi-parametric inferential methods and applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Yao & Liao, Haitao & Huang, Zhiyi, 2021. "Optimal degradation-based hybrid double-stage acceptance sampling plan for a heterogeneous product," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Moustafa, Kassem & Hu, Zhen & Mourelatos, Zissimos P. & Baseski, Igor & Majcher, Monica, 2021. "System reliability analysis using component-level and system-level accelerated life testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Man-Ho Ling, 2022. "Optimal Constant-Stress Accelerated Life Test Plans for One-Shot Devices with Components Having Exponential Lifetimes under Gamma Frailty Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Han, David, 2015. "Time and cost constrained optimal designs of constant-stress and step-stress accelerated life tests," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Yan, Weian & Xu, Xiaofan & Bigaud, David & Cao, Wenqin, 2023. "Optimal design of step-stress accelerated degradation tests based on the Tweedie exponential dispersion process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Woo, Seong-woo & Pecht, Michael & O'Neal, Dennis L., 2020. "Reliability design and case study of the domestic compressor subjected to repetitive internal stresses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. David Han & H.K.T. Ng, 2013. "Comparison between constant‐stress and step‐stress accelerated life tests under Time Constraint," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(7), pages 541-556, October.
    8. Qin, Shuidan & Wang, Bing Xing & Wu, Wenhui & Ma, Chao, 2022. "The prediction intervals of remaining useful life based on constant stress accelerated life test data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 747-755.
    9. Yao Liu & Yashun Wang & Zhengwei Fan & Xun Chen & Chunhua Zhang & Yuanyuan Tan, 2020. "A new universal multi-stress acceleration model and multi-parameter estimation method based on particle swarm optimization," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 764-778, December.
    10. Wang, Liang & Wu, Shuo-Jye & Zhang, Chunfang & Dey, Sanku & Tripathi, Yogesh Mani, 2022. "Analysis for constant-stress model on multicomponent system from generalized inverted exponential distribution with stress dependent parameters," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 301-316.
    11. Herbert Hove & Frank Beichelt & Parmod K. Kapur, 2017. "Estimation of the Frank copula model for dependent competing risks in accelerated life testing," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 673-682, December.
    12. Fang, Chen & Cui, Lirong, 2021. "Balanced Systems by Considering Multi-state Competing Risks Under Degradation Processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    13. Lin, Kunsong & Chen, Yunxia, 2021. "Analysis of two-dimensional warranty data considering global and local dependence of heterogeneous marginals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Ekene Gabriel Okafor & Whit Vinson & David Ryan Huitink, 2023. "Effect of Stress Interaction on Multi-Stress Accelerated Life Test Plan: Assessment Based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Naijun Sha & Rong Pan, 2014. "Bayesian analysis for step-stress accelerated life testing using weibull proportional hazard model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 715-726, August.
    16. Chen, Wen-Bin & Li, Xiao-Yang & Kang, Rui, 2022. "Integration for degradation analysis with multi-source ADT datasets considering dataset discrepancies and epistemic uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Zhang, Chunfang & Wang, Liang & Bai, Xuchao & Huang, Jianan, 2022. "Bayesian reliability analysis for copula based step-stress partially accelerated dependent competing risks model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Gupta, Sanjib Kumar & Bhattacharya, Debasis, 2022. "Non-parametric estimation of bivariate reliability from incomplete two-dimensional warranty data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Xu, Dong & Tian, Yubin & Shi, Junbiao & Wang, Dianpeng & Zhang, Ming & Li, Haijin, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimal redundancy for a satellite power supply system based on a new dynamic k-out-of-n: G model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s095183201930571x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.