IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i6d10.1007_s10668-023-04442-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing rural landscape diversity for management and conservation: a case study in Lichuan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yiyuan Sun

    (Huazhong Agricultural University
    Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs)

  • Beiming Zhang

    (Guangdong Enterprise Key Laboratory for Urban Sensing, Monitoring and Early Warning)

  • Kexin Lei

    (Hanyang District Landscaping Construction Management Station)

  • Yunong Wu

    (Southwest University)

  • Daimou Wei

    (Huazhong Agricultural University)

  • Bin Zhang

    (Huazhong Agricultural University
    Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs)

Abstract

As an important part of maintaining the diversity of territorial landscapes, rural landscape management and conservation faces many difficulties in the strategic background of China's rural revitalization. The existing methods for evaluating landscape diversity in administrative districts cannot meet the demand of "preserving the original appearance of the countryside". This paper is dedicated to exploring a spatial framework within which landscape diversity assessment methods can be applied to rural landscape management and conservation practices. We attempt to introduce landscape character assessment (LCA) as a spatial framework linking landscape diversity evaluation and landscape conservation and then update and improve a set of county-scale LCA classification and evaluation method. At the classification stage, a whole set of " landscape sample generation—landscape sample types classification—landscape description unit classification—landscape character types and areas classification " classification process system is built by combining the clustering method and automatic division method, and the boundary of landscape character areas and key landscape characteristics are obtained. At the evaluation stage, we have combined and improved the landscape diversity evaluation method and intrinsic and structural diversity were used to measure the landscape comprehensive diversity. And a matrix heat map was constructed to grade the landscape diversity vulnerability. Based on the evaluation results, we further proposed five landscape management and conservation strategies, namely “landscape transformation”, “landscape restoration”, “landscape enhancement”, “landscape maintenance” and "active conservation". This article verified this technical framework by taking Lichuan as an example, and its final results have strong correlation with the main functional zoning map of Lichuan. This study demonstrates the practicality and operability of using LCA as a spatial framework to link ecosystem approaches and management strategies. This research alleviates the difficulties in applying the ecosystem approach for the purpose of protecting key landscape characteristics. And it provides new requirements and new ideas for sustainable development of county-scale territorial spatial planning and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiyuan Sun & Beiming Zhang & Kexin Lei & Yunong Wu & Daimou Wei & Bin Zhang, 2025. "Assessing rural landscape diversity for management and conservation: a case study in Lichuan, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 14523-14551, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04442-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04442-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04442-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04442-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Warnock & Geoffrey Griffiths, 2015. "Landscape Characterisation: The Living Landscapes Approach in the UK," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 261-278, April.
    2. Yulian Pan & Yunong Wu & Xi Xu & Bin Zhang & Weifu Li, 2022. "Identifying Terrestrial Landscape Character Types in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Karimi, Azadeh & Yazdandad, Hossein & Fagerholm, Nora, 2020. "Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    4. Simensen, Trond & Halvorsen, Rune & Erikstad, Lars, 2018. "Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 557-569.
    5. Rachel Morrison & Adam Barker & John Handley, 2018. "Systems, habitats or places: evaluating the potential role of landscape character assessment in operationalising the ecosystem approach," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 1000-1012, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuang Zhao & Diechuan Yang & Chi Gao, 2023. "Identifying Landscape Character for Large Linear Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall in Ji-Town, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Nadja Penko Seidl & Mateja Šmid Hribar & Jelka Hudoklin & Tomaž Pipan & Mojca Golobič, 2021. "Defining Landscapes, and Their Importance for National Identity—A Case Study from Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Manolaki, P. & Zotos, S. & Vogiatzakis, I.N., 2020. "An integrated ecological and cultural framework for landscape sensitivity assessment in Cyprus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Yunong Wu, 2025. "Spatial Compatibility of Landscape Character State Assessment and Development Projects at County Scale: The Case of Songzi City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Nanxi Wang & Yan Zha & Zhongxiao Lin, 2025. "A Multiscale Approach to Identifying Vernacular Landscape Pattern Characteristics in River Basins: A Case Study of the Liuxi River, Guangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Irena Medar-Tanjga & Mlađen Trifunović & Neda Živak & Aleksandra Petrašević, 2023. "The Role of Landscape in Sustainable Tourism Development—A Study of Identification and Evaluation of Landscape Qualities of the Vrbanja Basin in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Rędzińska, Katarzyna & Szulczewska, Barbara & Wolski, Przemysław, 2022. "The landscape thresholds analysis as an integrated approach to landscape interpretation for planning purposes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Zizhen Hong & Wentao Cao & Ying Chen & Sijia Zhu & Wenjun Zheng, 2024. "Identifying Rural Landscape Heritage Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Li River Basin in Guilin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Péter Csorba & Krisztina Bánóczki & Zoltán Túri, 2022. "Land Use Changes in Peri-Urban Open Spaces of Small Towns in Eastern Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz & Malwina Michalik-Śnieżek, 2020. "The Methodology of Landscape Quality (LQ) Indicators Analysis Based on Remote Sensing Data: Polish National Parks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Annaêl Barnes & Alexandre Ickowicz & Jean-Daniel Cesaro & Paulo Salgado & Véronique Rayot & Sholpan Koldasbekova & Simon Taugourdeau, 2023. "Improving Biodiversity Offset Schemes through the Identification of Ecosystem Services at a Landscape Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Aikaterini Gkoltsiou, 2025. "Landscape Character Assessment for Sustainable Rural Development in Border Insular Areas: A Case Study of Ano Mirabello, Crete," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Amalia Vaneska Palacio Buendía & Yolanda Pérez-Albert & David Serrano Giné, 2021. "Mapping Landscape Perception: An Assessment with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Mauro Agnoletti, 2021. "Landscape Perception and Public Participation for the Conservation and Valorization of Cultural Landscapes: The Case of the Cinque Terre and Porto Venere UNESCO Site," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Theano S. Terkenli & Aikaterini Gkoltsiou & Dimitris Kavroudakis, 2021. "The Interplay of Objectivity and Subjectivity in Landscape Character Assessment: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis & Paraskevi Manolaki, 2017. "Investigating the Diversity and Variability of Eastern Mediterranean Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis & Maria Zomeni & A. M. Mannion, 2017. "Characterizing Islandscapes: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges Exemplified in the Mediterranean," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Andrew Lothian, 2022. "Visual Resource Stewardship—An International Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-38, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04442-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.