IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v58y2023ipbs1544612323008395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of key audit matters reviewing on loan approval decisions?

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Jie
  • Su, Shengqi
  • Liu, Shanmin

Abstract

The existing literature does not provide a definitive statement on whether the inclusion of Key Audit Matters (KAM) in accounting research increases the likelihood of loan approval by bank approvers. This study investigates the combined effects of approvers' trait skepticism, their professional background in accounting and auditing, as well as the familiarity and readability of KAM content, on loan approval probability. The findings indicate that an increased duration spent reading 'How' paragraph enhances the probability of loan approval by approvers. Moreover, this positive correlation is more pronounced for familiar and easily legible content, highly skeptical individuals, and those with expertise in accounting and auditing. These results offer novel insights and research perspectives for KAM while expanding upon the literature concerning factors influencing approvers' loan approvals.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Jie & Su, Shengqi & Liu, Shanmin, 2023. "The effect of key audit matters reviewing on loan approval decisions?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pb:s1544612323008395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612323008395
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pb:s1544612323008395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.