IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reacre/v26y2014i2p204-211.html

Recalling the Public Oversight Board (1977–2002) and winners of the John J. McCloy Award

Author

Listed:
  • Flesher, Dale L.
  • Sharp, Andrew D.

Abstract

The Public Oversight Board (POB) was an independent, private sector body that, between 1977 and 2002, monitored and reported on the self-regulatory activities of the SEC Practice Section of the Division for CPA Firms of the AICPA. In retrospect, the POB served an important developmental purpose prior to legislation that established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in 2002. As a part of its activities, the POB began in 1989 to honor individuals who had made major contributions to auditing practice. This paper features profiles of individuals who contributed to the development of financial auditing in the United States and who were nationally recognized when the POB selected them as recipients of the John J. McCloy Award. The McCloy Award, given to recognize individual contributions to the achievement of audit excellence by the POB between 1989 and 2001, honored those who advanced the activities of the external auditing profession. McCloy, for whom the award was named, served as the POB's chairman from its inception in 1977 to 1984. As a diplomat and public servant, this non-accountant accumulated a distinguished record of service over his career. The McCloy Award winners were the exemplars of public accountability. Winners had a mix of backgrounds; some had been president or chairman of the AICPA or had won the AICPA Gold Medal for Distinguished Service. Still other McCloy winners were not involved with publicly-held clients on a regular basis, or were not practicing accountants, but whose recognition was merited because of their insistence on the public accountability of the auditing profession. Regardless, the McCloy Award recipients represent those who contributed to the effectiveness of the public auditing process in the United States. To date the PCAOB has not elected to continue the McCloy Award or to establish a similar recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Flesher, Dale L. & Sharp, Andrew D., 2014. "Recalling the Public Oversight Board (1977–2002) and winners of the John J. McCloy Award," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 204-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:26:y:2014:i:2:p:204-211
    DOI: 10.1016/j.racreg.2014.09.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045714000435
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.racreg.2014.09.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carcello, Joseph V. & Hollingsworth, Carl & Mastrolia, Stacy A., 2011. "The effect of PCAOB inspections on Big 4 audit quality," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 85-96.
    2. Blankley, Alan I. & Kerr, David S. & Wiggins, Casper E., 2012. "A content analysis of CPA firms’ correspondence following PCAOB inspections: 2004–2010," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 74-89.
    3. Rupley, Kathleen & Almer, Elizabeth & Philbrick, Donna, 2011. "Audit committee effectiveness: Perceptions of public company audit committee members post-SOX," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 138-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keyser, John D., 2015. "The PCAOB's role in audit conduct and conscience," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 111-118.
    2. Sheu, Robert J., 2018. "An investigation about origins: A brief history of the PCAOB'S regulatory model," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 159-165.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moehrle, Stephen R. & Mintchik, Natalia & Mohrman, Mary Beth & Reynolds-Moehrle, Jennifer A. & Vargus, Mark, 2014. "Developments in accounting regulation: A synthesis and annotated bibliography of evidence and commentary in the 2011 academic literature," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 175-195.
    2. Löhlein, Lukas, 2016. "From peer review to PCAOB inspections: Regulating for audit quality in the U.S," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 28-47.
    3. Carlin Dowling & W. Robert Knechel & Robyn Moroney, 2018. "Public Oversight of Audit Firms: The Slippery Slope of Enforcing Regulation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 353-380, September.
    4. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, May.
    5. Stefan Sundgren & Tobias Svanström, 2013. "Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing: evidence from small- and medium-sized enterprises," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 31-55, February.
    6. Abernathy, John L. & Barnes, Michael & Stefaniak, Chad, 2013. "A summary of 10 years of PCAOB research: What have we learned?," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 30-60.
    7. Shawn X. Huang & Min Kim & Maria Rykaczewski & Maria Vulcheva, 2025. "Regulation takes a back seat to business concerns: international evidence from stock exchange demutualization," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1916-1967, June.
    8. Al-Akra, Mahmoud & Hutchinson, Patrick, 2013. "Family firm disclosure and accounting regulation reform in the Middle East: The case of Jordan," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 101-107.
    9. Nathan R. Berglund, 2020. "Do Client Bankruptcies Preceded by Clean Audit Opinions Damage Auditor Reputation?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1914-1951, September.
    10. Edmonds, Jennifer E. & Leece, Ryan D., 2017. "An investigation of the effectiveness of the division of corporate finance as a monitor of financial reporting," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 44-51.
    11. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2018. "How do Independent Directors Behave with Respect to Sustainability Disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 609-627, July.
    12. I. M. García‐Sánchez & J. Martínez‐Ferrero, 2017. "Independent Directors and CSR Disclosures: The moderating effects of proprietary costs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 28-43, January.
    13. Keyser, John D., 2023. "Examine the available evidence: Was the Duhnke PCAOB captured?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Fung, Simon Yu Kit & Raman, K.K. & Zhu, Xindong (Kevin), 2017. "Does the PCAOB international inspection program improve audit quality for non-US-listed foreign clients?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 15-36.
    15. Yuan, Shuai & Lan, Hao & Seufert, Juergen H., 2020. "FRC intervention, financial reporting quality and due diligence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Brivot, Marion & Cho, Charles H. & Kuhn, John R., 2015. "Marketing or parrhesia: A longitudinal study of AICPA's shifting languages in times of turbulence," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 23-43.
    17. Löhlein, Lukas, 2016. "From peer review to PCAOB inspections: regulating for audit quality in the U.S," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67147, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Dickins, Denise & Fay, Rebecca & Daugherty, Brian, 2015. "For better or worse: A study of auditors' practices under Auditing Standard No. 7," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 174-186.
    19. Kim, Yongtae & (Nancy) Su, Lixin & (Stephen) Zhou, Gaoguang & (Kevin) Zhu, Xindong, 2020. "PCAOB international inspections and Merger and Acquisition outcomes," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    20. Bajra, Ujkan & Čadež, Simon, 2018. "Audit committees and financial reporting quality: The 8th EU Company Law Directive perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 151-163.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reacre:v:26:y:2014:i:2:p:204-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-accounting-regulation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.