IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v126y2025ics0966692325001140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cycling cities: Measuring urban mobility mixing in bikeshare networks

Author

Listed:
  • Fraser, Timothy
  • Van Woert, Katherine
  • Olivieri, Sophia
  • Baron, Jonathan
  • Buckley, Katelyn
  • Lalli, Pamela

Abstract

To promote low-carbon transit, cities are increasingly adopting public-private partnerships to offer bikeshare services. But some neighborhoods use bikeshare services more than others, raising questions about how equitable these public programs' rollout has been. We examined the entire temporal directed network of individual rides from Boston's Bluebikes program, tracking bikers' starting and ending stations from 2011 to 2021. We hypothesized that ridership levels are lower between neighborhoods of color than white neighborhoods, and greater between wealthier neighborhoods than working class neighborhoods. We designed edgewise block permutation tests to measure the statistical significance of mobility between similar neighborhoods, while controlling through permutation blocks for population density, program geography, distance, and the distribution of race, wealth, education, and age. The network is deeply stratified by race and income, with more homophilous movement between neighborhoods from similar income brackets than expected due to chance. Race is linked to considerable homophily, but with low statistical significance. However, homophilous mobility by income and race has dropped sharply from 2011 to 2021, suggesting that Bluebikes is gradually reaching a broader range of neighborhoods. This presents signs of hope for a transition to equitable transit options in other major US cities as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Fraser, Timothy & Van Woert, Katherine & Olivieri, Sophia & Baron, Jonathan & Buckley, Katelyn & Lalli, Pamela, 2025. "Cycling cities: Measuring urban mobility mixing in bikeshare networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:126:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325001140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325001140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Gender gap generators for bike share ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike system in New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Goodman, Anna & Cheshire, James, 2014. "Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 272-279.
    3. Alex Karner & Rafael H. M. Pereira & Steven Farber, 2024. "Correction to: Advances and pitfalls in measuring transportation equityTransportation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1179-1179, June.
    4. Alex Cobham & Andrew Sumner, 2013. "Is it all about the tails? The Palma measure of income inequality," Working Papers 308, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    5. Milena Adaros-Boye & Daniel Duclos-Bastías & Frano Giakoni-Ramírez & Luis Espinoza-Oteiza & Carolina Cid-Robles & Jorge Gálvez-Carvajal. & Carlos Matus-Castillo, 2021. "Promoting Sustainable Mobility: Impact of an Urban Biking Programme on University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-9, November.
    6. Qian, Xiaodong & Jaller, Miguel, 2020. "Bikesharing, equity, and disadvantaged communities: A case study in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 354-371.
    7. J. Hunt & J. Abraham, 2007. "Influences on bicycle use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 453-470, July.
    8. Klein, Nicholas J. & Tran, Minh & Riley, Sarah, 2020. "“Desperately Need a Car”: Analyzing Crowdfunding Campaigns for Car Purchases and Repairs on Gofundme.com," SocArXiv 8x7d2, Center for Open Science.
    9. Stéphanie Souche & Aurelie Mercier & Nicolas Ovtracht, 2016. "The impacts of urban pricing on social and spatial inequalities: The case study of Lyon (France)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 373-399, February.
    10. Xiaolu Zhou, 2015. "Understanding Spatiotemporal Patterns of Biking Behavior by Analyzing Massive Bike Sharing Data in Chicago," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Qian, Xiaodong & Niemeier, Deb, 2019. "High impact prioritization of bikeshare program investment to improve disadvantaged communities' access to jobs and essential services," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 52-70.
    12. Shahram Heydari & Garyfallos Konstantinoudis & Abdul Wahid Behsoodi, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Shahram Heydari & Garyfallos Konstantinoudis & Abdul Wahid Behsoodi, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London," Papers 2107.11589, arXiv.org.
    14. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1252-1259.
    15. Karen Lucas & Bert Wee & Kees Maat, 2016. "A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 473-490, May.
    16. Esteban Moro & Dan Calacci & Xiaowen Dong & Alex Pentland, 2021. "Mobility patterns are associated with experienced income segregation in large US cities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Annie Doubleday & Youngjun Choe & Tania Busch Isaksen & Scott Miles & Nicole A Errett, 2021. "How did outdoor biking and walking change during COVID-19?: A case study of three U.S. cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Dong Liu & Mei-Po Kwan & Zihan Kan, 2022. "Assessing job-access inequity for transit-based workers across space and race with the Palma ratio," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 746-772, October.
