IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v106y2019ic22.html

Public Consciousness and Influence of Law on Forest Crimes: Insights from Kastamonu, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Gençay, Gökçe
  • Mercimek, Anıl

Abstract

This study assessed the forest crimes committed in Kastamonu Regional Directorate of Forestry (KRDF), where forest areas are dense, examined the influences of law and public awareness on changes in crime rates. Nowadays, as the benefits of the forests are gaining importance, efforts to enforce the rule of law in the protection of forests and to raise public awareness on the issue have been increasing. In this study, first the concepts of crime and forest crime were examined, followed by an evaluation of types of forest crimes and the measures taken in in response. Afterwards, a questionnaire study was conducted with people living in the villages affiliated with the KRDF, the sample field, with the purpose of investigating public awareness of forest crimes and penalties, and whether this awareness decreased the crime rates. Using the questionnaire, public awareness of forest crimes and penalties were investigated as well as the reasons that lead to committing such crimes. In addition, the perspective of the society on the forest was also assessed with the help of the questionnaire, in order to reduce the crime rates and to increase the effectiveness of law. If the public was aware of both the forest crimes and penalties sufficiently, the crime rates were often lower in the area because residents obeyed the rules. Therefore, the effectiveness of law is high. This is important in terms of reducing forest crime rates, preserving forest assets, sustainable forestry, and transferring it to future generations. Thus, the legal rules meet these objectives. However, in cases where the crime rate was high even though the public awareness on forest crimes is adequate, the effectiveness of law is low, and other measures shall will have to be adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Gençay, Gökçe & Mercimek, Anıl, 2019. "Public Consciousness and Influence of Law on Forest Crimes: Insights from Kastamonu, Turkey," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:106:y:2019:i:c:22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934118306026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:6011 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tim Friehe & Thomas J. Miceli, 2017. "On Punishment Severity and Crime Rates," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 464-485.
    3. van Heeswijk, Laura & Turnhout, Esther, 2013. "The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 6-13.
    4. Siry, Jacek P. & Cubbage, Frederick W. & Ahmed, Miyan Rukunuddin, 2005. "Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 551-561, May.
    5. World Bank, 2009. "Roots for Good Forest Outcomes : An Analytical Framework for Governance Reforms," World Bank Publications - Reports 3103, The World Bank Group.
    6. Kovandzic, Tomislav V. & Sloan, John J., 2002. "Police levels and crime rates revisited: A county-level analysis from Florida (1980-1998)," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 65-76.
    7. Wiersum, K. Freerk & Elands, Birgit H.M., 2013. "Opinions on legality principles considered in the FLEGT/VPA policy in Ghana and Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 14-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radmir Iksanov & Olga Khalikova & Igor Vladimirov & Ravil Gizzatullin & Regina Baiturina & Vitaliy Kovshov & Aigul Selezneva & Sofya Khasanova, 2021. "Forestry violations as a global issue of legal regulation in the field of forest control and supervision: the Krasnodar territory and the Republic of Bashkortostan case study," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 272-284.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hyowon, 2019. "Accountability and reciprocal interests of bilateral forest cooperation under the global forest regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Brusselaers, Jan & Buysse, Jeroen, 2018. "Implementation of the EU-Cameroon Voluntary Partnership Agreement policy: Trade distortion, rent-seeking and anticipative behavior," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 167-179.
    3. Tegegne, Yitagesu T. & Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta & FOBISSIE, KALAME & Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J. & Lindner, Marcus & Kanninen, Markku, 2017. "Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and REDD+ in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Afriyie, Kwadwo & Abass, Kabila, 2020. "Profiting from illegality: A discursive analysis of the chainsaw operation in rural Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Misuraca, Francesco, 2021. "Civilizzazione e funzione ancillare della forza," SocArXiv k9auc, Center for Open Science.
    7. Yahagi, Ken, 2021. "Law enforcement with motivated agents," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Vollaard, Ben & Koning, Pierre, 2009. "The effect of police on crime, disorder and victim precaution. Evidence from a Dutch victimization survey," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 336-348, December.
    9. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Rastislav Šulek & Ján Lichý & Jaroslav Šálka, 2018. "Understanding Sustainable Forest Management Certification in Slovakia: Forest Owners’ Perception of Expectations, Benefits and Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Angelingis Makatta & Lupala ZJ & Faustin Maganga & Amos Majule, 2018. "Forest Governance at Village Level with Potential for REDD+ in Participatory Forest Management, Tanzania," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 40-51, - January.
    11. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Wang, Quan-Jing & Sun, Yi-Hong, 2022. "The impact of governmental ideology on forest preservation: Evidence from cross-country data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Andong, Sandrine & Ongolo, Symphorien, 2020. "From global forest governance to domestic politics: The European forest policy reforms in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Salvatore Capasso & Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2019. "Is it the gums, teeth or the bite? Effectiveness of dimensions of enforcement in curbing corruption," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 329-369, December.
    15. Wang, Sen & Wilson, Bill, 2007. "Pluralism in the economics of sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 743-750, April.
    16. Ben-Arieh, Asher, 2010. "Public expenditure, locality characteristics and child outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1778-1786, December.
    17. Lee, Donna J. & Adams, Damian C. & Kim, C.S., 2009. "Managing invasive plants on public conservation forestlands: Application of a bio-economic model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 237-243, July.
    18. Leonel Prieto & Arman Canatay & Muhammad R. Amin, 2026. "(Un)Sustainable Development: Do Democracies Outperform Autocracies?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 554-584, February.
    19. Wilkinson, Graham R. & Schofield, Mick & Kanowski, Peter, 2014. "Regulating forestry — Experience with compliance and enforcement over the 25years of Tasmania's forest practices system," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-11.
    20. Mansourian, Stephanie & Sgard, Anne, 2021. "Diverse interpretations of governance and their relevance to forest landscape restoration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:106:y:2019:i:c:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.