IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v119y2022ics0264837722001685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The landscape thresholds analysis as an integrated approach to landscape interpretation for planning purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Rędzińska, Katarzyna
  • Szulczewska, Barbara
  • Wolski, Przemysław

Abstract

Two general arguments have triggered the need for tools enabling planners a careful consideration of complicated landscape conditions in planning and design decisions. The first one is the need to implement sustainable development rules, including landscape heritage protection while the urban transformation is taking place. The second one is the lack of comprehensive landscape planning tools responding to the new landscape definition and landscape development rules of the European Landscape Convention (2000). In recent years the hermeneutical approach emerged and provided the framework to construct such tools. The landscape thresholds analysis (LTA) has been built upon this approach and threshold theory, which has a long tradition in spatial planning. A description of the method is presented based on the example of West Wilanów (Warsaw, Poland). Within this area, the Wilanów Town housing estate has been located on the grounds of the former royal residence with still existing palace surrounded by a park. The application of the LTA method allowed “translation” of the results of the landscape interpretation into spatial categories (here: natural, cultural, and sensual-cognitive thresholds) and an indication of the areas with different restrictions. The presented LTA method, embedded in a theoretical hermeneutical framework, provides a common denominator in the concept of landscape thresholds dealing with all three layers of the landscape. Focused on the identity of landscape recognition and interpretation of the results by landscape thresholds LTA method constitutes a comprehensive toolbox for landscape and spatial planning purposes

Suggested Citation

  • Rędzińska, Katarzyna & Szulczewska, Barbara & Wolski, Przemysław, 2022. "The landscape thresholds analysis as an integrated approach to landscape interpretation for planning purposes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722001685
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722001685
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorota Sikora & Małgorzata Kaczyńska, 2021. "Landscape in transition: the case of the Royal Axis in Wilanów," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 467-495, July.
    2. Stephen Dobson & Paul Selman, 2012. "Applying Historic Landscape Characterization in Spatial Planning: from Remnants to Remanence," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 459-474.
    3. Krupowicz, Wioleta & Czarnecka, Adrianna & Grus, Magdalena, 2020. "Implementing crowdsourcing initiatives in land consolidation procedures in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Rędzińska, Katarzyna & Szulczewska, Barbara, 2019. "Landscape in change as perceived by its residents: A case study of Wilanow West in Warsaw," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 259-270.
    5. Katarzyna Pukowiec-Kurda & Urszula Myga-Piątek & Oimahmad Rahmonov, 2019. "The landscape profile method as a new tool for sustainable urban planning," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(14), pages 2548-2566, December.
    6. Aiello, Antonio & Ardone, Rita Grazia & Scopelliti, Massimiliano, 2010. "Neighbourhood planning improvement: Physical attributes, cognitive and affective evaluation and activities in two neighbourhoods in Rome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 264-275, August.
    7. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hana Vavrouchová & Antonín Vaishar & Veronika Peřinková, 2022. "Historical Landscape Elements of Abandoned Foothill Villages—A Case Study of the Historical Territory of Moravia and Silesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadja Penko Seidl & Mateja Šmid Hribar & Jelka Hudoklin & Tomaž Pipan & Mojca Golobič, 2021. "Defining Landscapes, and Their Importance for National Identity—A Case Study from Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Irena Medar-Tanjga & Mlađen Trifunović & Neda Živak & Aleksandra Petrašević, 2023. "The Role of Landscape in Sustainable Tourism Development—A Study of Identification and Evaluation of Landscape Qualities of the Vrbanja Basin in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Iga Solecka & Dietmar Bothmer & Arkadiusz Głogowski, 2019. "Recognizing Landscapes for the Purpose of Sustainable Development—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Iga Solecka & Piotr Krajewski & Aleksandra Krzyżanek & Ada Garczyńska, 2022. "Citizens’ Perceptions of Landscape Changes and Their Driving Forces: Evidence from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Péter Csorba & Krisztina Bánóczki & Zoltán Túri, 2022. "Land Use Changes in Peri-Urban Open Spaces of Small Towns in Eastern Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Yao Qian & Qingyuan Yang & Haozhe Zhang & Kangchuan Su & Huiming Zhang & Xiaochi Qu, 2022. "The Impact of Farming Households’ Livelihood Vulnerability on the Intention of Homestead Agglomeration: The Case of Zhongyi Township, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Amalia Vaneska Palacio Buendía & Yolanda Pérez-Albert & David Serrano Giné, 2021. "Mapping Landscape Perception: An Assessment with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Landscape Perception and Public Participation for the Conservation and Valorization of Cultural Landscapes: The Case of the Cinque Terre and Porto Venere UNESCO Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Agnieszka Cienciała & Szymon Sobura & Katarzyna Sobolewska-Mikulska, 2022. "Optimising Land Consolidation by Implementing UAV Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Vassiliki Vlami & Stamatis Zogaris & Hakan Djuma & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2019. "A Field Method for Landscape Conservation Surveying: The Landscape Assessment Protocol (LAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Yingxue Wang & Jiaheng Du & Jingxing Kuang & Chunxu Chen & Maobiao Li & Jin Wang, 2023. "Two-Scaled Identification of Landscape Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Vietnam Railway (Yunnan Section), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Joaquin Romano & Emilio Pérez-Chinarro & Byron V. Coral, 2020. "Network of Landscapes in the Sustainable Management of Transboundary Biosphere Reserves," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Katarzyna Pukowiec-Kurda & Hana Vavrouchová, 2020. "Land Cover Change and Landscape Transformations (2000–2018) in the Rural Municipalities of the Upper Silesia-Zagłębie Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Anne Cathrine Flyen, 2023. "A Cultural Landscape Emerges: Analyzing the Evolution of Two Historic North Pole Expedition Bases in Virgohamna, Svalbard, from Trash to a Protected Cultural Heritage Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, July.
    18. Maria Ignatieva & Fahimeh Mofrad, 2023. "Understanding Urban Green Spaces Typology’s Contribution to Comprehensive Green Infrastructure Planning: A Study of Canberra, the National Capital of Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Elena Moltchanova & Myroslava Lesiv & Linda See & Julie Mugford & Steffen Fritz, 2022. "Optimizing Crowdsourced Land Use and Land Cover Data Collection: A Two-Stage Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Yulian Pan & Yunong Wu & Xi Xu & Bin Zhang & Weifu Li, 2022. "Identifying Terrestrial Landscape Character Types in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722001685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.