IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v323y2025ics0360544225014550.html

Comprehensive uncertainty quantification for renewable penetrated power system dynamics considering different timescale characterizations of uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhaoyuan
  • Bu, Siqi
  • Zhong, Qi
  • Hung, Chun Kit
  • Chung, Chi Yung

Abstract

Regarding uncertainty quantification (UQ) for renewable penetrated power system (RPPS) dynamics, most studies exclusively focus on the randomness of steady-state operating points (defined as slow timescale characterizations of uncertainties (STCUs)). The rest are only concerned about fast time-varying properties of disturbances (defined as fast timescale characterizations of uncertainties (FTCUs)). However, RPPS dynamics are affected by both of them, only modeling uncertainties with one of them is inaccurate or inefficient, and methods capable of addressing them together are lacking. Thus, this paper proposes an efficient UQ framework to assess RPPS dynamics considering STCUs and FTCUs simultaneously and to provide comprehensive UQ outcomes from different aspects. Firstly, FTCUs are approximated by the superposition of finite STCUs through Karhunen-Loève expansion (KLE) to make them suitable for the proposed uncertainty propagation analysis (UPA) method. Then, UPA is accurately and efficiently conducted based on the proposed statistic-constrained sparse and arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is conducted based on the proposed method to study the impact of STCUs and FTCUs on RPPS stability. Comparisons are performed with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), Sobol quasi-MCS (SQ), and KLE-sparse polynomial chaos expansion (SPCE) on modified IEEE 39-bus system and 240-bus WECC system with different uncertainty quantities. Results show that the proposed method significantly improves efficiency compared to MCS and possesses higher accuracy compared to SQ and KLE-SPCE. And both STCUs and FTCUs may have relevant high sensitivity results associated with RPPS stability indices, demonstrating the necessity of considering STCUs and FTCUs together in evaluating RPPS dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhaoyuan & Bu, Siqi & Zhong, Qi & Hung, Chun Kit & Chung, Chi Yung, 2025. "Comprehensive uncertainty quantification for renewable penetrated power system dynamics considering different timescale characterizations of uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:323:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225014550
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225014550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aien, Morteza & Hajebrahimi, Ali & Fotuhi-Firuzabad, Mahmud, 2016. "A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1077-1089.
    2. Ehsan, Ali & Yang, Qiang, 2019. "State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1509-1523.
    3. Wen, Jiaxin & Bu, Siqi & Li, Fangxing & Du, Pengwei, 2021. "Risk assessment and mitigation on area-level RoCoF for operational planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Hasan, Kazi Nazmul & Preece, Robin & Milanović, Jovica V., 2019. "Existing approaches and trends in uncertainty modelling and probabilistic stability analysis of power systems with renewable generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 168-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Yunyang & Pu, Yang & Yu, Mengmeng & Li, Yi-Chang & Jiang, Min & Cui, Lijie & Xiong, Xiaoqin & Jin, Zhong, 2025. "A dual carbon reward mechanism for electric vehicle charging scheduling based on multi-level Stackelberg game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G., Varathan & J., Belwin Edward, 2024. "A review of uncertainty management approaches for active distribution system planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Yao, Hongmin & Qin, Wenping & Jing, Xiang & Zhu, Zhilong & Wang, Ke & Han, Xiaoqing & Wang, Peng, 2022. "Possibilistic evaluation of photovoltaic hosting capacity on distribution networks under uncertain environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    3. Pepiciello, Antonio & Domínguez-García, José Luis, 2024. "Small-signal stability analysis of uncertain power systems: A comprehensive survey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Lu, M.L. & Sun, Y.J. & Kokogiannakis, G. & Ma, Z.J., 2024. "Design of flexible energy systems for nearly/net zero energy buildings under uncertainty characteristics: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Rahim, Sahar & Wang, Zhen & Ju, Ping, 2022. "Overview and applications of Robust optimization in the avant-garde energy grid infrastructure: A systematic review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    6. Kharrazi, A. & Sreeram, V. & Mishra, Y., 2020. "Assessment techniques of the impact of grid-tied rooftop photovoltaic generation on the power quality of low voltage distribution network - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Jie Zhu & Buxiang Zhou & Yiwei Qiu & Tianlei Zang & Yi Zhou & Shi Chen & Ningyi Dai & Huan Luo, 2023. "Survey on Modeling of Temporally and Spatially Interdependent Uncertainties in Renewable Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Tiago P. Abud & Andre A. Augusto & Marcio Z. Fortes & Renan S. Maciel & Bruno S. M. C. Borba, 2022. "State of the Art Monte Carlo Method Applied to Power System Analysis with Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Kumar, Alok & Singh, Abhishek & Maulik, Avirup & Chinmaya, K.A., 2025. "Multi-market participation of electricity–hydrogen DC microgrid with correlated uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    10. Sun, Qie & Fu, Yu & Lin, Haiyang & Wennersten, Ronald, 2022. "A novel integrated stochastic programming-information gap decision theory (IGDT) approach for optimization of integrated energy systems (IESs) with multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    11. Grover-Silva, Etta & Heleno, Miguel & Mashayekh, Salman & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, George, 2018. "A stochastic optimal power flow for scheduling flexible resources in microgrids operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 201-208.
    12. Nasreddine Belbachir & Mohamed Zellagui & Samir Settoul & Claude Ziad El-Bayeh & Ragab A. El-Sehiemy, 2023. "Multi Dimension-Based Optimal Allocation of Uncertain Renewable Distributed Generation Outputs with Seasonal Source-Load Power Uncertainties in Electrical Distribution Network Using Marine Predator Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Moradi, Amir & Salehi, Javad & Shafie-khah, Miadreza, 2024. "An interactive framework for strategic participation of a price-maker energy hub in the local gas and power markets based on the MPEC method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    14. Gianluca Fulli & Marcelo Masera & Catalin Felix Covrig & Francesco Profumo & Ettore Bompard & Tao Huang, 2017. "The EU Electricity Security Decision-Analytic Framework: Status and Perspective Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Xu, Jin & Kanyingi, Peter Kairu & Wang, Keyou & Li, Guojie & Han, Bei & Jiang, Xiuchen, 2017. "Probabilistic small signal stability analysis with large scale integration of wind power considering dependence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1258-1270.
    16. Liu, Jiejie & Li, Yao & Ma, Yanan & Qin, Ruomu & Meng, Xianyang & Wu, Jiangtao, 2023. "Two-layer multiple scenario optimization framework for integrated energy system based on optimal energy contribution ratio strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    17. Asaad Mohammad & Ramon Zamora & Tek Tjing Lie, 2020. "Integration of Electric Vehicles in the Distribution Network: A Review of PV Based Electric Vehicle Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Hao, Junhong & Feng, Xiaolong & Chen, Xiangru & Jin, Xilin & Wang, Xingce & Hao, Tong & Hong, Feng & Du, Xiaoze, 2024. "Optimal scheduling of active distribution network considering symmetric heat and power source-load spatial-temporal characteristics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    19. Jin, S.W. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Nie, S., 2018. "Analyzing the performance of clean development mechanism for electric power systems under uncertain environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 382-397.
    20. Ben Christopher, S.J. & Carolin Mabel, M., 2020. "A bio-inspired approach for probabilistic energy management of micro-grid incorporating uncertainty in statistical cost estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:323:y:2025:i:c:s0360544225014550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.