IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v18y1995i4p321-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the effectiveness of evaluations: Making the link to organizational theory

Author

Listed:
  • Rogers, Patricia J.
  • Hough, Gary

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogers, Patricia J. & Hough, Gary, 1995. "Improving the effectiveness of evaluations: Making the link to organizational theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 321-332.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:4:p:321-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(95)00033-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McLemore, Jacqueline R. & Neumann, Jean E., 1987. "The inherently political nature of program evaluators and evaluation research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 83-93, January.
    2. Sonnichsen, Richard C., 1989. "Methodology: A bridge or barrier between evaluators and managers?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 287-290, January.
    3. William H. Starbuck, 1982. "Congealing Oil: Inventing Ideologies To Justify Acting Ideologies Out," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 3-27, January.
    4. Palumbo, Dennis J. & Hallett, Michael A., 1993. "Conflict versus consensus models in policy evaluation and implementation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23.
    5. Iutcovich, Joyce Miller & Iutcovich, Mark, 1987. "The politics of evaluation research : A case study of community development block grant funding for human services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 71-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hallensleben, Tobias & Jain, Anil K., 2012. ""Wir müssen hier sehr schnell konstruieren": Diskurs und Institutionelle Reflexivität," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2012, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Dierkes, Meinolf, 1988. "Unternehmenskultur und Unternehmensführung: konzeptionelle Ansätze und gesicherte Erkenntnisse," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(5/6), pages 554-575.
    3. Kosheleva, S.V. & Zavyalova, E.K. & Tsybova, V.S. & Kucherov, D.G. & Alsufyev, A.I., 2014. "Managing innovation in Russian competitive companies:The role of HRM," Working Papers 6388, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    4. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Monika Winn, 2012. "Extreme Weather Events and the Critical Importance of Anticipatory Adaptation and Organizational Resilience in Responding to Impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 17-32, January.
    5. Alan D. Meyer & Vibha Gaba & Kenneth A. Colwell, 2005. "Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 456-473, October.
    6. Moyo, Laurane & Wehn, Uta, 2017. "Interaction dynamics: The case of the water sector skills plan in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 91-99.
    7. Mazur Karolina, 2019. "Symbolic action and organizational resources acquisition and exploitation," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 32-48, December.
    8. Xixi Li & J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai, 2013. "Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 659-682, September.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4638 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Juha-Antti Lamberg & Jukka Luoma, 2021. "Ideology in Vicarious Learning–Related Communication," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 708-730, May.
    11. F J Burdett & M G Bradford, 1988. "An Organisational Approach to Analysis of Policy Innovation by Local Authorities in Britain: The Importance of the Concepts of Scrutiny, Conflict, and Centralisation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 6(2), pages 159-172, June.
    12. Philippe Baumard, 1998. "Starbuck, William Haynes (1934 –)," Post-Print hal-03230911, HAL.
    13. Nichols, Laura, 2002. "Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Goran Vlašić & Josef Langer, 2012. "Concept of reputation: different perspectives and robust empirical understandings," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 24(2), pages 219-244.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:4:p:321-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.