IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v35y2012i1p54-65.html

Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Celik, Halime
  • Abma, Tineke A.
  • Klinge, Ineke
  • Widdershoven, Guy A.M.

Abstract

Patients’ health and health needs are influenced by categories of difference like sex, gender, ethnic origin and socioeconomic status (SES). To enhance awareness of this diversity among patients and to provide holistic care for them, health professionals should first be aware of the relation between dimensions of diversity and patients’ health and health demands. This paper presents a formative process evaluation of a diversity sensitivity training programme for healthcare professionals. The training was implemented in three healthcare settings (mental healthcare, nursing home and hospital care). Mixed methods were used to monitor the implementation of the training and its effects after three years. Findings demonstrate that the training stimulated participants’ awareness, knowledge and critical attitudes towards diversity. Their motivation and willingness to take action regarding diversity was also enhanced. Yet these developments were less apparent among nursing home participants who felt less satisfied and did not develop a critical perspective on this issue. Qualitative data were helpful to explain differences between the settings. By means of the combination of quantitative and qualitative data, we can conclude that individual learning was not enough to guarantee a sensitive approach to diversity at the organizational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Celik, Halime & Abma, Tineke A. & Klinge, Ineke & Widdershoven, Guy A.M., 2012. "Process evaluation of a diversity training program: The value of a mixed method strategy," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 54-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:54-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718911000668
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bird, Chloe E. & Rieker, Patricia P., 1999. "Gender matters: an integrated model for understanding men's and women's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 745-755, March.
    2. Mead, Nicola & Bower, Peter, 2000. "Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1087-1110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pelucha, Martin & Kveton, Viktor & Potluka, Oto, 2019. "Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 146-155.
    2. Moriña, Anabel & Carballo, Rafael, 2017. "The impact of a faculty training program on inclusive education and disability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 77-83.
    3. Appannah, Arti & Meyer, Claudia & Ogrin, Rajna & McMillan, Sally & Barrett, Elizabeth & Browning, Colette, 2017. "Diversity training for the community aged care workers: A conceptual framework for evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 74-81.
    4. Abraham, Traci H. & Deen, Tisha L. & Hamilton, Michelle & True, Gala & O’Neil, Marie T. & Blanchard, Jessica & Uddo, Madeline, 2020. "Analyzing free-text survey responses: An accessible strategy for developing patient-centered programs and program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Devin Naidoo & Andrea Echarri-Gonzalez & Sarah Levitt & Alexander Mass & Eric Smith & Daryle Lamonica & Julianne Hall, 2023. "Evaluation of a Multipart Implicit Bias Educational Program Designed for a Non-Profit Organization," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Jennifer & Rosenthal, Lisa & Auerbach, Melissa V. & Kocis, Christina & Busso, Cheyanne & Lobel, Marci, 2017. "Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 133-140.
    2. Josephson, Iréne & Woodward-Kron, Robyn & Delany, Clare & Hiller, Amy, 2015. "Evaluative language in physiotherapy practice: How does it contribute to the therapeutic relationship?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 128-136.
    3. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    4. Rathert, Cheryl & Mittler, Jessica N. & Vogus, Timothy J. & Lee, Yuna S.H., 2023. "Better outcomes through patient – Provider therapeutic connections? An exploratory study of proposed mediating variables," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    5. France Légaré & Annette M. O'Connor & Ian D. Graham & Georges A. Wells & Stéphane Tremblay, 2006. "Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(4), pages 373-390, July.
    6. Read, Jen'nan Ghazal & Gorman, Bridget K., 2006. "Gender inequalities in US adult health: The interplay of race and ethnicity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 1045-1065, March.
    7. Mitchell, Ellen M.H. & Kwizera, Amata & Usta, Momade & Gebreselassie, Hailemichael, 2010. "Choosing early pregnancy termination methods in Urban Mozambique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 62-70, July.
    8. Sutantri Sutantri & Fiona Cuthill & Aisha Holloway, 2020. "“I just can't sit around and do nothing!”: A qualitative study of Indonesian women's experiences diagnosed with heart disease," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1047-1055, December.
    9. Capodici, Angelo & Pirni, Alberto & Gadignani, Anna & Noci, Francesca & Giardelli, Lucia & Emdin, Michele & Giannoni, Alberto, 2025. "Humanizing Telemedicine through Recognition-Based Ethics," SocArXiv 8w9xk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Diamond-Brown, Lauren, 2018. "“It can be challenging, it can be scary, it can be gratifying”: Obstetricians’ narratives of negotiating patient choice, clinical experience, and standards of care in decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 48-54.
    11. Johnson, Blair T. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L., 2018. "What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 218-226.
    12. Manzer, Jamie L. & Bell, Ann V., 2022. "The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0214200 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. May, Carl & Rapley, Tim & Moreira, Tiago & Finch, Tracy & Heaven, Ben, 2006. "Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 1022-1030, February.
    15. Dona Ghosh & Jaydeep Sengupta & Aviral Kumar Tiwari, 2020. "Revisiting the Role of Gender in Health Taxonomy: Evidence from the Elderly in India," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 24(2), pages 104-133, June.
    16. Vredenburg, Jessica & Bell, Simon J., 2014. "Variability in health care services: the role of service employee flexibility," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 168-178.
    17. Ishikawa, Hirono & Hashimoto, Hideki & Kiuchi, Takahiro, 2013. "The evolving concept of “patient-centeredness” in patient–physician communication research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-153.
    18. Nor Azmaniza Azizam & Siti Noorsuriani Maon & Leny Suzana & Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Factors Influencing Selected Health Outcome among Patients Attending Universiti Teknologi MARA Medical Centre," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 500-511, July.
    19. Fausto-Sterling, Anne & Coll, Cynthia Garcia & Lamarre, Meghan, 2012. "Sexing the baby: Part 1 – What do we really know about sex differentiation in the first three years of life?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(11), pages 1684-1692.
    20. Nicole Brown, 2021. "The Social Course of Fibromyalgia: Resisting Processes of Marginalisation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Clough, Sharyn, 2011. "Gender and the hygiene hypothesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 486-493, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.