IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v30y2010i5p465-469.html

A case analysis of semantic technologies for R&D intermediation information management

Author

Listed:
  • Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo
  • García-Crespo, Ángel
  • Soto-Acosta, Pedro
  • Ruano-Mayoral, Marcos
  • Jiménez-López, Diego

Abstract

It is evident that companies and research centres can find a myriad of instruments to fund their R&D (Research & Development) activities. Due to the dynamics of the information management in these circumstances there is a need for intermediary businesses intervention. Consequently, intermediary companies are thus involved in a complex process that needs to be managed and controlled. Within this scenario an Information Technology (IT) platform, named RDi-Advise, was developed by EgeoIT using semantic technologies to support R&D process decisions. This case analysis describes the development and implementation of the platform including the lessons learned during the activity period.

Suggested Citation

  • Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo & García-Crespo, Ángel & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Ruano-Mayoral, Marcos & Jiménez-López, Diego, 2010. "A case analysis of semantic technologies for R&D intermediation information management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 465-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:30:y:2010:i:5:p:465-469
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401210000861
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liao, Chechen & Palvia, Prashant & Chen, Jain-Liang, 2009. "Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 309-320.
    2. David O'Sullivan & Lawrence Dooley, 2010. "Collaborative Innovation for the Management of Information Technology Resources," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 16-30, January.
    3. Coakes, E.W. & Coakes, J.M. & Rosenberg, D., 2008. "Co-operative work practices and knowledge sharing issues: A comparison of viewpoints," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 12-25.
    4. Busom, Isabel & Fernández-Ribas, Andrea, 2008. "The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 240-257, March.
    5. Peter Scheir & Stefanie N. Lindstaedt & Chiara Ghidini, 2008. "A Network Model Approach to Retrieval in the Semantic Web," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 56-84, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erika Raquel Badillo & Rosina Moreno, 2016. "Are Collaborative Agreements in Innovation Activities Persistent at the Firm Level? Empirical Evidence for the Spanish Case," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(1), pages 71-101, August.
    2. Samer Ali Al-shami & Salem Aldahmani & Massila Kamalrudin & Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammed Al-shami & Mustafa Musa Jaber, 2022. "A Model of Motivational and Technological Factors Influencing Massive Open Online Courses’ Continuous Intention to Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Sara Amoroso & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "Teaming up with Large R&D Investors: Good or Bad for Knowledge Production and Diffusion?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    5. Amoroso, S., 2013. "Heterogeneity of innovative, collaborative, and productive firm-level processes," Other publications TiSEM f5784a49-7053-401d-855d-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Vlasova, Valeriya, 2021. "Industry-science cooperation and public policy instruments utilization in the private sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 519-528.
    7. Francesco Aiello & Paola Cardamone & Valeria Pupo, 2019. "New evidence on the firm-university linkages in Europe. The role of meritocratic management practices," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 813-828, November.
    8. Hyoung Sun Yoo & Chul Lee & Seung-Pyo Jun, 2018. "The Characteristics of SMEs Preferring Cooperative Research and Development Support from the Government: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    9. John Serbe Marfo & Kwadwo Kyeremeh & Pasty Asamoah & Matilda Kokui Owusu-Bio & Afia Frimpomaa Asare Marfo, 2023. "Exploring factors affecting the adoption and continuance usage of drone in healthcare: The role of the environment," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Antonioli,Davide & Marzucchi,Alberto & Montresor,Sandro, 2012. "Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviours. A propensity score matching evaluation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201205, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    11. Mayra Rebolledo & Joel Sandonís, 2012. "The effectiveness of R&D subsidies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 815-825, November.
    12. Niu, Zhipeng & Liu, Wenjia & Yao, Jia & Xiao, Xu & Wu, Jianjun, 2025. "A multidimensional analysis of potential suppliers’ behavioral intentions in shared parking: Insights from SEM, NCA, and fsQCA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Nahida Sultana & S. M. Shafiul Alam & Rifat Parveen Bokhari, 2025. "Exploring cashless technology continuance among SME entrepreneurs: an integrated approach with sustainability mediation and demographic moderation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Heng Xu & Menglu Zhang & Jun Zeng & Huihui Hao & Hao-Chiang Koong Lin & Mengyun Xiao, 2022. "Use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Structural Equation Modeling in Determining the Factors for Continuance Intention of Knowledge Payment Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Daniel Catalá‐Pérez & María de‐Miguel‐Molina, 2021. "Analyzing Territorial and Sectorial Dimensions of Public–Private Partnerships in Science, Technology, and Innovation policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 113-138, January.
    16. Sajad Rezaei & Muslim Amin & Halimin Herjanto, 2024. "Pay-per-click (PPC) advertising and continuous banking service intentions," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 1542-1558, December.
    17. Ekramifard, Ali & Khademi, Navid & Chaiyasarn, Krisada & Zheng, Zuduo, 2024. "Disability-specific factors in paratransit system continuance: Implications for transportation policy and practice in low-income developing countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 173-189.
    18. Claudia Cantabene & Iacopo Grassi, 2020. "R&D cooperation in SMEs: the direct effect and the moderating role of human capital," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(28), pages 3090-3105, June.
    19. Chen, Jin & Heng, Cheng Suang & Tan, Bernard C.Y. & Lin, Zhijie, 2018. "The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 108-120.
    20. Frishammar, Johan & Essén, Anna & Bergström, Frida & Ekman, Tilda, 2023. "Digital health platforms for the elderly? Key adoption and usage barriers and ways to address them," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:30:y:2010:i:5:p:465-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.