IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics014971892500031x.html

Refining nascent interventions through emergent design evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Boczar, Dylan
  • Montrosse-Moorhead, Bianca
  • Davidesco, Ido

Abstract

Evaluating nascent educational interventions requires a specific kind of evaluation theory. This paper provides a case example of the emergent design evaluation approach, one theory created for use with developing interventions, but that has limited examples within published literature for practitioners to learn from. The emergent design evaluation theory was used to evaluate the design and implementation of a high school biology unit integrating computational thinking and neural engineering, including teacher professional development and a web-based application. A contribution of this paper, beyond the case example it provides, is that the emergent design evaluation was combined with design-based research, a complementary approach. Consistent with the practices uniquely characteristic of emergent design evaluation, this paper describes critical points or key occasions in which aspects of the intervention influence the evaluation process, or vice versa, including the nature and direction of influence. By demonstrating the process of combining emergent design evaluation and design-based research, this paper adds to discussions within the field about how to intentionally weave together different knowledge generation approaches that both meet evaluation demands and align with the evaluation context.

Suggested Citation

  • Boczar, Dylan & Montrosse-Moorhead, Bianca & Davidesco, Ido, 2025. "Refining nascent interventions through emergent design evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500031x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500031X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Lyke & Herman, Sandra, 1996. "Emergent design: Understanding and evolving measures of a family support system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 235-252, August.
    2. Mark, Melvin M., 2023. "Doing better in theory-based evaluation, from A to Z," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Christie, Christina A. & Montrosse, Bianca E. & Klein, Brock M., 2005. "Emergent design evaluation: A case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 271-277, August.
    4. O'Connor, Mary Katherine & Netting, F. Ellen, 2008. "Faith-based evaluation: Accountable to whom, for what?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 347-355, November.
    5. Connors, Susan C. & Magilvy, Joan K., 2011. "Assessing vital signs: Applying two participatory evaluation frameworks to the evaluation of a college of nursing," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 79-86, May.
    6. Tremblay, Melissa & Gokiert, Rebecca & Kingsley, Bethan & Mottershead, Karen & Pei, Jacqueline, 2020. "Using developmental evaluation and community-based participatory research to develop a model of supportive housing," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre-Marc Daigneault & Steve Jacob & Joël Tremblay, 2012. "Measuring Stakeholder Participation in Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(4), pages 243-271, August.
    2. O'Connor, Mary Katherine & Netting, F. Ellen, 2008. "Faith-based evaluation: Accountable to whom, for what?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 347-355, November.
    3. Christie, Christina A. & Montrosse, Bianca E. & Klein, Brock M., 2005. "Emergent design evaluation: A case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 271-277, August.
    4. Anzoise, Valentina & Sardo, Stefania, 2016. "Dynamic systems and the role of evaluation: The case of the Green Communities project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 162-172.
    5. Tremblay, Melissa & Kingsley, Bethan & Gokiert, Rebecca & Mottershead, Karen & Pynoo, Emily & Blair, Chantelle & Puinean, Giulia & Blums, Tamarya, 2024. "Staff perspectives on the successful families program model: Combining supportive housing with wraparound services for teen families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Janzen, Rich & Ochocka, Joanna & Turner, Leanne & Cook, Tabitha & Franklin, Michelle & Deichert, Debbie, 2017. "Building a community-based culture of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 163-170.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500031x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.