    19. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    20. Alex Cobham, Andy Sumner, 2013. "Is It All About the Tails? The Palma Measure of Income Inequality-Working Paper 343," Working Papers 343, Center for Global Development.
    21. repec:osf:socarx:ap7wh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach," SocArXiv ap7wh, Center for Open Science.
    23. Meng, Si'an & Brown, Anne, 2021. "Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    24. Mooney, Stephen J. & Hosford, Kate & Howe, Bill & Yan, An & Winters, Meghan & Bassok, Alon & Hirsch, Jana A., 2019. "Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-96.
    25. repec:osf:socarx:8x7d2_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Ying Zhang & Tom Thomas & M J G Brussel & M F A M van Maarseveen, 2016. "Expanding Bicycle-Sharing Systems: Lessons Learnt from an Analysis of Usage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    2. Meng, Si'an & Brown, Anne, 2021. "Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Alex Karner & Rafael H. M. Pereira & Steven Farber, 2025. "Advances and pitfalls in measuring transportation equity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1399-1427, August.
    4. Jin, Scarlett T. & Sui, Daniel Z., 2024. "Bikesharing and equity: A nationwide study of bikesharing accessibility in the U.S," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Karner, Alex & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Farber, Steven, 2023. "Advances and pitfalls in measuring transportation equity," SocArXiv y246u, Center for Open Science.
    6. Si’an Meng & Anne Brown, 2025. "How shared e-scooter programs affect docked bikeshare ridership in communities of concern: a tale of two cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1767-1791, August.
    7. Chen, Zhiwei & Li, Xiaopeng, 2021. "Unobserved heterogeneity in transportation equity analysis: Evidence from a bike-sharing system in southern Tampa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Berke, Alex & Truitt, Walter & Larson, Kent, 2024. "Is access to public bike-share networks equitable? A multiyear spatial analysis across 5 U.S. Cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Zhou, Zhaoqi & Schwanen, Tim, 2024. "Exploring the production of spatial inequality in dockless bicycle sharing in Shenzhen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Javad J. C. Aman & Myriam Zakhem & Janille Smith-Colin, 2021. "Towards Equity in Micromobility: Spatial Analysis of Access to Bikes and Scooters amongst Disadvantaged Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Su, Lin & Yan, Xiang & Zhao, Xilei, 2024. "Spatial equity of micromobility systems: A comparison of shared E-scooters and docked bikeshare in Washington DC," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 25-36.
    12. Freiberg, Germán & Giannotti, Mariana & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2024. "Are mass transit projects and public transport planning overlooking uneven distributional effects? Empirical evidence from Sao Paulo, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    13. Willberg, Elias & Salonen, Maria & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2021. "What do trip data reveal about bike-sharing system users?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Qian, Xiaodong & Jaller, Miguel & Niemeier, Debbie, 2020. "Enhancing equitable service level: Which can address better, dockless or dock-based Bikeshare systems?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Saud, Veronica & Thomopoulos, Nikolas, 2021. "Towards inclusive transport landscapes: Re-visualising a Bicycle Sharing Scheme in Santiago Metropolitan Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Namkung, Ok Stella & Park, Jonghan & Ko, Joonho, 2023. "Public bike users’ annual travel distance: Findings from combined data of user survey and annual rental records," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Duran-Rodas, David & Villeneuve, Dominic & Pereira, Francisco C. & Wulfhorst, Gebhard, 2020. "How fair is the allocation of bike-sharing infrastructure? Framework for a qualitative and quantitative spatial fairness assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 299-319.
    18. Wang, Jueyu & Lindsey, Greg, 2019. "Neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and bike share member patterns of use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Gao, Jing & Li, Sen, 2024. "Synergizing shared micromobility and public transit towards an equitable multimodal transportation network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Ahmed, Naser & Jui, Jesmin & Liu, Dong & Kim, Kyusik & Kim, Junghwan & Lee, Jinhyung, 2025. "Understanding inequalities in geographic accessibility to emergency cyclone shelters in Bangladesh under climate change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:126:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325001140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.