IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v152y2016icp166-175.html

Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zequn
  • Chen, Wei

Abstract

Time-variant reliability measures the probability that an engineering system successfully performs intended functions over a certain period of time under various sources of uncertainty. In practice, it is computationally prohibitive to propagate uncertainty in time-variant reliability assessment based on expensive or complex numerical models. This paper presents an equivalent stochastic process transformation approach for cost-effective prediction of reliability deterioration over the life cycle of an engineering system. To reduce the high dimensionality, a time-independent reliability model is developed by translating random processes and time parameters into random parameters in order to equivalently cover all potential failures that may occur during the time interval of interest. With the time-independent reliability model, an instantaneous failure surface is attained by using a Kriging-based surrogate model to identify all potential failure events. To enhance the efficacy of failure surface identification, a maximum confidence enhancement method is utilized to update the Kriging model sequentially. Then, the time-variant reliability is approximated using Monte Carlo simulations of the Kriging model where system failures over a time interval are predicted by the instantaneous failure surface. The results of two case studies demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to accurately predict the time evolution of system reliability while requiring much less computational efforts compared with the existing analytical approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zequn & Chen, Wei, 2016. "Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 166-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:166-175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016000491
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crestaux, Thierry & Le Maıˆtre, Olivier & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1161-1172.
    2. Wang, Zequn & Wang, Pingfeng, 2013. "A new approach for reliability analysis with time-variant performance characteristics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 70-81.
    3. Hu, Zhen & Du, Xiaoping, 2012. "Reliability analysis for hydrokinetic turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 251-262.
    4. Breitung, Karl, 1988. "Asymptotic crossing rates for stationary Gaussian vector processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 195-207, September.
    5. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Junxiang & Chen, Jianqiao, 2019. "Solving time-variant reliability-based design optimization by PSO-t-IRS: A methodology incorporating a particle swarm optimization algorithm and an enhanced instantaneous response surface," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Zhang, Kun & Chen, Ning & Zeng, Peng & Liu, Jian & Beer, Michael, 2022. "An efficient reliability analysis method for structures with hybrid time-dependent uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Hawchar, Lara & El Soueidy, Charbel-Pierre & Schoefs, Franck, 2017. "Principal component analysis and polynomial chaos expansion for time-variant reliability problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 406-416.
    4. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "Real-time high-fidelity reliability updating with equality information using adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    6. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    7. Chen, Xin & Molina-Cristóbal, Arturo & Guenov, Marin D. & Riaz, Atif, 2019. "Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 97-115.
    8. Melito, Gian Marco & Müller, Thomas Stephan & Badeli, Vahid & Ellermann, Katrin & Brenn, Günter & Reinbacher-Köstinger, Alice, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis study on the effect of the fluid mechanics assumptions for the computation of electrical conductivity of flowing human blood," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    10. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    11. Novák, Lukáš & Valdebenito, Marcos & Faes, Matthias, 2025. "On fractional moment estimation from polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    12. Anstett-Collin, F. & Goffart, J. & Mara, T. & Denis-Vidal, L., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of complex models: Coping with dynamic and static inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 268-275.
    13. Horiguchi, Akira & Pratola, Matthew T. & Santner, Thomas J., 2021. "Assessing variable activity for Bayesian regression trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    14. Alexanderian, Alen & Gremaud, Pierre A. & Smith, Ralph C., 2020. "Variance-based sensitivity analysis for time-dependent processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. Steiner, M. & Bourinet, J.-M. & Lahmer, T., 2019. "An adaptive sampling method for global sensitivity analysis based on least-squares support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 323-340.
    16. Beccacece, Francesca & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Buzzard, Greg & Cillo, Alessandra & Zionts, Stanley, 2015. "Elicitation of multiattribute value functions through high dimensional model representations: Monotonicity and interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 517-527.
    17. Haro Sandoval, Eduardo & Anstett-Collin, Floriane & Basset, Michel, 2012. "Sensitivity study of dynamic systems using polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 15-26.
    18. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    19. Constantine, Paul G. & Diaz, Paul, 2017. "Global sensitivity metrics from active subspaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-13.
    20. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:152:y:2016:i:c:p:166-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.