IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837720301010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-temporal variances and risk evaluation of land finance in China at the provincial level from 1998 to 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bangbang
  • Li, Jiaxiang
  • Tian, Wenmiao
  • Chen, Haibin
  • Kong, Xiangbin
  • Chen, Wei
  • Zhao, Minjuan
  • Xia, Xianli

Abstract

Excessive dependence on land finance (hereafter LF) in China’s urbanisation process has generated various problems and compromised the interests of future generations, hence a transformation from “land urbanisation” to “population urbanisation” is now called for. Nevertheless, before turning towards a new urbanisation strategy, the spatio-temporal variances of LF and associated risks for regional sustainability deserve further investigation. This study developed a comprehensive evaluation indicator system from administrative, economic, social and ecological perspectives, to evaluate the LF risks at provincial scale in mainland China from 1998 to 2017, applying the combined AHP-Entropy method and Multi-Criteria analysis. The results indicated that land transfer dependence remained high across all provinces over the last two decades, and the LF risk increased accordingly. In 2015, economic, social, and total risks of China as a whole all reached a “high” risk level, ecological risk was at the level of “critical”, although administrative risk kept going down and was at a “low” risk level in recent years, thanks to the persistent nation-wide effort on cracking down on corruption. Spatially, total LF risk generally presented a declining gradient from east to west. Through analysing the tentative and plausible causes to above spatio-temporal variances, five policy suggestions were put forward: (1) reforming current cadre assessment and fiscal decentralisation systems; (2) transforming the residential housing supply structure; (3) establishing a comprehensive land ecological conservation system; (4) promoting a flexible leasehold mechanism in primary land market; and (5) restructuring the industrial layout to defuse differentiated LF risks across provinces. With empirical data and comprehensive risk evaluations, this study contributed to improve our knowledge on the spatio-temporal patterns of LF and its associated risks at provincial scale, helped to inform future urbanisation policy designs and ultimately to promote regional sustainability for China and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Jiaxiang & Tian, Wenmiao & Chen, Haibin & Kong, Xiangbin & Chen, Wei & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2020. "Spatio-temporal variances and risk evaluation of land finance in China at the provincial level from 1998 to 2017," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720301010
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720301010
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Nannan, 2019. "What gave rise to China’s land finance?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Hassanli, Mohammad & Ebrahimian, Hamed & Mohammadi, Ehsan & Rahimi, Amirreza & Shokouhi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Simulating maize yields when irrigating with saline water, using the AquaCrop, SALTMED, and SWAP models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 91-99.
    3. Feng, Weilun & Liu, Yansui & Qu, Lulu, 2019. "Effect of land-centered urbanization on rural development: A regional analysis in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Liu, Yong & Fan, Peilei & Yue, Wenze & Song, Yan, 2018. "Impacts of land finance on urban sprawl in China: The case of Chongqing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 420-432.
    5. Mo, Jiawei, 2018. "Land financing and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese counties," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 218-239.
    6. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    7. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    8. Hao, MingJie & Macdonald, Angus S. & Tapadar, Pradip & Thomas, R. Guy, 2016. "Insurance Loss Coverage Under Restricted Risk Classification: The Case Of Iso-Elastic Demand," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 265-291, May.
    9. Tang, Peng & Shi, Xiaoping & Gao, Jinlong & Feng, Shuyi & Qu, Futian, 2019. "Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: An empirical study through the lens of government expenditure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 302-309.
    10. Zhang, Bangbang & Niu, Wenhao & Ma, Linyan & Zuo, Xuyang & Kong, Xiangbin & Chen, Haibin & Zhang, Yifan & Chen, Wei & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2019. "A company-dominated pattern of land consolidation to solve land fragmentation problem and its effectiveness evaluation: A case study in a hilly region of Guangxi Autonomous Region, Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Zhang, Bangbang & Feng, Gary & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Kong, Xiangbin & Ouyang, Ying & Adeli, Ardeshir & Jenkins, Johnie N., 2018. "Soybean crop-water production functions in a humid region across years and soils determined with APEX model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 180-191.
    12. Zhong, Taiyang & Zhang, Xiaoling & Huang, Xianjin & Liu, Fang, 2019. "Blessing or curse? Impact of land finance on rural public infrastructure development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 130-141.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guanyi Yin & Yi Lou & Shuai Xie & Wei Wei, 2022. "Evaluation of the Response of Grain Productivity to Different Arable Land Allocation Intensities in the Land Use Planning System of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Ke Zhao & Danling Chen & Xupeng Zhang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2022. "How Do Urban Land Expansion, Land Finance, and Economic Growth Interact?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Lida Han & Xi Wu & Peng Tang, 2023. "Does Environmental Decentralization Affect the Supply of Urban Construction Land? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. De Zhou & Ruilin Tian & Zhulu Lin & Liming Liu & Junfeng Wang & Shijia Feng, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Risk Assessment of Land Finance: Evidence from China," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Di & Ren, Cairu & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "Understanding the impact of land finance on industrial structure change in China: Insights from a spatial econometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Siyu Han & Mengcheng Wang & Qi Liu & Renyang Wang & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Land Disposition Derived from Land Finance on Urban Innovation in China: Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Ke Zhao & Danling Chen & Xupeng Zhang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2022. "How Do Urban Land Expansion, Land Finance, and Economic Growth Interact?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Xiaodong Yang & Weilong Wang & Xufeng Su & Siyu Ren & Qiying Ran & Jianlong Wang & Jianhong Cao, 2023. "Analysis of the influence of land finance on haze pollution: An empirical study based on 269 prefecture‐level cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 101-134, March.
    5. Peng Wang & Zinan Shao & Jian Wang & Qun Wu, 2021. "The impact of land finance on urban land use efficiency: A panel threshold model for Chinese provinces," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 310-331, March.
    6. Xiaotong Li & Ying Li & Jinlan Ni & Jia Yuan, 2022. "Master development, land appreciation, and government finance: Evidence from the Disney project in Shanghai," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 1027-1046, August.
    7. Li, L. & Bao, Helen X.H. & Robinson, Guy M., 2020. "The return of state control and its impact on land market efficiency in urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Fan, Xin & Qiu, Sainan & Sun, Yukun, 2020. "Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Xupeng Zhang & Danling Chen & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang & Bin Jiang, 2021. "Interaction between Land Financing Strategy and the Implementation Deviation of Local Governments’ Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Jiang, Ronghao & Lin, George C.S., 2021. "Placing China’s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Xinhai Lu & Mingxu Bai & Bing Kuang & Danling Chen, 2021. "Unlocking the Relationship between Land Finance and Regional Integration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Zhou, Lin & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Yang, Linchuan, 2021. "Industrial land supply at different technological intensities and its contribution to economic growth in China: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Zeng, Chen, 2019. "Spatial spillover effect on land conveyance fee—A multi-scheme investigation in Wuhan agglomeration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Danxia Zhang & Juanfeng Zhang & Rui Han & Dongsheng Zhan, 2022. "Two‐stage development, allocation strategies' effect, and industrial land policies' adjustment, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 890-909, June.
    18. Han, Libin & Lu, Ming & Xiang, Kuanhu & Zhong, Huiyong, 2021. "Density, distance and debt: New-town construction and local-government financial risks in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. De Zhou & Ruilin Tian & Zhulu Lin & Liming Liu & Junfeng Wang & Shijia Feng, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Risk Assessment of Land Finance: Evidence from China," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Cheng, Yudan & Jia, Shanghui & Meng, Huan, 2022. "Fiscal policy choices of local governments in China: Land finance or local government debt?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 294-308.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837720301010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.