Author
Listed:
- Yiwen, Zhang
- Yiming, Huo
- Weiye, Wang
Abstract
Forestland transfer has been promoted as a key policy instrument to address severe parcelization and improve management efficiency. However, in China, despite long-standing policy support, actual transfer rates remain persistently low. While existing research attributes this to institutional and economic barriers, little is known about how smallholders’ subjective perceptions of forest values influence their market participation. This study examines how forest value orientations (FVOs), defined as smallholders’ perceived importance of different forest functions, shape their willingness, price expectations, and actual behaviors regarding forestland transfers. Using household-level data collected from timber-forest farmers across several provinces in southern China, exploratory factor analysis identifies three distinct value dimensions: ecological, economic, and emotional-symbolic. Binary Logit, Heckman two-step, and Cragg double-hurdle models are applied to estimate their effects on willingness-to-transfer, willingness-to-pay (WTP), willingness-to-accept (WTA), and realized transactions. Results show that ecological values significantly inhibit both transfer willingness and participation, likely reflecting the public-good nature and management burdens of ecologically valuable forests. In contrast, economic values promote active market engagement and narrow the WTA–WTP gap by aligning expectations with market benchmarks. Emotional-symbolic values, though less influential overall, positively affect transfer intentions, reflecting their role as private, exchangeable benefits under China’s temporary transfer arrangements. The findings highlight that subjective forest value perceptions critically shape market participation and price formation. Recognizing these heterogeneous value orientations can help policymakers design more nuanced, value-sensitive interventions to foster efficient and culturally appropriate forestland markets.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.