IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v194y2020ics0360544220300323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and uncertainty analysis of radionuclide atmospheric dispersion modeling codes based on Gaussian plume model

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Bo
  • Cui, Weijie
  • Chen, Chao
  • Chen, Yixue

Abstract

It is necessary to assess the radiological consequences of radioactive leakage accident in the planning and operation of a nuclear power plant, especially an atmospheric radioactive material spill that has a rapid and broad impact on public health. Uncertainty analysis of the assessment results will help to reduce the probability of making mistakes in the emergency response after accident. The Gaussian plume model is the most widely used computational model for atmospheric diffusion assessment. Based on this model, the FORTRAN computer language is used to compile Radionuclides Atmosphere Dispersion Codes (RADC). Calculation results based on RADC are compared with HotSpot Health Physics Codes to verify its calculation accuracy. Based on the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, uncertainty of the Gaussian plume model is analysed, and the influence of observation error on the confidence interval is calculated. The results show that the greater the air concentration of radioactivity, the wider the confidence interval; the observation error has a great impact on the confidence interval. Meanwhile, the small observation error will cause a large change in the width of the confidence interval.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Bo & Cui, Weijie & Chen, Chao & Chen, Yixue, 2020. "Development and uncertainty analysis of radionuclide atmospheric dispersion modeling codes based on Gaussian plume model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300323
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220300323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.116925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raillon, L. & Ghiaus, C., 2018. "An efficient Bayesian experimental calibration of dynamic thermal models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 818-833.
    2. Wang, Xiaojing & Zou, Zhengping, 2019. "Uncertainty analysis of impact of geometric variations on turbine blade performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 67-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuqi & Du, Qiuwan & Li, Yunzhu & Zhang, Di & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Field reconstruction and off-design performance prediction of turbomachinery in energy systems based on deep learning techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    2. Li, Jinxing & Liu, Tianyuan & Zhu, Guangya & Li, Yunzhu & Xie, Yonghui, 2023. "Uncertainty quantification and aerodynamic robust optimization of turbomachinery based on graph learning methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Na, Wei & Wang, Mingming, 2022. "A Bayesian approach with urban-scale energy model to calibrate building energy consumption for space heating: A case study of application in Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Tohme, Tony & Vanslette, Kevin & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2020. "A generalized Bayesian approach to model calibration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Hou, D. & Hassan, I.G. & Wang, L., 2021. "Review on building energy model calibration by Bayesian inference," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Kumar, Dinesh & Bahauddin Alam, Syed & Ridwan, Tuhfatur & Goodwin, Cameron S., 2021. "Quantitative risk assessment of a high power density small modular reactor (SMR) core using uncertainty and sensitivity analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Wang, Qi & Yang, Li & Rao, Yu, 2021. "Establishment of a generalizable model on a small-scale dataset to predict the surface pressure distribution of gas turbine blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Gatt, Damien & Yousif, Charles & Cellura, Maurizio & Camilleri, Liberato & Guarino, Francesco, 2020. "Assessment of building energy modelling studies to meet the requirements of the new Energy Performance of Buildings Directive," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Kumar, Manoj & Behera, Suraj K. & Kumar, Amitesh & Sahoo, Ranjit K., 2019. "Numerical and experimental investigation to visualize the fluid flow and thermal characteristics of a cryogenic turboexpander," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Nakhchi, M.E. & Naung, S. Win & Rahmati, M., 2022. "Influence of blade vibrations on aerodynamic performance of axial compressor in gas turbine: Direct numerical simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Mahdi Erfanian Nakhchi & Shine Win Naung & Mohammad Rahmati, 2023. "Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow over Low-Pressure Turbine Blades with Aeroelastic Vibrations and Inflow Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Massimiliano Manfren & Maurizio Sibilla & Lamberto Tronchin, 2021. "Energy Modelling and Analytics in the Built Environment—A Review of Their Role for Energy Transitions in the Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Moriguchi, Shota & Miyazawa, Hironori & Furusawa, Takashi & Yamamoto, Satoru, 2021. "Large eddy simulation of a linear turbine cascade with a trailing edge cutback," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Li, Jinxing & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Yuqi & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Integrated graph deep learning framework for flow field reconstruction and performance prediction of turbomachinery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    15. Lukas Lundström & Jan Akander, 2019. "Bayesian Calibration with Augmented Stochastic State-Space Models of District-Heated Multifamily Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto & Tronchin, Lamberto & Groppi, Daniele & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis and energy modelling as a key enablers for smart energy services and technologies in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. McKeand, Austin M. & Gorguluarslan, Recep M. & Choi, Seung-Kyum, 2021. "Stochastic analysis and validation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:194:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220300323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.