IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v155y2017icp317-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate dependence modeling based on comonotonic factors

Author

Listed:
  • Hua, Lei
  • Joe, Harry

Abstract

Comonotonic latent variables are introduced into general factor models, in order to allow non-linear transformations of latent factors, so that various multivariate dependence structures can be captured. Through decomposing each univariate marginal into several components, and letting some components belong to different sets of comonotonic latent variables, a great variety of multivariate models can be constructed, and their induced copulas can be used to model various multivariate dependence structures. The paper focuses on an extension of Archimedean copulas constructed by Laplace Transforms of positive random variables. The corresponding comonotonic factor models with one set of comonotonic latent variables and multiple sets of comonotonic latent variables are studied. In particular, we propose several parametric comonotonic factor models that are useful in accommodating both within-group and between-group dependence with possible asymmetric tail dependence. Numerical methods for estimation with the resulting copula models are discussed. There is an application using a dataset of body composition measurements to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed parsimonious dependence models.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua, Lei & Joe, Harry, 2017. "Multivariate dependence modeling based on comonotonic factors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 317-333.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:155:y:2017:i:c:p:317-333
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2017.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X17300222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jmva.2017.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong Hwan Oh & Andrew J. Patton, 2017. "Modeling Dependence in High Dimensions With Factor Copulas," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 139-154, January.
    2. Joe, Harry & Sang, Peijun, 2016. "Multivariate models for dependent clusters of variables with conditional independence given aggregation variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 114-132.
    3. Karl Holzinger & Frances Swineford, 1937. "The Bi-factor method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 2(1), pages 41-54, March.
    4. Anastasios Panagiotelis & Claudia Czado & Harry Joe, 2012. "Pair Copula Constructions for Multivariate Discrete Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1063-1072, September.
    5. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    6. Krupskii, Pavel & Joe, Harry, 2015. "Structured factor copula models: Theory, inference and computation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 53-73.
    7. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    8. Hua, Lei, 2015. "Tail negative dependence and its applications for aggregate loss modeling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-145.
    9. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2007. "The t copula with Multiple Parameters of Degrees of Freedom: Bivariate Characteristics and Application to Risk Management," Papers 0710.3959, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2010.
    10. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel Shevchenko, 2010. "The t copula with multiple parameters of degrees of freedom: bivariate characteristics and application to risk management," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(9), pages 1039-1054.
    11. McNeil, Alexander J. & Neslehová, Johanna, 2010. "From Archimedean to Liouville copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(8), pages 1772-1790, September.
    12. Yang, Xipei & Frees, Edward W. & Zhang, Zhengjun, 2011. "A generalized beta copula with applications in modeling multivariate long-tailed data," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 265-284, September.
    13. Aas, Kjersti & Czado, Claudia & Frigessi, Arnoldo & Bakken, Henrik, 2009. "Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 182-198, April.
    14. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    15. Krupskii, Pavel & Joe, Harry, 2013. "Factor copula models for multivariate data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 85-101.
    16. Hua, Lei & Joe, Harry, 2011. "Tail order and intermediate tail dependence of multivariate copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1454-1471, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hua, Lei & Polansky, Alan & Pramanik, Paramahansa, 2019. "Assessing bivariate tail non-exchangeable dependence," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Perreault, Samuel & Duchesne, Thierry & Nešlehová, Johanna G., 2019. "Detection of block-exchangeable structure in large-scale correlation matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 400-422.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ackerer Damien & Vatter Thibault, 2017. "Dependent defaults and losses with factor copula models," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 375-399, December.
    2. Su, Jianxi & Hua, Lei, 2017. "A general approach to full-range tail dependence copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 49-64.
    3. Brechmann, Eike & Czado, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2014. "Flexible dependence modeling of operational risk losses and its impact on total capital requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 271-285.
    4. Hua, Lei, 2017. "On a bivariate copula with both upper and lower full-range tail dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 94-104.
    5. Nguyen, Hoang & Ausín, M. Concepción & Galeano, Pedro, 2020. "Variational inference for high dimensional structured factor copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Kreuzer, Alexander & Czado, Claudia, 2021. "Bayesian inference for a single factor copula stochastic volatility model using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 130-150.
    7. Krupskii, Pavel & Joe, Harry, 2015. "Structured factor copula models: Theory, inference and computation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 53-73.
    8. Hua, Lei & Joe, Harry, 2012. "Tail comonotonicity: Properties, constructions, and asymptotic additivity of risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 492-503.
    9. Zheng Wei & Seongyong Kim & Boseung Choi & Daeyoung Kim, 2019. "Multivariate Skew Normal Copula for Asymmetric Dependence: Estimation and Application," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 365-387, January.
    10. Takaaki Koike & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2022. "Joint mixability and notions of negative dependence," Papers 2204.11438, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    11. Krupskii, Pavel & Joe, Harry, 2020. "Flexible copula models with dynamic dependence and application to financial data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 148-167.
    12. Damien Ackerer & Thibault Vatter, 2016. "Dependent Defaults and Losses with Factor Copula Models," Papers 1610.03050, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    13. Tachibana, Minoru, 2022. "Safe haven assets for international stock markets: A regime-switching factor copula approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Barczy, Mátyás & K. Nedényi, Fanni & Sütő, László, 2023. "Probability equivalent level of Value at Risk and higher-order Expected Shortfalls," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-128.
    15. Aristidis Nikoloulopoulos & Harry Joe, 2015. "Factor Copula Models for Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 126-150, March.
    16. Pavel Krupskii, 2017. "Copula-based measures of reflection and permutation asymmetry and statistical tests," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1165-1187, December.
    17. Hua, Lei, 2015. "Tail negative dependence and its applications for aggregate loss modeling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-145.
    18. Su, Jianxi & Furman, Edward, 2017. "Multiple risk factor dependence structures: Copulas and related properties," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 109-121.
    19. Manner, Hans & Stark, Florian & Wied, Dominik, 2019. "Testing for structural breaks in factor copula models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 324-345.
    20. Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Giammusso, Davide & Puccetti, Giovanni, 2018. "A clustering approach and a rule of thumb for risk aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-248.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:155:y:2017:i:c:p:317-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.