IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6475-d570180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining Landscapes, and Their Importance for National Identity—A Case Study from Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Nadja Penko Seidl

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Mateja Šmid Hribar

    (Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jelka Hudoklin

    (The Spatial Planning Department, Acer Novo mesto d.o.o, SI-8000 Novo mesto, Slovenia)

  • Tomaž Pipan

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Mojca Golobič

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Although each landscape has its own identity, only some of them are recognized as nationally important because of their cultural and natural values and their contribution to national identity. In Slovenia, these landscapes are listed in the national Spatial Development Strategy (adopted in 2004). However, this list was neither supported by implementation instruments nor integrated in any conservation or management policy documents and was poorly integrated into spatial plans. The aim of this research was to renew the methodology for identifying landscapes of national importance. The methods included in-depth interviews with experts, an online questionnaire, participatory workshops, and field visits. The questionnaire results showed that only eight landscapes from the original list of 62 were explicitly recognized as nationally important, which confirmed the hypothesis that the initial method was not transparent and that the criteria were biased. The proposed approach included the following criteria: (1) representativeness, (2) the quality of the landscape features, and (3) the cultural and scientific value. The methodology was accompanied with the list of landscape features and landscape types that are important for Slovenian national identity; recommendations for implementing the method on national, regional, and local levels; and the general guidelines for spatial planning and management of these landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadja Penko Seidl & Mateja Šmid Hribar & Jelka Hudoklin & Tomaž Pipan & Mojca Golobič, 2021. "Defining Landscapes, and Their Importance for National Identity—A Case Study from Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6475-:d:570180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Warnock & Geoffrey Griffiths, 2015. "Landscape Characterisation: The Living Landscapes Approach in the UK," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 261-278, April.
    2. Hannu Linkola, 2015. "Administration, Landscape and Authorized Heritage Discourse - Contextualising the Nationally Valuable Landscape Areas of Finland," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 939-954, November.
    3. Derk Jan Stobbelaar & Bas Pedroli, 2011. "Perspectives on Landscape Identity: A Conceptual Challenge," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 321-339.
    4. Isabel Loupa Ramos & Paulo Bianchi & Fátima Bernardo & Veerle Van Eetvelde, 2019. "What matters to people? Exploring contents of landscape identity at the local scale," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 320-336, April.
    5. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    6. Ingrid Sarlöv Herlin, 2016. "Exploring the national contexts and cultural ideas that preceded the Landscape Character Assessment method in England," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 175-185, February.
    7. Ramos, Isabel Loupa & Bernardo, Fátima & Ribeiro, Sónia Carvalho & Van Eetvelde, Veerle, 2016. "Landscape identity: Implications for policy making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 36-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dragos Darabaneanu & Daniela Maci & Ionut Mihai Oprea, 2024. "Influence of Environmental Perception on Place Attachment in Romanian Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuang Zhao & Diechuan Yang & Chi Gao, 2023. "Identifying Landscape Character for Large Linear Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall in Ji-Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Andrew Lothian, 2022. "Visual Resource Stewardship—An International Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, March.
    4. Vassiliki Vlami & Stamatis Zogaris & Hakan Djuma & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2019. "A Field Method for Landscape Conservation Surveying: The Landscape Assessment Protocol (LAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Yuhan Shao & Eckart Lange & Kevin Thwaites & Zhenying Xue & Xinyu Xu, 2020. "Understanding Landscape Identity in the Context of Rapid Urban Change in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Ela Romov & Na’ama Teschner, 2022. "A Place under the Sun: Planning, Landscape and Participation in a Case of a Solar Powerplant in the Israeli Desert," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Raatikainen, Kaisa J. & Barron, Elizabeth S., 2017. "Current agri-environmental policies dismiss varied perceptions and discourses on management of traditional rural biotopes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 564-576.
    8. Manolaki, P. & Zotos, S. & Vogiatzakis, I.N., 2020. "An integrated ecological and cultural framework for landscape sensitivity assessment in Cyprus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    11. Ata Tara & Gillian Lawson & Wendy Davies & Alan Chenoweth & Georgina Pratten, 2024. "Integrating Landscape Character Assessment with Community Values in a Scenic Evaluation Methodology for Regional Landscape Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Irena Medar-Tanjga & Mlađen Trifunović & Neda Živak & Aleksandra Petrašević, 2023. "The Role of Landscape in Sustainable Tourism Development—A Study of Identification and Evaluation of Landscape Qualities of the Vrbanja Basin in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. František Petrovič & Martin Boltižiar & Iveta Rakytová & Ivana Tomčíková & Eva Pauditšová, 2021. "Long-Term Development Trend of the Historical Cultural Landscape of the UNESCO Monument: Vlkolínec (Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Rędzińska, Katarzyna & Szulczewska, Barbara & Wolski, Przemysław, 2022. "The landscape thresholds analysis as an integrated approach to landscape interpretation for planning purposes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Fangqi Tan & Tianyi Zhao, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Péter Csorba & Krisztina Bánóczki & Zoltán Túri, 2022. "Land Use Changes in Peri-Urban Open Spaces of Small Towns in Eastern Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Guglielmo Pristeri & Viviana di Martino & Silvia Ronchi & Stefano Salata & Francesca Mazza & Andrea Benedini & Andrea Arcidiacono, 2023. "An Operational Model to Downscale Regional Green Infrastructures in Supra-Local Plans: A Case Study in an Italian Alpine Sub-Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.
    18. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Amalia Vaneska Palacio Buendía & Yolanda Pérez-Albert & David Serrano Giné, 2021. "Mapping Landscape Perception: An Assessment with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Landscape Perception and Public Participation for the Conservation and Valorization of Cultural Landscapes: The Case of the Cinque Terre and Porto Venere UNESCO Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6475-:d:570180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.