IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v50y2015icp88-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who's who in the crew? Exploring participant involvement in the Active Living Coalition

Author

Listed:
  • Barnes, Priscilla A.
  • Schaefer, Samantha
  • Middlestadt, Susan
  • Knoblock, Heidi

Abstract

Health coalitions serve as an important “vehicle” to strengthen horizontal and vertical ties between organizations, community groups, and individuals whose intent and purpose is to improve wellness. Having a strong and diverse group of participants is essential for highly effective coalitions to carry out their mission in an organized and participatory manner. However, the extent that individuals become involved in coalition operations and activities remains ambiguous. A grounded theory approach was used to explore expressions of participant involvement of a local health coalition known as the Active Living Coalition (ALC). Open, axial, as well as domain and taxonomic coding were used to analyze transcripts from four focus groups (n=37 participants) in order to develop a participant continuum that captured six network aggregates within the coalition. Findings suggest that participation, for the most part, was heterogeneous and ever-changing given the expectations of the level of partnership that best individuals’ personal and professional interests. Differentiating the type of participants in health coalitions can help coalition leaders more successfully “manage” new and existing relationships. Findings imply that health coalitions can maximize coalition capacity by drawing upon the full range of potential human and material resources by further understanding the types of individuals that make up their network.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnes, Priscilla A. & Schaefer, Samantha & Middlestadt, Susan & Knoblock, Heidi, 2015. "Who's who in the crew? Exploring participant involvement in the Active Living Coalition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 88-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:88-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914001281
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hays, C. E. & Hays, S. P. & DeVille, J. O. & Mulhall, P. F., 2000. "Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 373-379, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valente, Thomas W. & Coronges, Kathryn A. & Stevens, Gregory D. & Cousineau, Michael R., 2008. "Collaboration and competition in a children's health initiative coalition: A network analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 392-402, November.
    2. Reinert, Bonita & Carver, Vivien & Range, Lillian M., 2005. "Evaluating community tobacco use prevention coalitions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 201-208, May.
    3. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    4. Jeroen J. L. Candel, 2022. "Power to the people? Food democracy initiatives’ contributions to democratic goods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1477-1489, December.
    5. Merrill, Marina L. & Taylor, Nicole L. & Martin, Alison J. & Maxim, Lauren A. & D’Ambrosio, Ryan & Gabriel, Roy M. & Wendt, Staci J. & Mannix, Danyelle & Wells, Michael E., 2012. "A mixed-method exploration of functioning in Safe Schools/Healthy Students partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 280-286.
    6. Walid El Ansari & Reza Oskrochi & Ceri Phillips, 2009. "Engagement and Action for Health: The Contribution of Leaders’ Collaborative Skills to Partnership Success," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Jasuja, Guneet Kaur & Chou, Chih-Ping & Bernstein, Karen & Wang, Eric & McClure, Maykami & Pentz, Mary Ann, 2005. "Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 173-184, May.
    8. Silverman, Basha & Champney, Joanna & Steber, Sara-Ann & Zubritsky, Cynthia, 2015. "Collaborating for consensus: Considerations for convening Coalition stakeholders to promote a gender-based approach to addressing the health needs of sex workers," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-26.
    9. Boutilier, Robert G. & Black, Leeora, 2013. "Legitimizing industry and multi-sectoral regulation of cumulative impacts: A comparison of mining and energy development in Athabasca, Canada and the Hunter Valley, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 696-703.
    10. Rog, Debra & Boback, Nicole & Barton-Villagrana, Heather & Marrone-Bennett, Patricia & Cardwell, John & Hawdon, James & Diaz, Jessica & Jenkins, Pamela & Kridler, Jamie & Reischl, Thomas, 2004. "Sustaining collaboratives: a cross-site analysis of The National Funding Collaborative on Violence Prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 249-261, August.
    11. King, Gillian & Servais, Michelle & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline & Currie, Melissa & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Forchuk, Cheryl & Chalmers, Heather & Willoughby, Teena, 2009. "A measure of community members' perceptions of the impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 289-299, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:88-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.