IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v20y1996i3p235-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and quota management system in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Karagiannakos, A

Abstract

The impact of the TAC and quota system, which is the corner stone of resource management and conservation policy of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), is evaluated. Particular attention is given to the situation of the North Sea demersal fisheries, in order to elucidate the effectiveness of the resource management. The TAC and quota system has not had the desired influence on the direction of economic development in the fishing industry. The system fails to achieve its principal aim, which is to maintain fish stocks and conserve the resource. In several species landings are continually decreasing, while, in addition, the measure generates a series of common practices that are incompatible with the conservation objective. Political pressures usually lead to considerable alterations of the scientist's recommendations, resulting in regular overestimation of the resource capacity. For the time being fisheries management in the European Union (EU) has little to gain from the use of MATACs and/or MSTACs.

Suggested Citation

  • Karagiannakos, A, 1996. "Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and quota management system in the European Union," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 235-248, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:235-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308-597X(96)86986-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carpenter, Griffin & Kleinjans, Richard & Villasante, Sebastian & O’Leary, Bethan C., 2016. "Landing the blame: The influence of EU Member States on quota setting," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 9-15.
    2. Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom & McLoughlin, Richard & Rayns, Nick, 2007. "Benchmarking for fisheries governance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 470-479, July.
    3. van Dijk, Diana & Haijema, Rene & Hendrix, Eligius M.T. & Groeneveld, Rolf A. & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2013. "Fluctuating quota and management costs under multiannual adjustment of fish quota," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 230-238.
    4. Diana Dijk & Eligius M. T. Hendrix & Rene Haijema & Rolf A. Groeneveld & Ekko C. Ierland, 2017. "An Adjustment Restriction on Fish Quota: Resource Rents, Overcapacity and Recovery of Fish Stock," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 203-230, June.
    5. Hatchard, Jenny L. & Gray, Tim S., 2014. "From RACs to Advisory Councils: Lessons from North Sea discourse for the 2014 reform of the European Common Fisheries Policy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 87-93.
    6. Catherine Benjamin & Hervé Guyomard, 1996. "Analyse des modes de régulation publique des pêcheries : applicabilité d'un système de quotas individuels transférables à l'Union européenne," Working Papers hal-01897091, HAL.
    7. Bjørndal, Trond & Lappo, Alena & Ramos, Jorge, 2015. "An economic analysis of the Portuguese fisheries sector 1960–2011," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 21-30.
    8. Schlüter, Maja & Baeza, Andres & Dressler, Gunnar & Frank, Karin & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Jager, Wander & Janssen, Marco A. & McAllister, Ryan R.J. & Müller, Birgit & Orach, Kirill & Schwarz, Nina & Wij, 2017. "A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 21-35.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:20:y:1996:i:3:p:235-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.