IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v119y2013icp26-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?

Author

Listed:
  • Molina, Roger
  • Unsworth, Kerrie
  • Hodkiewicz, Melinda
  • Adriasola, Elisa

Abstract

Can data collectors be “pushed†into collecting high quality data or would being “pulled†be more effective? This paper finds that managers should be careful of the degree to which “push†factors, such as managerial pressure and technological input control, are relied upon. While they may be helpful for motivating those data collectors who are not intrinsically motivated, they are either not helpful or may discourage those data collectors who are intrinsically motivated. Instead, self-concordance may act as a longer-term, more stable approach to increasing the motivation of data collectors and thus increasing the quality of data that enter reliability systems. This study uses a sequential mixed-method approach involving interviews with 20 data collectors and a quantitative survey of 109 data collectors in a water utility. It examines the interactive effect of managerial pressure, technological input control and self-concordance on data collection performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Molina, Roger & Unsworth, Kerrie & Hodkiewicz, Melinda & Adriasola, Elisa, 2013. "Are managerial pressure, technological control and intrinsic motivation effective in improving data quality?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 26-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:26-34
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.04.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201300104X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.04.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Podsakoff, Nathan P. & Podsakoff, Philip M. & Kuskova, Valentina V., 2010. "Dispelling misconceptions and providing guidelines for leader reward and punishment behavior," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 291-303, May.
    2. Unsworth, Kerrie & Adriasola, Elisa & Johnston-Billings, Amber & Dmitrieva, Alina & Hodkiewicz, Melinda, 2011. "Goal hierarchy: Improving asset data quality by improving motivation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1474-1481.
    3. Murphy, Glen D., 2010. "Testing a tri-partite contingent model of engineering cultures: A pilot study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1040-1049.
    4. Murphy, Glen D., 2009. "Improving the quality of manually acquired data: Applying the theory of planned behaviour to data quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1881-1886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robin Le Conte Des Floris & Cédric Dalmasso & Pierre Jouvelot, 2022. "The impact of motivation on the quality of project management data: an emailbased communication case study," Post-Print hal-03662794, HAL.
    2. Haegemans, Tom & Snoeck, Monique & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2018. "Entering data correctly: An empirical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in the context of manual data acquisition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 12-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Lynda & Murphy, Glen & Chang, Artemis, 2014. "The construction of social identity in newly recruited nuclear engineering staff: A longitudinal study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 14-28.
    2. Unsworth, Kerrie & Adriasola, Elisa & Johnston-Billings, Amber & Dmitrieva, Alina & Hodkiewicz, Melinda, 2011. "Goal hierarchy: Improving asset data quality by improving motivation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1474-1481.
    3. Haegemans, Tom & Snoeck, Monique & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2018. "Entering data correctly: An empirical evaluation of the theory of planned behaviour in the context of manual data acquisition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 12-30.
    4. Mathieu Payette & Georges Abdul-Nour, 2023. "Machine Learning Applications for Reliability Engineering: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Lin Liu & Qiang Mei & Lixin Jiang & Jinnan Wu & Suxia Liu & Meng Wang, 2021. "Safety-Specific Passive-Avoidant Leadership and Safety Compliance among Chinese Steel Workers: The Moderating Role of Safety Moral Belief and Organizational Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Barabadi, Abbas & Tobias Gudmestad, Ove & Barabady, Javad, 2015. "RAMS data collection under Arctic conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 92-99.
    7. Claudiu George Bocean & Cristina Claudia Rotea & Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru & Andra-Nicoleta Ploscaru & Cătălin-Ștefan Rotea, 2021. "A Two-Stage SEM—Artificial Neural Network Analysis of the Rewards Effects on Self Perceived Performance in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Tremblay, Michel & Simard, Gilles, 2018. "A multifoci approach to study social support and job performance: A target similarity consideration of development-enhancing practices, leadership, and structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 118-130.
    9. Mehmet KIZILOĞLU & Sabahat BAYRAK KÖK, 2020. "Denison Örgüt Kültürü Modeli Bağlamında Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Güç İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 49(1), pages 60-85, May.
    10. Daniele Nosenzo & Theo Offerman & Martin Sefton & Ailko van der Veen, 2016. "Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 502-517, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:26-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.