IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v118y2017icp1256-1263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methane enhancement and asynchronism minimization through co-digestion of goose manure and NaOH solubilized corn stover with waste activated sludge

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan, Muhammad
  • Ding, Weimin
  • Umar, Muhammad
  • Hei, Kunlun
  • Bi, Jinhua
  • Shi, Zhendan

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of corn stover (CS) and goose manure (GM) was carried out in the present study at four composition levels. Corn stover was pretreated to enhance its lignocellulosic digestibility. The NaOH pretreatment effect on the chemical composition of the corn stover was also determined and the methane production from all the composition levels was found significant (P < 0.05) as compared with the control. The cumulative methane production of treatment C2 (0.6 CS: 0.4 GM), C3 (0.4 CS: 0.6 GM) and C4 (0.2 CS: 0.8 GM) were 86.1%, 92.1% and 83.1% enhanced as compared with the control respectively. On the basis of the experimental results, it was concluded that a C/N ratio between 20 and 30 was found optimum to enhance methane production. Asynchronism minimization was observed for all the treatments. Process chemistry of the whole co-digestion process like total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs), alcohol production pattern, pH, soluble chemical oxygen demand (CODs), total available ammonia (TAN) and free available ammonia (FAN) were deeply monitored.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Umar, Muhammad & Hei, Kunlun & Bi, Jinhua & Shi, Zhendan, 2017. "Methane enhancement and asynchronism minimization through co-digestion of goose manure and NaOH solubilized corn stover with waste activated sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1256-1263.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:118:y:2017:i:c:p:1256-1263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216315961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parimi, Naga Sirisha & Singh, Manjinder & Kastner, James R. & Das, Keshav C., 2015. "Biomethane and biocrude oil production from protein extracted residual Spirulina platensis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 697-704.
    2. Yang, Tianxue & Li, Yingjun & Gao, Jixi & Huang, Caihong & Chen, Bin & Zhang, Lieyu & Wang, Xiaowei & Zhao, Ying & Xi, Beidou & Li, Xiang, 2015. "Performance of dry anaerobic technology in the co-digestion of rural organic solid wastes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2497-2502.
    3. Krishania, M. & Vijay, V.K. & Chandra, R., 2013. "Methane fermentation and kinetics of wheat straw pretreated substrates co-digested with cattle manure in batch assay," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 359-367.
    4. Dong, Feiqing & Lu, Jianbo, 2013. "Using solar energy to enhance biogas production from livestock residue – A case study of the Tongren biogas engineering pig farm in South China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 759-765.
    5. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    6. Akbulut, Abdullah, 2012. "Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat generation from farm-scale biogas plant: Çiçekdağı case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 381-390.
    7. Mönch-Tegeder, Matthias & Lemmer, Andreas & Oechsner, Hans, 2014. "Enhancement of methane production with horse manure supplement and pretreatment in a full-scale biogas process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 523-530.
    8. Zhou, Shuxia & Zhang, Yulin & Dong, Yuping, 2012. "Pretreatment for biogas production by anaerobic fermentation of mixed corn stover and cow dung," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 644-648.
    9. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T. & Kumar, R., 2012. "Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 273-282.
    10. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Mavris, Vassilis, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2147-2160.
    11. Whiting, Andrew & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 181-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, YuQian & Liu, ChunMei & Wachemo, Akiber Chufo & Li, XiuJin, 2018. "Effects of liquid fraction of digestate recirculation on system performance and microbial community structure during serial anaerobic digestion of completely stirred tank reactors for corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 309-317.
    2. Zhou, Jialiang & Zhang, Yuanhui & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na, 2021. "Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    3. Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Amin, Farrukh Raza & Zhang, Han & Dai, Zhuangqiang & Chen, Chang & Liu, Guangqing, 2020. "Biomethane production characteristics, kinetic analysis, and energy potential of different paper wastes in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1081-1088.
