IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-25-00515.html

Can NASDAQ-100 derivatives ETF portfolio beat QQQ?

Author

Listed:
  • Chi-Sheng Lo

    (Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica)

Abstract

Portfolio optimization in derivative ETF markets presents complex challenges in balancing competing objectives across instruments with fundamentally different risk-return profiles. This paper constructs a portfolio strategy to optimize NASDAQ-100 derivative ETF allocations by balancing tracking error minimization relative to the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) with excess return maximization. The approach dynamically allocates investments across three specialized ETFs: a short-position fund (YQQQ), an income-focused covered-call fund (QYLD), and a triple-leveraged fund (TQQQ). Using a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework, the strategy applies anomaly detection to optimize rebalancing timing, incorporating dividend payments to enhance returns. The approach achieves positive excess returns across all evaluation periods, though risk-adjusted performance progressively deteriorates from substantial outperformance during training to underperformance during testing. This progression reveals both the potential and limitations of reinforcement learning approaches for multi-objective portfolio optimization when encountering evolving market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi-Sheng Lo, 2025. "Can NASDAQ-100 derivatives ETF portfolio beat QQQ?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(4), pages 1636-1648.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-25-00515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2025/Volume45/EB-25-V45-I4-P143.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-25-00515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.