IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v17y2023i2s1751157723000202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the domain development through a word status observation model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Tongyang
  • Sun, Ran
  • Fensel, Julia
  • Yu, Andrew
  • Bu, Yi
  • Xu, Jian

Abstract

For the accurate scientific evaluation and advancement of science, it is crucial to understand the development state of a given disciplinary domain. Existing comprehension methodologies concentrate on quantitatively analyzing broad subject trends without considering the underlying complex status attributes of the words that support and enrich these surface-level trends. Through the perspective of the word role, this study deepens the examination of domain development in a more granular way. We use Word2vec to identify the representative semantic neighbors of a domain-specific feature word from literature. Then, a word status observation model is provided that classifies the role of these representative words as tree structures, including young leaves, dead leaves, roots, and trunk-branches, based on changes in their similarity ranking divergence and information entropy. The static word role provides a new insight into detecting the internal detailed organizational composition and maturing status, while the dynamic role shift helps track historical development changes in the domain. Taking attention in psychology as a case by extracting psychology articles from Microsoft Academic Graph, the empirical study illustrates the results of the observation model and yields intriguing findings. First, the static word role positioning shows that a word's status can be obviously different. Different status indicates areas currently keeping the states of thriving, obsolete, becoming firm supportive pillars (precipitating), and irregularly developing within the domain, respectively. Second, during different development periods, most of the words are maintaining the role of irregularly changing or tending towards precipitation. A certain proportion of words are tending towards prosperity, while only a small set of words are deviating from the prosperity state. The growth of attention-related studies as a whole is well-grown and gradually approaching maturity. Our study further supports researchers’ understanding of the domain development status from a more granular perspective of word roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Tongyang & Sun, Ran & Fensel, Julia & Yu, Andrew & Bu, Yi & Xu, Jian, 2023. "Understanding the domain development through a word status observation model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:17:y:2023:i:2:s1751157723000202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2023.101395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157723000202
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qinghua Zhai & Jing Su & Minghai Ye, 2014. "Focus on China: the current status of entrepreneurship research in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1985-2006, March.
    2. Yujia Zhai & Ying Ding & Fang Wang, 2018. "Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: A citation analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(3), pages 368-379, March.
    3. Baitong Chen & Ying Ding & Feicheng Ma, 2018. "Semantic word shifts in a scientific domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 211-226, October.
    4. Chunmei Gan & Weijun Wang, 2015. "Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometric and co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1167-1182, November.
    5. Qian, Yue & Liu, Yu & Sheng, Quan Z., 2020. "Understanding hierarchical structural evolution in a scientific discipline: A case study of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    6. Yaqub, Ohid, 2018. "Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 169-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mao, Jin & Liang, Zhentao & Cao, Yujie & Li, Gang, 2020. "Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: Introducing an approach based on knowledge memes," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    2. Qiang Gao & Xiao Huang & Ke Dong & Zhentao Liang & Jiang Wu, 2022. "Semantic-enhanced topic evolution analysis: a combination of the dynamic topic model and word2vec," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1543-1563, March.
    3. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    4. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    5. Dejing Kong & Jianzhong Yang & Lingfeng Li, 2020. "Early identification of technological convergence in numerical control machine tool: a deep learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1983-2009, December.
    6. Xian Li & Ronald Rousseau & Liming Liang & Fangjie Xi & Yushuang Lü & Yifan Yuan & Xiaojun Hu, 2022. "Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2105-2122, April.
    7. Saddam Hossain & M. Sadik Batcha & Ibrahim Atoum & Naved Ahmad & Afnan Al-Shehri, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Sustainability in the Impact of Social Media on Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Lu Huang & Xiang Chen & Yi Zhang & Changtian Wang & Xiaoli Cao & Jiarun Liu, 2022. "Identification of topic evolution: network analytics with piecewise linear representation and word embedding," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5353-5383, September.
    9. Tang, Xuli & Li, Xin & Ding, Ying & Song, Min & Bu, Yi, 2020. "The pace of artificial intelligence innovations: Speed, talent, and trial-and-error," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    10. Sharma, Anuj & Nunkoo, Robin & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "On the intellectual structure and influence of tourism social science research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Yu, Xiaoyao & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Jia, Tao, 2021. "Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    12. Alessandro Pluchino & Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Andrea Rapisarda, 2018. "Talent Versus Luck: The Role Of Randomness In Success And Failure," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03n04), pages 1-31, May.
    13. Vuong Quan Hoang & La Viet Phuong & Vuong Thu Trang & Hoang Phuong Hanh & Ho Manh Toan & Ho Manh Tung & Nguyen Hong Kong To, 2020. "Multi-faceted insights of entrepreneurship facing a fast-growing economy: A literature review," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 25-41, January.
    14. Aliakbar Pourhatami & Mohammad Kaviyani-Charati & Bahareh Kargar & Hamed Baziyad & Maryam Kargar & Carlos Olmeda-Gómez, 2021. "Mapping the intellectual structure of the coronavirus field (2000–2020): a co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6625-6657, August.
    15. Sung Kim & Derek Hansen & Richard Helps, 2018. "Computing research in the academy: insights from theses and dissertations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 135-158, January.
    16. Nuvolari, Alessandro & Tartari, Valentina & Tranchero, Matteo, 2021. "Patterns of innovation during the Industrial Revolution: A reappraisal using a composite indicator of patent quality," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Wareham, Jonathan & Pujol Priego, Laia & Romasanta, Angelo Kenneth & Mathiassen, Thomas Wareham & Nordberg, Markus & Tello, Pablo Garcia, 2022. "Systematizing serendipity for big science infrastructures: The ATTRACT project," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Lyu, Haihua & Bu, Yi & Zhao, Zhenyue & Zhang, Jiarong & Li, Jiang, 2022. "Citation bias in measuring knowledge flow: Evidence from the web of science at the discipline level," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    19. Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge & Rosa Lidia Vega-Almeida & José Luis Jiménez-Andrade & Humberto Carrillo-Calvet, 2022. "Evolutionary stages and multidisciplinary nature of artificial intelligence research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5139-5158, September.
    20. Ohid Yaqub & Dmitry Malkov & Josh Siepel, 2023. "How unpredictable is research impact? Evidence from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 273-285.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:17:y:2023:i:2:s1751157723000202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.