IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v114y2026ics014971892500182x.html

Impacting the substance abuse epidemic in America: A mixed methods examination of mentors of youth who experience substance use disorders within their families

Author

Listed:
  • Phillippi, Stephen
  • Fenton, Ashley
  • Witmeier, Kelsey
  • Juneau, Sara
  • Leonardi, Claudia
  • Bowers, Edmond P.
  • Maus, Brian

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the experiences and needs of mentors in Camp Mariposa; a program designed to prevent substance use among youth who have a family member with a substance use disorder (SUD). Using a mixed-methods design, the study included a quantitative survey and focus groups. Of 280 eligible mentors, 116 (41 %) completed the survey, with 24 (21 %) participating in follow-up focus groups. Descriptive statistics illustrate survey data findings, and qualitative findings reflect themes that emerged from focus groups. Mentors reported positive experiences working with peers and youth but also highlighted challenges that could inform future mentoring efforts. Key factors influencing their experiences included the benefits and challenges of mentoring, program leadership, self-care needs, and strategies during camp weekends. Mentors expressed a desire for more training and emphasized the importance of pre-camp briefings and post-camp debriefings. Confidence in mentoring abilities and maintaining empathy and boundaries were also highlighted. This study provides valuable insights for improving mentor support and training in programs targeting youth facing adversities that come with having a family member with a SUD.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillippi, Stephen & Fenton, Ashley & Witmeier, Kelsey & Juneau, Sara & Leonardi, Claudia & Bowers, Edmond P. & Maus, Brian, 2026. "Impacting the substance abuse epidemic in America: A mixed methods examination of mentors of youth who experience substance use disorders within their families," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s014971892500182x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500182X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102715?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s014971892500182x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.