    4. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Liu, Chun Mei & Wachemo, Akiber Chufo & Yuan, Hai Rong & Zou, De Xun & Liu, Yan Ping & Zhang, Liang & Pang, Yun Zhi & Li, Xiu Jin, 2018. "Evaluation of methane yield using acidogenic effluent of NaOH pretreated corn stover in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 224-233.
    6. Mohd Yasin, Nazlina Haiza & Ikegami, Azusa & Wood, Thomas K. & Yu, Chang-Ping & Haruyama, Tetsuya & Takriff, Mohd Sobri & Maeda, Toshinari, 2017. "Oceans as bioenergy pools for methane production using activated methanogens in waste sewage sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 399-407.
    7. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Myczko, Renata & Myczko, Andrzej, 2018. "Technological and energetic evaluation of maize stover silage for methane production on technical scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 903-912.
    8. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Ratajczak, Izabela & Goliński, Piotr & Janczak, Damian & Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka & Szentner, Kinga & Woźniak, Magdalena, 2020. "Chemical composition of maize stover fraction versus methane yield and energy value in fermentation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    2. Rouches, E. & Herpoël-Gimbert, I. & Steyer, J.P. & Carrere, H., 2016. "Improvement of anaerobic degradation by white-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 179-198.
    3. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    4. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    5. Hassan, Muhammad & Umar, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Mehryar, Esmaeil & Zhao, Chao, 2017. "Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and oxidative cleaved wheat straw: Stability performance and kinetic modeling perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2314-2320.
    6. Orive, M. & Cebrián, M. & Zufía, J., 2016. "Techno-economic anaerobic co-digestion feasibility study for two-phase olive oil mill pomace and pig slurry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 532-540.
    7. Melts, Indrek & Heinsoo, Katrin & Nurk, Liina & Pärn, Linnar, 2013. "Comparison of two different bioenergy production options from late harvested biomass of Estonian semi-natural grasslands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 6-12.
    8. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Moreira, Maria Teresa, 2017. "The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1130-1143.
    9. Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Kasinath, Archana & Fudala-Ksiazek, Sylwia & Szopinska, Malgorzata & Bylinski, Hubert & Artichowicz, Wojciech & Remiszewska-Skwarek, Anna & Luczkiewicz, Aneta, 2021. "Biomass in biogas production: Pretreatment and codigestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Teymoori Hamzehkolaei, Fatemeh & Amjady, Nima, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 602-614.
    12. Grosser, Anna, 2018. "Determination of methane potential of mixtures composed of sewage sludge, organic fraction of municipal waste and grease trap sludge using biochemical methane potential assays. A comparison of BMP tes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 488-499.
    13. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Solé-Bundó, Maria & Passos, Fabiana & Romero-Güiza, Maycoll S. & Ferrer, Ivet & Astals, Sergi, 2019. "Co-digestion strategies to enhance microalgae anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 471-482.
    15. Yang, Liangcheng & Xu, Fuqing & Ge, Xumeng & Li, Yebo, 2015. "Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 824-834.
    16. Dong, Feiqing & Lu, Jianbo, 2013. "Using solar energy to enhance biogas production from livestock residue – A case study of the Tongren biogas engineering pig farm in South China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 759-765.
    17. Karthik Rajendran & Solmaz Aslanzadeh & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2012. "Household Biogas Digesters—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-32, August.
    18. Ma, Chaonan & Liu, Jianyong & Ye, Min & Zou, Lianpei & Qian, Guangren & Li, Yu-You, 2018. "Towards utmost bioenergy conversion efficiency of food waste: Pretreatment, co-digestion, and reactor type," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 700-709.
    19. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Myczko, Renata & Myczko, Andrzej, 2018. "Technological and energetic evaluation of maize stover silage for methane production on technical scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 903-912.
    20. Couras, C.S. & Louros, V.L. & Grilo, A.M. & Leitão, J.H. & Capela, M.I. & Arroja, L.M. & Nadais, M.H., 2014. "Effects of operational shocks on key microbial populations for biogas production in UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 866-874.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:118:y:2017:i:c:p:1256-1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.