IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaecon/v81y2026i2s0165410125000709.html

Critical audit matters and internal control quality: The disciplining role of CAM reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Dee, Carol Callaway
  • Luo, Bing
  • Wang, Elaine
  • Zhang, Jing

Abstract

We examine whether critical audit matter (CAM) reporting improves internal controls over financial reporting. We propose that CAM reporting improves internal control quality. This is because CAM reporting incentivizes early identification and communication of internal control issues among auditors, management, and audit committees, and increases their attention and effort in high-risk CAM areas. We find that, compared to control companies, companies that implement CAM reporting experience a significant decrease in the likelihood of internal control material weaknesses (ICMWs), and the improvement in internal control quality is primarily at account-level rather than entity-level controls. We also find that CAM reporting significantly lowers the likelihood of accounting misstatements. Cross-sectional analyses suggest that the benefit of CAM reporting on internal control quality depends on audit committee quality and auditor effort. The survey results of audit partners and CFOs provide further support for our theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Dee, Carol Callaway & Luo, Bing & Wang, Elaine & Zhang, Jing, 2026. "Critical audit matters and internal control quality: The disciplining role of CAM reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:81:y:2026:i:2:s0165410125000709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410125000709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:81:y:2026:i:2:s0165410125000709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.