IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v121y2014icp104-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility study and uncertainties in the validation of an existing safety-related control circuit with the ISO 13849-1:2006 design standard

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyn, Sabrina
  • Baudoin, James
  • Chinniah, Yuvin
  • Charpentier, Philippe

Abstract

In industry, machine users and people who modify or integrate equipment often have to evaluate the safety level of a safety-related control circuit that they have not necessarily designed. The modifications or integrations may involve work to make an existing machine that does not comply with normative or regulatory specifications safe. However, how can a circuit performing a safety function be validated a posteriori? Is the validation exercise feasible? What are the difficulties and limitations of such a procedure? The aim of this article is to answer these questions by presenting a validation study of a safety function of an existing machine. A plastic injection molding machine is used for this study, as well as standard ISO 13849-1:2006. Validation consists of performing an a posteriori (post-design) estimation of the performance level of the safety function. The procedure is studied for two contexts of use of the machine: in industry, and in laboratory. The calculations required by the ISO standard were done using Excel, followed by SIStema software. It is shown that, based on the context of use, the estimated performance level was different for the same safety-related circuit. The variability in the results is explained by the assumptions made by the person undertaking the validation without the involvement of the machine designer.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyn, Sabrina & Baudoin, James & Chinniah, Yuvin & Charpentier, Philippe, 2014. "Feasibility study and uncertainties in the validation of an existing safety-related control circuit with the ISO 13849-1:2006 design standard," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 104-112.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:121:y:2014:i:c:p:104-112
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013002226
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dutuit, Y. & Innal, F. & Rauzy, A. & Signoret, J.-P., 2008. "Probabilistic assessments in relationship with safety integrity levels by using Fault Trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(12), pages 1867-1876.
    2. Hietikko, Marita & Malm, Timo & Alanen, Jarmo, 2011. "Risk estimation studies in the context of a machine control function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 767-774.
    3. Ruud, Stian & Mikkelsen, Ã…ge, 2008. "Risk-based rules for crane safety systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(9), pages 1369-1376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hietikko, Marita & Malm, Timo & Saha, Heikki, 2015. "Comparing performance level estimation of safety functions in three distributed structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 218-229.
    2. Porras-Vázquez, Alberto & Romero-Pérez, Julio-Ariel, 2018. "A new methodology for facilitating the design of safety-related parts of control systems in machines according to ISO 13849:2006 standard," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 60-70.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijie, Chen & Tao, Tang & Xianqiong, Zhao & Schnieder, Eckehard, 2012. "Verification of the safety communication protocol in train control system using colored Petri net," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 8-18.
    2. Hokstad, Per, 2014. "Demand rate and risk reduction for safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 12-20.
    3. Florent Brissaud & Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer, 2012. "Probability of failure on demand of safety systems: impact of partial test distribution," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 426-436, August.
    4. Lei Wang & Qing Liu & Tongle Yin, 2018. "Decision-making of investment in navigation safety improving schemes with application of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 710-724, December.
    5. Son, Kwang Seop & Seong, Seung Hwan & Kang, Hyun Gook & Jang, Gwi Sook, 2020. "Development of state-based integrated dependability model of RPS in NPPs considering CCF and periodic testing effects at the early design phase," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Kiswendsida Abel Ouedraogo & Julie Beugin & El‐Miloudi El‐Koursi & Joffrey Clarhaut & Dominique Renaux & Frederic Lisiecki, 2018. "Toward an Application Guide for Safety Integrity Level Allocation in Railway Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1634-1655, August.
    7. Oliveira, Luiz Fernando & Abramovitch, Rafael Nelson, 2010. "Extension of ISA TR84.00.02 PFD equations to KooN architectures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 707-715.
    8. Alizadeh, Siamak & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2018. "Impact of common cause failure on reliability performance of redundant safety related systems subject to process demand," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 129-150.
    9. Hristos Karahalios, 2017. "Evaluating the knowledge of experts in the maritime regulatory field," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 426-441, May.
    10. Innal, Fares & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Liu, Yiliu & Barros, Anne, 2016. "PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 160-170.
    11. Palmer, C. & Chung, P.W.H., 2009. "An automated system for batch hazard and operability studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1095-1106.
    12. Gabriel, Angelito & Ozansoy, Cagil & Shi, Juan, 2018. "Developments in SIL determination and calculation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 148-161.
    13. Wang, Chuan & Liu, Yupeng & Wang, Dongbo & Wang, Guorong & Wang, Dingya & Yu, Chao, 2021. "Reliability evaluation method based on dynamic fault diagnosis results: A case study of a seabed mud lifting system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Langdalen, Henrik & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2020. "On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2011. "Modeling safety instrumented systems with MooN voting architectures addressing system reconfiguration for testing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 545-563.
    16. Feng, Zhichao & Zhou, Zhijie & Hu, Changhua & Ban, Xiaojun & Hu, Guanyu, 2020. "A safety assessment model based on belief rule base with new optimization method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Monnin, Maxime & Iung, Benoit & Sénéchal, Olivier, 2011. "Dynamic behavioural model for assessing impact of regeneration actions on system availability: Application to weapon systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 410-424.
    18. W Mechri & C Simon & K Ben Othman, 2011. "Uncertainty analysis of common cause failure in safety instrumented systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(4), pages 450-460, December.
    19. Ding, Long & Wang, Hong & Kang, Kai & Wang, Kai, 2014. "A novel method for SIL verification based on system degradation using reliability block diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 36-45.
    20. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:121:y:2014:i:c:p:104-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.