IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v50y2015icp26-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The opportunities and challenges of multi-site evaluations: Lessons from the jail diversion and trauma recovery national cross-site evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Stainbrook, Kristin
  • Penney, Darby
  • Elwyn, Laura

Abstract

Multi-site evaluations, particularly of federally funded service programs, pose a special set of challenges for program evaluation. Not only are there contextual differences related to project location, there are often relatively few programmatic requirements, which results in variations in program models, target populations and services. The Jail Diversion and Trauma Recovery–Priority to Veterans (JDTR) National Cross-Site Evaluation was tasked with conducting a multi-site evaluation of thirteen grantee programs that varied along multiple domains. This article describes the use of a mixed methods evaluation design to understand the jail diversion programs and client outcomes for veterans with trauma, mental health and/or substance use problems. We discuss the challenges encountered in evaluating diverse programs, the benefits of the evaluation in the face of these challenges, and offer lessons learned for other evaluators undertaking this type of evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stainbrook, Kristin & Penney, Darby & Elwyn, Laura, 2015. "The opportunities and challenges of multi-site evaluations: Lessons from the jail diversion and trauma recovery national cross-site evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 26-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:26-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718915000075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeMatteo, David & LaDuke, Casey & Locklair, Benjamin R. & Heilbrun, Kirk, 2013. "Community-based alternatives for justice-involved individuals with severe mental illness: Diversion, problem-solving courts, and reentry," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 64-71.
    2. Steadman, H.J. & Morris, S.M. & Dennis, D.L., 1995. "The diversion of mentally ill persons from jails to community-based services: A profile of programs," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(12), pages 1630-1635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolff, Lisa S. & Errichetti, Karen Sautter & Tapia Walker, Stephanie & Davis, Mary V. & Brodesky, Michelle Kuhns, 2020. "Striking a Balance between Program-Specific and Portfolio-Level Evaluation: Lessons Learned from a Multi-Site Evaluation on the Texas-Mexico Border," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cowell, Alexander J. & Hinde, Jesse M. & Broner, Nahama & Aldridge, Arnie P., 2015. "The cost of implementing a jail diversion program for people with mental illness in San Antonio, Texas," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 57-62.
    2. Carolyn Dewa & Lucy Trojanowski & Chiachen Cheng & Frank Sirotich, 2012. "Lessons from a Canadian province: examining collaborations between the mental health and justice sectors," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(1), pages 7-14, February.
    3. Lo Sasso, Anthony T. & Byro, Erik & Jason, Leonard A. & Ferrari, Joseph R. & Olson, Bradley, 2012. "Benefits and costs associated with mutual-help community-based recovery homes: The Oxford House model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 47-53.
    4. Cowell, Alexander J. & Hinde, Jesse M. & Broner, Nahama & Aldridge, Arnie P., 2013. "The impact on taxpayer costs of a jail diversion program for people with serious mental illness," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 31-37.
    5. Christine M. Sarteschi, 2013. "Mentally Ill Offenders Involved With the U.S. Criminal Justice System," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    6. Julian M Somers & Akm Moniruzzaman & Stefanie N Rezansoff & Michelle Patterson, 2014. "Examining the Impact of Case Management in Vancouver’s Downtown Community Court: A Quasi-Experimental Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-8, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:50:y:2015:i:c:p:26-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.