IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v17y1995i2p101-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theory of risk, return and solvency

Author

Listed:
  • Powers, Michael R.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Powers, Michael R., 1995. "A theory of risk, return and solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 101-118, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:17:y:1995:i:2:p:101-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-6687(95)00006-E
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bohman, H., 1972. "Risk theory and Wiener processes," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 96-99, December.
    2. Garrido, Jose, 1989. "Stochastic differential equations for compounded risk reserves," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 165-173, November.
    3. William B. Fairley, 1979. "Investment Income and Profit Margins in Property-Liability Insurance: Theory and Empirical Results," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 192-210, Spring.
    4. Harrison, J. Michael, 1977. "Ruin problems with compounding assets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 67-79, February.
    5. Abikhalil, F., 1986. "Finite Time Ruin Problems for Perturbed Experience Rating and Connection with Discounting Risk Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 33-43, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Powers & Martin Shubik & Shun Yao, 1998. "Insurance market games: Scale effects and public policy," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 109-134, June.
    2. Mousa, A.S. & Pinheiro, D. & Pinto, A.A., 2016. "Optimal life-insurance selection and purchase within a market of several life-insurance providers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-141.
    3. Adekambi Franck, 2013. "The Asymptotic Ruin Problem in Health Care Insurance with Interest," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 143-162, July.
    4. Eling, Martin & Gatzert, Nadine & Schmeiser, Hato, 2009. "Minimum standards for investment performance: A new perspective on non-life insurer solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 113-122, August.
    5. Martin Eling & Denis Toplek, 2009. "Modeling and Management of Nonlinear Dependencies–Copulas in Dynamic Financial Analysis," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 651-681, September.
    6. Adekambi Franck & Mamane Salha, 2012. "Health Care Insurance Pricing Using Alternating Renewal Processes," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Benjamin Avanzi & Lewis de Felice, 2023. "Optimal Strategies for the Decumulation of Retirement Savings under Differing Appetites for Liquidity and Investment Risks," Papers 2312.14355, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    8. Burren, Daniel, 2013. "Insurance demand and welfare-maximizing risk capital—Some hints for the regulator in the case of exponential preferences and exponential claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 551-568.
    9. Powers, Michael R. & Shubik, Martin, 1998. "On the tradeoff between the law of large numbers and oligopoly in insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 141-156, November.
    10. Hato Schmeiser, 2004. "New Risk‐Based Capital Standards in the European Union: A Proposal Based on Empirical Data," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 41-52, March.
    11. Asier Garayeta & J. Iñaki De la Peña & Eduardo Trigo, 2022. "Towards a Global Solvency Model in the Insurance Market: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek A. Teuerle & Aleksandra Wilkowska, 2022. "Diffusion Approximations of the Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model Driven by a Renewal Process," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Norberg, Ragnar, 1999. "Ruin problems with assets and liabilities of diffusion type," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 255-269, June.
    3. Peter Brusov & Tatiana Filatova & Natali Orekhova, 2023. "Capital Structure Theory: Past, Present, Future," Springer Books, in: The Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova Theory of Capital Structure, chapter 0, pages 9-50, Springer.
    4. Fredj Jawadi & Catherine Bruneau & Nadia Sghaier, 2009. "Nonlinear Cointegration Relationships Between Non‐Life Insurance Premiums and Financial Markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 753-783, September.
    5. Gjessing, Håkon K. & Paulsen, Jostein, 1997. "Present value distributions with applications to ruin theory and stochastic equations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 123-144, October.
    6. Georges Dionne & Scott Harrington, 2017. "Insurance and Insurance Markets," Working Papers 17-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    7. Anne Gron & Deborah J. Lucas, 1998. "External Financing and Insurance Cycles," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Property-Casualty Insurance, pages 5-28, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Yuchao Dong & Jérôme Spielmann, 2020. "Weak Limits of Random Coefficient Autoregressive Processes and their Application in Ruin Theory," Post-Print hal-02170829, HAL.
    9. Luo, Shangzhen & Taksar, Michael & Tsoi, Allanus, 2008. "On reinsurance and investment for large insurance portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-444, February.
    10. Yuen, Kam C. & Wang, Guojing & Ng, Kai W., 2004. "Ruin probabilities for a risk process with stochastic return on investments," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 259-274, April.
    11. Eling, Martin & Jia, Ruo & Schaper, Philipp, 2017. "Get the Balance Right: A Simultaneous Equation Model to Analyze Growth, Profitability, and Safety," Working Papers on Finance 1716, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    12. Yueyun Chen & Iskandar Hamwi & Tim Hudson, 2003. "Capital asset pricing models with default risk: Theory and application in insurance," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 9(1), pages 20-34, February.
    13. Garven, James R. & Louberge, Henri, 1996. "Reinsurance, Taxes, and Efficiency: A Contingent Claims Model of Insurance Market Equilibrium," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 74-93, January.
    14. Kostadinova, Radostina, 2007. "Optimal investment for insurers when the stock price follows an exponential Lévy process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 250-263, September.
    15. Bankovsky, Damien & Sly, Allan, 2009. "Exact conditions for no ruin for the generalised Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(8), pages 2544-2562, August.
    16. Maurer, Raimond H., 2003. "Institutional investors in Germany: Insurance companies and investment funds," CFS Working Paper Series 2003/14, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    17. Yuchao Dong & J'er^ome Spielmann, 2019. "Weak Limits of Random Coefficient Autoregressive Processes and their Application in Ruin Theory," Papers 1907.01828, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    18. Lai, Li-Hua, 2008. "An evaluation of fuzzy transportation underwriting systematic risk," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1231-1237, November.
    19. Ben Ammar, Semir & Eling, Martin & Milidonis, Andreas, 2015. "Asset Pricing of Financial Insitutions: The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns in the Property/Liability Insurance Industry," Working Papers on Finance 1516, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    20. Li, Shuanming & Lu, Yi, 2013. "On the generalized Gerber–Shiu function for surplus processes with interest," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 127-134.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:17:y:1995:i:2:p:101-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.