IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v17y1989i6p595-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for single machine multiple objective sequencing research

Author

Listed:
  • Fry, TD
  • Armstrong, RD
  • Lewis, H

Abstract

The majority of single machine sequencing research has assumed that only one objective is to be minimized. The research involving multiple objectives has been limited. Recent studies have shown, however, that production managers often consider multiple objectives when making scheduling decisions. The primary reason for the lack of literature on multiple objective scheduling is the additional complexity encountered when determining the 'best' solution. Although a host of general multiple objective optimization procedures exists, the vast majority cannot be efficiently applied to the multiple objective single machine sequencing problem. Most procedures assume continuous decision variables, whereas the single machine sequencing problem requires integer variables. While some of these procedures could be altered to directly address integer models, the overall combinatorial nature of most sequencing problems limits the applicability to sequencing. A comprehensive review of the published literature on the multiple objective single machine sequencing problem is presented in this paper. A framework is presented to categorize each piece of research. Gaps in the body of research are indicated and recommendations are made for areas of future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Fry, TD & Armstrong, RD & Lewis, H, 1989. "A framework for single machine multiple objective sequencing research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 595-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:6:p:595-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(89)90063-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching‐Jong Liao & Cheng‐Hsing Chuang, 1996. "Sequencing with setup time and order tardiness trade‐offs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(7), pages 971-984, October.
    2. T'kindt, V. & Billaut, J-C. & Proust, C., 2001. "Solving a bicriteria scheduling problem on unrelated parallel machines occurring in the glass bottle industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 42-49, November.
    3. Hoogeveen, Han, 2005. "Multicriteria scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 592-623, December.
    4. Adamopoulos, George I. & Pappis, Costas P., 1996. "A fuzzy-linguistic approach to a multi-criteria sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 628-636, August.
    5. Sivrikaya-Serifoglu, Funda & Ulusoy, Gunduz, 1998. "A bicriteria two-machine permutation flowshop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 414-430, June.
    6. Toktas, Berkin & Azizoglu, Meral & Koksalan, Suna Kondakci, 2004. "Two-machine flow shop scheduling with two criteria: Maximum earliness and makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 286-295, September.
    7. T'kindt, Vincent & Monmarche, Nicolas & Tercinet, Fabrice & Laugt, Daniel, 2002. "An Ant Colony Optimization algorithm to solve a 2-machine bicriteria flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 250-257, October.
    8. Hesaraki, Alireza F. & Dellaert, Nico P. & de Kok, Ton, 2019. "Generating outpatient chemotherapy appointment templates with balanced flowtime and makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 304-318.
    9. Subhash C. Sarin & Divya Prakash, 2004. "Equal Processing Time Bicriteria Scheduling on Parallel Machines," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 227-240, September.
    10. Awi Federgruen & Gur Mosheiov, 1993. "Simultaneous optimization of efficiency and performance balance measures in single‐machine scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 951-970, December.
    11. M. Murat Köksalan, 1999. "A heuristic approach to bicriteria scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(7), pages 777-789, October.
    12. Haral, Uday & Chen, Rew-Win & Ferrell, William Jr & Kurz, Mary Beth, 2007. "Multiobjective single machine scheduling with nontraditional requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 574-584, April.
    13. Brandimarte, Paolo, 1999. "Exploiting process plan flexibility in production scheduling: A multi-objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 59-71, April.
    14. Arroyo, Jose Elias Claudio & Armentano, Vinicius Amaral, 2005. "Genetic local search for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 717-738, December.
    15. Nagar, Amit & Haddock, Jorge & Heragu, Sunderesh, 1995. "Multiple and bicriteria scheduling: A literature survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 88-104, February.
    16. Erenay, Fatih Safa & Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Toptal, Aysegül & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, 2010. "New solution methods for single machine bicriteria scheduling problem: Minimization of average flowtime and number of tardy jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 89-98, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:6:p:595-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.