IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v85y2019icp205-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach to merit rating by means of autoregressive sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Martinek, László
  • Arató, N. Miklós

Abstract

A posteriori ratemaking is widely applied in the premium calculation of property and casualty products, particularly in third-party automobile insurance, which usually uses a bonus–malus system for premium adjustment. The present paper suggests an alternative to common frameworks that are designed as random walks on graphs of mostly finite states representing premium levels. The proposed premium calculation model is governed by the policyholder’s claim history through a recursive equation. This new autoregressive scheme is structurally different from the ones in use. Relevant metrics that measure the system’s optimality are evaluated, partially in analytical form. Through a comparison with existing models and parameterisation from real-life data, the new model is put into context and its practical relevance is investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinek, László & Arató, N. Miklós, 2019. "An approach to merit rating by means of autoregressive sequences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 205-217.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:205-217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668718301185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dionne, Georges & Vanasse, Charles, 1989. "A Generalization of Automobile Insurance Rating Models: The Negative Binomial Distribution with a Regression Component," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 199-212, November.
    2. Tzougas, George & Vrontos, Spyridon & Frangos, Nicholas, 2014. "Optimal Bonus-Malus Systems Using Finite Mixture Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 417-444, May.
    3. Coene, Geert & Doray, Louis G., 1996. "A financially Balanced Bonus/Malus System," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 107-116, May.
    4. Tan, Chong It & Li, Jackie & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Balasooriya, Uditha, 2015. "Optimal relativities and transition rules of a bonus–malus system," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 255-263.
    5. Tzougas, George & Vrontos, Spyridon & Frangos, Nicholas, 2014. "Optimal Bonus-Malus Systems using finite mixture models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70919, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Arthur Charpentier & Arthur David & Romuald Elie, 2017. "Optimal Claiming Strategies in Bonus Malus Systems and Implied Markov Chains," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Yip, Karen C.H. & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2005. "On modeling claim frequency data in general insurance with extra zeros," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 153-163, April.
    8. Jean-Philippe Boucher & Michel Denuit & Montserrat Guillén, 2007. "Risk Classification for Claim Counts," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 110-131.
    9. Loimaranta, K., 1972. "Some asymptotic properties of bonus systems," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 233-245, May.
    10. Lemaire, Jean & Zi, Hongmin, 1994. "A Comparative Analysis of 30 Bonus-Malus Systems," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 287-309, November.
    11. Søren Asmussen, 2014. "Modeling and Performance of Bonus-Malus Systems: Stationarity versus Age-Correction," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Chong It, 2016. "Varying transition rules in bonus–malus systems: From rules specification to determination of optimal relativities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 134-140.
    2. Tzougas, George & Hoon, W. L. & Lim, J. M., 2019. "The negative binomial-inverse Gaussian regression model with an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. George Tzougas, 2020. "EM Estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma Regression Model with Varying Dispersion: An Application to Insurance Ratemaking," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Tzougas, George, 2020. "EM estimation for the Poisson-Inverse Gamma regression model with varying dispersion: an application to insurance ratemaking," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Tan, Chong It & Li, Jackie & Li, Johnny Siu-Hang & Balasooriya, Uditha, 2015. "Optimal relativities and transition rules of a bonus–malus system," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 255-263.
    6. Tzougas, George & Karlis, Dimitris & Frangos, Nicholas, 2017. "Confidence intervals of the premiums of optimal Bonus Malus Systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70926, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Oh, Rosy & Lee, Kyung Suk & Park, Sojung C. & Ahn, Jae Youn, 2020. "Double-counting problem of the bonus–malus system," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 141-155.
    8. Olena Ragulina, 2017. "Bonus--malus systems with different claim types and varying deductibles," Papers 1707.00917, arXiv.org.
    9. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    10. Payandeh Najafabadi Amir T. & MohammadPour Saeed, 2018. "A k-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixture Regression Model: Application to Rate–Making Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, July.
    11. Tzougas, George & Vrontos, Spyridon & Frangos, Nicholas, 2018. "Bonus-Malus systems with two component mixture models arising from different parametric families," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84301, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. David Mihaela & Jemna Dănuţ-Vasile, 2015. "Modeling the Frequency of Auto Insurance Claims by Means of Poisson and Negative Binomial Models," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 62(2), pages 151-168, July.
    13. Tzougas, George & Yik, Woo Hee & Mustaqeem, Muhammad Waqar, 2019. "Insurance ratemaking using the Exponential-Lognormal regression model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101729, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Mahmoudvand Rahim & Tan Chong It & Abbasi Narges, 2017. "Adjusting the Premium Relativities in a Bonus-Malus System: An Integrated Approach Using the First Claim Time and the Number of Claims," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Mihaela DAVID, 2014. "Modeling The Frequency Of Claims In Auto Insurance With Application To A French Case," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 13, pages 69-85, June.
    16. Søren Asmussen, 2014. "Modeling and Performance of Bonus-Malus Systems: Stationarity versus Age-Correction," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Makariou, Despoina & Barrieu, Pauline & Tzougas, George, 2021. "A finite mixture modelling perspective for combining experts’ opinions with an application to quantile-based risk measures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110763, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Lee, Woojoo & Kim, Jeonghwan & Ahn, Jae Youn, 2020. "The Poisson random effect model for experience ratemaking: Limitations and alternative solutions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 26-36.
    19. Darren Shannon & Tim Jannusch & Florian David‐Spickermann & Martin Mullins & Martin Cunneen & Finbarr Murphy, 2021. "Connected and autonomous vehicle injury loss events: Potential risk and actuarial considerations for primary insurers," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(1), pages 5-35, March.
    20. Lluís Bermúdez & Dimitris Karlis & Isabel Morillo, 2020. "Modelling Unobserved Heterogeneity in Claim Counts Using Finite Mixture Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:85:y:2019:i:c:p:205-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.