IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v92y2026ics154461232502687x.html

Dual-objective autoencoder framework for Taiwan 50 index sparse portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, Chi-Sheng

Abstract

This research develops a dual-objective framework for sparse portfolio construction using autoencoders on the Taiwan 50 (0050 TW) index. Standard (AE) and variational (VAE) autoencoders are augmented with dedicated selection and weight layers that jointly learn stock inclusion and allocation from a shared latent representation. The main objectives are to minimize tracking error (TE) and maximize excess return (ER), subject to enforcing cardinality to select approximately 16 % of the constituents from 0050 TW. Empirical evaluation across rolling out-of-sample windows reveals that AE consistently outperforms VAE in ER across all TE weights and exhibits substantially lower downside risk via VaR and CVaR. Adding Lasso penalties to create AE-L and VAE-L effectively reduces TE and reconstruction error through stronger internal latent sparsity. Comparisons with a non-learning MILP-MAD reveal that autoencoder approaches achieve competitive benchmark tracking while offering better ER, particularly at low TE weights. Overall, compact end-to-end learned portfolios effectively replicate and potentially outperform the benchmark.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, Chi-Sheng, 2026. "Dual-objective autoencoder framework for Taiwan 50 index sparse portfolio," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s154461232502687x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232502687X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:92:y:2026:i:c:s154461232502687x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.