IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v135y2025ics0306919225001460.html

Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing

Author

Listed:
  • Kininmonth, Alice R.
  • Jenneson, Victoria L.
  • Pontin, Francesca
  • Halford, Jason C.G.
  • Johnstone, Alexandra M.
  • Morris, Michelle A.
  • Fildes, Alison

Abstract

Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kininmonth, Alice R. & Jenneson, Victoria L. & Pontin, Francesca & Halford, Jason C.G. & Johnstone, Alexandra M. & Morris, Michelle A. & Fildes, Alison, 2025. "Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0306919225001460
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stone, Rebecca A. & Christiansen, Paul & Johnstone, Alexandra M. & Brown, Adrian & Douglas, Flora & Hardman, Charlotte A., 2025. "Understanding the barriers to purchasing healthier, more environmentally sustainable food for people living with obesity and varying experiences of food insecurity in the UK," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Bang, H. Min & Shu, Suzanne B. & Weber, Elke U., 2020. "The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 50-70, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Schütze & Carsten Spitzer & Philipp C. Wichardt & Philipp Christoph Wichardt, 2023. "Nudging: An Experiment on Transparency, Controlling for Reactance and Decision Time," CESifo Working Paper Series 10599, CESifo.
    2. Milfeld, Tyler & Packer, Olivia, 2025. "Marketplace power and choice framing: How and when CSR surcharges generate consumer anger," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Runxi Zeng & Di Zhu & Richard Evans, 2026. "When algorithms fail us: perceived algorithmic ineffectiveness, psychological reactance, and implicit personality as drivers of algorithm aversion behavior on short-form video platforms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Schütze, Tobias & Spitzer, Carsten & Wichardt, Philipp C., 2025. "Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Paunov, Yavor & Grüne-Yanoff, Till, 2026. "Boosts vs nudges: perceived effectiveness and criticism shape preferences for sustainable behavioural policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PA).
    6. Mills, Stuart, 2022. "Finding the ‘nudge’ in hypernudge," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Zhang, Lina & Yang, Haolin & Chen, Yixin & Chiu, Yung-ho & Pang, Qinghua & Sun, Chenyu & Shi, Zhen, 2025. "Assessing water-energy-food nexus efficiency for food security planning in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0306919225001460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.