IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v30y2019ic19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recounting the role of emotions in learning economics: Using the Threshold Concepts Framework to explore affective dimensions of students’ learning

Author

Listed:
  • Goebel, Jessica
  • Maistry, Suriamurthee

Abstract

Many students find economics difficult. Undergraduate courses often record high failure rates, and research in economics education reflects concerns about the quality of students’ learning. Such concerns may be more acute in the South African context, where academic underpreparedness among students is one of many challenges facing higher education. Despite the emotional connotations of difficulty and challenge frequently associated with economics, affective aspects of learning are seldom considered explicitly in the design of pedagogy and curriculum. Likewise, emotions barely feature in research on teaching and learning in economics. The Threshold Concepts Framework (TCF) offers a view of learning that encompasses both cognitive and affective elements. This approach is increasingly influential within and beyond the discipline in exploring qualitative dimensions of learning. However, this scholarship has yet to delve deeply into emotional aspects of learning in economics. This paper draws on a study that explored the processes and experiences of economics students’ learning in a threshold concepts-infused tutorial programme that complemented a traditionally lectured Intermediate Microeconomics course at a South African university. The study used Interactive Qualitative Analysis (IQA), in which participants themselves generate and analyze data representing their experiences. Students were deeply involved in exploring their learning, in focus groups, individual interviews, and written reflections. These sources produced detailed representations, in the participants’ voices, of their learning in economics. We offer an account of the range of emotional responses they described, foregrounding their words. These descriptions depict learning in economics as a strongly affective process, coloured by a rich wash of emotions, both positive and painful. These responses stemmed from engaging with disciplinary content, from pedagogy and assessment practices, and from students’ views of themselves as learners in the discipline. Emotions in turn affected students’ motivation, learning behaviour and outcomes. We reflect on how these findings might inform teaching approaches that support and facilitate disciplinary learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Goebel, Jessica & Maistry, Suriamurthee, 2019. "Recounting the role of emotions in learning economics: Using the Threshold Concepts Framework to explore affective dimensions of students’ learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:30:y:2019:i:c:19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2018.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388017300865
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2018.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morroni, Mario & Soliani, Riccardo, 2022. "Theatrical readings as a means of learning economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Sarah A. Jacobson & Luyao Zhang & Jiasheng Zhu, 2022. "The Right Tool for the Job: Matching Active Learning Techniques to Learning Objectives," Papers 2205.03393, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Emotion; Affect; Threshold concepts; Qualitative research; Student experience; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:30:y:2019:i:c:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.