IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfinec/v8y1980i4p363-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ex ante analysis of put-call parity

Author

Listed:
  • Klemkosky, Robert C.
  • Resnick, Bruce G.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Klemkosky, Robert C. & Resnick, Bruce G., 1980. "An ex ante analysis of put-call parity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 363-378, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:8:y:1980:i:4:p:363-378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304-405X(80)90008-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert A. Jarrow, 2015. "Asset Price Bubbles," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 201-218, December.
    2. Don M. Chance, 1988. "Boundary Condition Tests Of Bid And Ask Prices Of Index Call Options," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 11(1), pages 21-31, March.
    3. George M. Frankfurter & Wai K. Leung, 1991. "Further Analysis Of The Put-Call Parity Implied Risk-Free Interest Rate," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 14(3), pages 217-232, September.
    4. Steven Li & Elia Alfay, 2006. "Evidence on the arbitrage efficiency of SPI index futures and options markets," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 13(1), pages 71-93, March.
    5. Steven Li & Elia Alfay, 2005. "Evidence on the arbitrage efficiency of SPI index futures and options markets," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 194, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    6. J. Board & C. Sutcliffe & E. Patrinos, 2000. "The performance of covered calls," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17.
    7. Cerreia-Vioglio, S. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M., 2015. "Put–Call Parity and market frictions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 730-762.
    8. Liu, Dehong & Qiu, Qi & Hughen, J. Christopher & Lung, Peter, 2019. "Price discovery in the price disagreement between equity and option markets: Evidence from SSE ETF50 options of China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 557-571.
    9. Jianfeng Hu, 2020. "Is the synthetic stock price really lower than actual price?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(12), pages 1809-1824, December.
    10. Debaditya Mohanti & P. K. Priyan, 2014. "An Empirical Test of Market Efficiency of Indian Index Options Market Using the Black–Scholes Model and Dynamic Hedging Strategy," Paradigm, , vol. 18(2), pages 221-237, December.
    11. Abel Rodr�guez & Enrique ter Horst, 2011. "Measuring expectations in options markets: an application to the S&P500 index," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(9), pages 1393-1405, July.
    12. Ben David Nissim & Tavor Tchahi, 2011. "An empirical test of 'put call parity'," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(22), pages 1661-1664.
    13. Blomeyer, Edward C. & Boyd, James C., 1995. "Efficiency tests of options on Treasury bond futures contracts at the Chicago Board of Trade," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 4(2-3), pages 169-181.
    14. Geoffrey F. Loudon, 1988. "Put Call Parity Theory: Evidence From The Big Australian," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 13(1), pages 53-67, June.
    15. Longarela, Iñaki R. & Mayoral, Silvia, 2015. "Quote inefficiency in options markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 23-36.
    16. Louis Cheng & Jay White, 2003. "Measuring Pricing Inefficiencies Under Stressful Market Conditions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3‐4), pages 383-411, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:8:y:1980:i:4:p:363-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.