IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v38y2018i1p201-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing web sites quality: A systematic literature review by text and association rules mining

Author

Listed:
  • Rekik, Rim
  • Kallel, Ilhem
  • Casillas, Jorge
  • Alimi, Adel M.

Abstract

Nowadays society is deeply affected by web content. A web site, regardless of its category, can provide or not for users their needs. To identify its strengths and weaknesses, a process of analyzing and assessing its quality, via some criteria, is necessary. Assessing web sites is considered as a Multiple Criteria Decision Making problem (MCDM), with a massive number of criteria; a reduction phase is needed. This paper presents, firstly a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify the purposes of recent researches from the assessment and determine the affected categories; secondly, it proposes a process of collecting and extracting data (criteria featuring web sites) from a list of studies. Text mining is applied for this SLR to construct a dataset. Then, a method based on Apriori algorithm is assigned and implemented to find association rules between criteria and the category of the web site, and to get a set of frequent criteria. This paper also presents a review on soft computing assessing methods. It aims to help the research community to have a scope in existing research and to derive future developments. The obtained results motivate us to further probe datasets and association rule mining.

Suggested Citation

  • Rekik, Rim & Kallel, Ilhem & Casillas, Jorge & Alimi, Adel M., 2018. "Assessing web sites quality: A systematic literature review by text and association rules mining," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 201-216.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:201-216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401215302875
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fu Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Chih Chieh Chang, 2015. "Evaluating the Enhancement of Corporate Social Responsibility Websites Quality Based on a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 697-724.
    2. Heradio, Rubén & Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Fernández-Amorós, David & Herrera, Manuel & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2013. "A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of Library 2.0 functionalities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 642-654.
    3. Ozmen-Ertekin, Dilruba & Ozbay, Kaan, 2012. "Dynamic data maintenance for quality data, quality research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 282-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sizo, Amanda & Lino, Adriano & Reis, Luis Paulo & Rocha, Álvaro, 2019. "An overview of assessing the quality of peer review reports of scientific articles," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 286-293.
    2. EL Idrissi, Touria & Idri, Ali & Bakkoury, Zohra, 2019. "Systematic map and review of predictive techniques in diabetes self-management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 263-277.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuang-Hua Hu & Wei Jianguo & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2017. "Risk Factor Assessment Improvement for China’s Cloud Computing Auditing Using a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 737-777, May.
    2. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2018. "How Should National Museums Create Competitive Advantage Following Changes in the Global Economic Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.
    5. Yang Yang & Lin Guo & Zhuling Zhong & Mu Zhang, 2018. "Selection of Technological Innovation for Service-Orientated Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Animesh Debnath & Jagannath Roy & Samarjit Kar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2017. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Strategic Project Portfolio Selection of Agro By-Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Yupeng Liu & Yutao Yang & Yue Liu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Improving Sustainable Mobile Health Care Promotion: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Mahtab Forootan Danesh & Mohammad Reza Dahmardeh Ghaleno & Ehsan Alvandi & Sarita Gajbhiye Meshram & Ercan Kahya, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predicting the Impacts of Optimal Residential Development Scenario on Soil Loss Caused by Surface Runoff and Raindrops Using TOPSIS and WetSpa Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3257-3277, August.
    9. Kuang-Hua Hu & Ming-Fu Hsu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Mu-Ziyun Liu, 2021. "Identifying the key factors of subsidiary supervision and management using an innovative hybrid architecture in a big data environment," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:201-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.