IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v68y2018icp108-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inside the black box: Modeling “Life Writing” for lifelong health and well being

Author

Listed:
  • Sabir, Myra
  • Johnson, Margaret A.

Abstract

We articulate the lifespan theory of change by which an attachment-focused integrative reminiscence intervention, “Life Writing”, is expected to interrupt the continuing problem of insecure attachment in adults and reverse associated reduced health and well-being outcomes. Based on preliminary studies and previous research, Life Writing is expected to foster earned-secure attachment in adults who work through subjective memories of unresolved attachment trauma. Roughly two decades of research on integrative reminiscence interventions like Life Writing show their consistent and wide-ranging positive impact. However, the bulk of this research demonstrates that such programs work, without also clarifying how they work, leaving unanswered questions as to how change occurs and how benefits might continue to accrue to participants through the lifespan. This represents what are known as “black box” effects. A program and evaluation planning tool, The Netway, was used to 1) identify hypothesized links between program inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and long-term impacts; 2) to clarify the underlying assumptions related to the program’s success; and 3) to consider the appropriate contexts for the program. The logic model presented here articulates the hypothesized causal pathway from insecure to earned-secure attachment, in preparation for rigorous empirical tests of the program’s lifespan theory of change.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabir, Myra & Johnson, Margaret A., 2018. "Inside the black box: Modeling “Life Writing” for lifelong health and well being," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 108-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:108-116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718917301817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian, David A., 1997. "The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 251-257, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian, David A. & Clapp, John, 2000. "Planning, investment and evaluation procedures to support coordination and outcomes based funding in a local United Way system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 231-240, May.
    2. William Brown, 2017. "Classification of Program Activities: How Nonprofits Create Social Value," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Li-Ju Lin & Yu-Chang Hsu & Andrew E. Scharlach & Hsien-Wen Kuo, 2019. "Examining Stakeholder Perspectives: Process, Performance and Progress of the Age-Friendly Taiwan Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Kates, Jennifer & Marconi, Katherine & Mannle, Thomas E., 2001. "Developing a performance management system for a Federal public health program: the Ryan White CARE ACT Titles I and II," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 145-155, May.
    5. Lenihan, Helena, 2011. "Enterprise policy evaluation: Is there a 'new' way of doing it?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 323-332, November.
    6. Nesman, Teresa M. & Batsche, Catherine & Hernandez, Mario, 2007. "Theory-based evaluation of a comprehensive Latino education initiative: An interactive evaluation approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 267-281, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:108-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.