IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v122y2018i8p885-891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health expenditure data for policy: Health accounts, national accounts or both?

Author

Listed:
  • Mosseveld, Cornelis van
  • Polanen Petel, Vincent van
  • Hernández-Peña, Patricia
  • Verbiest, Piet

Abstract

Compatibility of statistical frameworks and comparability of data are aspects of statistical quality. This paper explores comparability of data from National Accounts (NA) and Care Accounts/health accounts (CA&HA) of the Netherlands. Although based on the same sources, differences result from specificities of each framework, making data adjustments necessary. Data comparison of major aggregates and household spending is a means for verification and for triangulation of sources. Monitoring household spending on health is one of the Sustainable Development Goals. The usability of NA data for household consumption estimates is key to judge plausibility of household spending levels. However, definitions, coverage and valuation in NA and CA&HA should be understood to benefit from the use of NA data for HA. More than in the concepts used the strength of NA is the way NA are usually produced compared with HA. Key is the integrated analysis including supply and demand to verify the comprehensiveness and consistency. It is concluded that SUT data of NA on consumption of human health and social care can be used for judging plausibility of HA household spending estimates, and, in the absence of the latter, NA data can directly be used. The case of the Netherlands shows that policy measures can have a large impact on the validity of using NA for the estimation of household spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Mosseveld, Cornelis van & Polanen Petel, Vincent van & Hernández-Peña, Patricia & Verbiest, Piet, 2018. "Health expenditure data for policy: Health accounts, national accounts or both?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 885-891.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:8:p:885-891
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851018301830
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ravi P. Rannan-Eliya & Luca Lorenzoni, 2010. "Guidelines for Improving the Comparability and Availability of Private Health Expenditures Under the System of Health Accounts Framework," OECD Health Working Papers 52, OECD Publishing.
    2. J Ties Boerma & Colin Mathers & Carla Abou-Zahr, 2010. "WHO and Global Health Monitoring: The Way Forward," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-3, November.
    3. van Mosseveld, Cornelis & Hernández-Peña, Patricia & Arán, Daniel & Cherilova, Veneta & Mataria, Awad, 2016. "How to ensure quality of health accounts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 544-551.
    4. Ana Aizcorbe & Colin Baker & Ernst R. Berndt & David M. Cutler, 2018. "Measuring and Modeling Health Care Costs," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number aizc13-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wren, Maev-Ann & FitzPatrick, Aoife, 2020. "How does Irish healthcare expenditure compare internationally?," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS114, June.
    2. Alkema Leontine & Wong Maria B. & Seah Pei Rong, 2012. "Monitoring Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 4: A Call for Improved Validation of Under-Five Mortality Rate Estimates," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Calcoen, Piet & Moens, Dirk & Verlinden, Pieter & van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M. & Pacolet, Jozef, 2015. "Improved estimates of Belgian private health expenditure can give important lessons to other OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 341-355.
    4. Michael D. Noel, 2022. "Competitive survival in a devastated industry: Evidence from hotels during COVID‐19," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 3-24, February.
    5. Yu Lei & Mark J. Browne, 2020. "Health insurers' operations in the face of health care reform: An analysis of the Supplemental Health Care Exhibit," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(3), pages 277-286, September.
    6. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012. "Impact of Out-of-Pocket Expenditures on Families and Barriers to Use of Maternal and Child Health Services in Asia and the Pacific: Evidence from National Household Surveys of Healthcare Use and Expen," ADB Reports RPT135429-3, Asian Development Bank (ADB), revised 27 Aug 2013.
    7. Laurence C. Baker & M. Kate Bundorf & Anne Beeson Royalty, 2019. "The Effects of Multispecialty Group Practice on Health Care Spending and Use," NBER Working Papers 25915, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Lan My Le & Gabriela Flores & Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer & Toan Khanh Tran & Chuc Thi Kim Nguyen & Do Thanh Tran & Phuc Dang Ho & Isaiah Awintuen Agorinya & Fabrizio Tediosi & Amanda Ross, 2020. "Investigating the effect of recall period on estimates of inpatient out-of-pocket expenditure from household surveys in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Janssen, Aljoscha, 2020. "Switching Costs, Brand Premia and Behavioral Pricing in the Pharmaceutical Market," Working Paper Series 1317, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:122:y:2018:i:8:p:885-891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.