IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v103y2015icp47-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective life cycle assessment of an antibacterial T-shirt and supporting business decisions to create value

Author

Listed:
  • Manda, B. M. Krishna
  • Worrell, Ernst
  • Patel, Martin K.

Abstract

Global production and consumption of textiles is increasing and as a result putting pressure on the environment. In the EU-25 countries for example, 2–10% of environmental impacts are associated with clothing consumption, with washing during the use phase as one of the most significant contributors. Antibacterial textiles, which prevent undesirable odours, may reduce the number of washing cycles, thus offering an opportunity to reduce environmental impacts. This article assess to what extent different antibacterial T-shirts offer opportunities. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to assist the producer in making business decisions to create value during product development process. To this end, we conducted an LCA for an antibacterial T-shirt made in Europe from bio-based man-made cellulose fibres (modal). The antibacterial property is obtained by silver nanoparticles that are produced with colloidal techniques such as the sol–gel process and in-situ formation. It was found that the T-shirt made of 50% antibacterial fibres with the in-situ process (50AB in-situ) caused 15–20% lower cradle-to-gate CO2 emissions than commercial antibacterial T-shirts. The cradle-to-grave comparison with non-antibacterial modal T-shirts showed that the 50AB in-situ T-shirt exhibited better environmental performance, resulting in 20–30% lower impacts in key categories such as climate change, freshwater toxicity and eutrophication. LCA demonstrated value creation opportunities such as lower environmental impacts, lower costs and risks. Moreover, the product's environmental performance can be transparently communicated to customers, which helps differentiating with competing products in the market, thus offering the producer a competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Manda, B. M. Krishna & Worrell, Ernst & Patel, Martin K., 2015. "Prospective life cycle assessment of an antibacterial T-shirt and supporting business decisions to create value," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 47-57.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:47-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915300434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woolridge, Anne C. & Ward, Garth D. & Phillips, Paul S. & Collins, Michael & Gandy, Simon, 2006. "Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 94-103.
    2. Shen, Li & Worrell, Ernst & Patel, Martin K., 2010. "Environmental impact assessment of man-made cellulose fibres," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 260-274.
    3. Durk S. Nijdam & Harry C. Wilting & Mark J. Goedkoop & Jacob Madsen, 2005. "Environmental Load from Dutch Private Consumption: How Much Damage Takes Place Abroad?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(1‐2), pages 147-168, January.
    4. Sandin, Gustav & Peters, Greg M. & Svanström, Magdalena, 2013. "Moving down the cause-effect chain of water and land use impacts: An LCA case study of textile fibres," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 104-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Witjes, Sjors & Vermeulen, Walter J.V. & Cramer, Jacqueline M., 2017. "Assessing Corporate Sustainability integration for corporate self-reflection," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 132-147.
    2. Tuğçe Demirdelen & İnayet Özge Aksu & Kübra Yilmaz & Duygu Durdu Koç & Miray Arikan & Arif Şener, 2023. "Investigation of the Carbon Footprint of the Textile Industry: PES- and PP-Based Products with Monte Carlo Uncertainty Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Rita Henriques & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Yamuza-Blanco, Luis & Monsalve, Fabio & Román-Collado, Rocío & Sanz-Díaz, María Teresa, 2025. "What is behind the producer GHG emissions footprint of textile and clothing in the EU-27? An environmentally extended multi-regional input-output analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Carolina Reyes Forsberg & Jenny Bengtsson & Nadine Hollinger & Tahani Kaldéus, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Viscose-to-Viscose Production: Strategies for Recycling of Viscose Fibres," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Yaolin Wang & Chenyang Liu & Xi Zhang & Shaoting Zeng, 2023. "Research on Sustainable Furniture Design Based on Waste Textiles Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Cristiano Cantore & Miguel León-Ledesma & Peter McAdam & Alpo Willman, 2014. "Shocking Stuff: Technology, Hours, And Factor Substitution," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 108-128, February.
    4. Wiedmann, Thomas, 2009. "A first empirical comparison of energy Footprints embodied in trade -- MRIO versus PLUM," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1975-1990, May.
    5. Tukker, Arnold & Goldbohm, R. Alexandra & de Koning, Arjan & Verheijden, Marieke & Kleijn, René & Wolf, Oliver & Pérez-Domínguez, Ignacio & Rueda-Cantuche, Jose M., 2011. "Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1776-1788, August.
    6. Philipp Schepelmann & An Vercalsteren & José Acosta-Fernandez & Mathieu Saurat & Katrien Boonen & Maarten Christis & Giovanni Marin & Roberto Zoboli & Cathy Maguire, 2020. "Driving Forces of Changing Environmental Pressures from Consumption in the European Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Leopold Prendl & René Hofmann, 2021. "Case Study of Multi-Period MILP HENS with Heat Pump and Storage Options for the Application in Energy Intensive Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Yu, Biying & Zhang, Junyi & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2011. "Representing in-home and out-of-home energy consumption behavior in Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 4168-4177, July.
    9. Li, You & Hewitt, C.N., 2008. "The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1907-1914, June.
    10. Hurmekoski, Elias & Kunttu, Janni & Heinonen, Tero & Pukkala, Timo & Peltola, Heli, 2023. "Does expanding wood use in construction and textile markets contribute to climate change mitigation?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Franco Solís, Alberto & F.T. Avelino, André & Carrascal-Incera, André, 2020. "The evolution of household-induced value chains and their environmental implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Irena Wojnowska-Baryła & Katarzyna Bernat & Magdalena Zaborowska & Dorota Kulikowska, 2024. "The Growing Problem of Textile Waste Generation—The Current State of Textile Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Dissanayake, Geetha & Sinha, Pammi, 2015. "An examination of the product development process for fashion remanufacturing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 94-102.
    14. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    15. Moran, Daniel D. & Wackernagel, Mathis C. & Kitzes, Justin A. & Heumann, Benjamin W. & Phan, Doantam & Goldfinger, Steven H., 2009. "Trading spaces: Calculating embodied Ecological Footprints in international trade using a Product Land Use Matrix (PLUM)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1938-1951, May.
    16. Gemechu, Eskinder D. & Butnar, Isabela & Llop Llop, Maria & Sangwong, S. & Castells i Piqué, Francesc, 2013. "CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: A multiregional Inputoutput model for Spain," Working Papers 2072/212195, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    17. Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    18. Sandin, Gustav & Peters, Greg M. & Svanström, Magdalena, 2013. "Moving down the cause-effect chain of water and land use impacts: An LCA case study of textile fibres," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 104-113.
    19. Wei, Rui & Zhang, Wencheng & Peng, Shuijun, 2022. "Energy and greenhouse gas footprints of China households during 1995–2019: A global perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Wiedmann, Thomas & Lenzen, Manfred & Turner, Karen & Barrett, John, 2007. "Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities -- Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 15-26, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:47-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.