IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v93y2015ip1p1230-1238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating fractures in rocks from geothermal reservoirs using resistivity at different frequencies

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Kewen
  • Pan, Baozhi
  • Horne, Roland

Abstract

One of the key issues to a successful EGS (Enhanced or engineered Geothermal System) is the creation of a great density of fractures. The detection and characterization of the created fractures is crucial in evaluating the geothermal energy resources in such EGS projects as well as in reservoirs for CO2 sequestration and storage. Methods to evaluate the fractures after stimulations are few, and limited in application. To this end, an approach to detecting and evaluating the fractures using resistivity data measured at different frequencies was developed in this study. The effects of fractures on resistivity measurements at different frequencies have been investigated as a function of water saturation in rocks with different porosity, permeability and lithology. Different rocks (Berea sandstone, and greywacke from The Geysers geothermal reservoir) were used in this study. The permeability of the samples ranged from 0.5 to over 1000 md for the matrix. The frequency ranged from 100 to 100,000 Hz. It was found that the effect of frequency on resistivity is different in rocks with and without fractures, especially in the range of low water saturation. The validity of the Archie equation depends on the existence of fractures, the frequency, and the range of water saturation. The relationship between resistivity and water saturation did not follow the Archie equation at low water saturation in some rocks with fractures. Models for characterizing different types of rocks with specific fracture patterns have been established using the resistivity data measured at different frequencies and different water saturations.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Kewen & Pan, Baozhi & Horne, Roland, 2015. "Evaluating fractures in rocks from geothermal reservoirs using resistivity at different frequencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1230-1238.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:93:y:2015:i:p1:p:1230-1238
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215012943
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Fangming & Chen, Jiliang & Huang, Wenbo & Luo, Liang, 2014. "A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 300-310.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu, Biao & Zhu, Runjun & Zhang, Shaohe & Dick, Jeffrey, 2019. "A qualitative prediction method of new crack-initiation direction during hydraulic fracturing of pre-cracks based on hyperbolic failure envelope," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 185-195.
    2. Cai, Jianchao & Zhang, Zhien & Wei, Wei & Guo, Dongming & Li, Shuai & Zhao, Peiqiang, 2019. "The critical factors for permeability-formation factor relation in reservoir rocks: Pore-throat ratio, tortuosity and connectivity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Shen, Zhonghou & Wang, Gaosheng & Li, Xiaojiang & Zheng, Rui & Geng, Lidong & Li, Jiacheng & Zhang, Shikun, 2018. "Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of a CO2 enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 38-51.
    2. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. He, Renhui & Rong, Guan & Tan, Jie & Phoon, Kok-Kwang & Quan, Junsong, 2022. "Numerical evaluation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system considering rough-walled fractures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 524-544.
    4. Chen, Tairu & Liu, Gang & Liao, Shengming, 2019. "Impacts of boundary conditions on reservoir numerical simulation and performance prediction of enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-213.
    5. Torabi, Mohsen & Zhang, Kaili & Yang, Guangcheng & Wang, Jun & Wu, Peng, 2015. "Heat transfer and entropy generation analyses in a channel partially filled with porous media using local thermal non-equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 922-938.
    6. Han, Songcai & Cheng, Yuanfang & Gao, Qi & Yan, Chuanliang & Zhang, Jincheng, 2020. "Numerical study on heat extraction performance of multistage fracturing Enhanced Geothermal System," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1214-1226.
    7. Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei & Wang, Huidong & Li, Tuo & Wang, Yang & Sun, Zizheng, 2020. "Optimizing heat mining strategies in a fractured geothermal reservoir considering fracture deformation effects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 326-337.
    8. Chen, Jiliang & Jiang, Fangming, 2015. "Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 37-48.
    9. Cheng, Wen-Long & Wang, Chang-Long & Nian, Yong-Le & Han, Bing-Bing & Liu, Jian, 2016. "Analysis of influencing factors of heat extraction from enhanced geothermal systems considering water losses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 274-288.
    10. Xiang Gao & Tailu Li & Yao Zhang & Xiangfei Kong & Nan Meng, 2022. "A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Jinshou Zhu & Zhenpeng Cui & Bo Feng & Hao Ren & Xin Liu, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Geothermal Reservoir Reconstruction and Heat Extraction System Productivity Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Wang, Yang & Li, Tuo & Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei, 2019. "Numerical analysis of heat mining and geological carbon sequestration in supercritical CO2 circulating enhanced geothermal systems inlayed with complex discrete fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 92-108.
    13. Ding, Junfeng & Wang, Shimin, 2018. "2D modeling of well array operating enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 918-932.
    14. Xin-Yue Duan & Di Huang & Wen-Xian Lei & Shi-Chao Chen & Zhao-Qin Huang & Chuan-Yong Zhu, 2023. "Investigation of Heat Extraction in an Enhanced Geothermal System Embedded with Fracture Networks Using the Thermal–Hydraulic–Mechanical Coupling Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Huang, Wenbo & Cao, Wenjiong & Jiang, Fangming, 2018. "A novel single-well geothermal system for hot dry rock geothermal energy exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 630-644.
    17. Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng & Yang, Ruiyue & Wang, Gaosheng & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng & Lyu, Zehao, 2018. "Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 325-337.
    18. Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Lu, Xinli & Huang, Xiaoxue & Liu, Ketao & Wu, Xiujie, 2015. "A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 466-483.
    19. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2018. "Siting enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): Heat benefits versus induced seismicity risks from an investor and societal perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1311-1325.
    20. Guo, Tiankui & Zhang, Yuelong & He, Jiayuan & Gong, Facheng & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in North China oilfield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:93:y:2015:i:p1:p:1230-1238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.