IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v148y2021ipas0301421520305000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing carbon dioxide emissions beyond 2030: Time to shift U.S. power-sector focus

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Jeffrey
  • Rode, David
  • Zhai, Haibo
  • Fischbeck, Paul

Abstract

Despite the impending withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and the replacement of Obama's Clean Power Plan (CPP) with Trump's Affordable Clean Energy rule, the carbon-dioxide (CO2) emission-reduction targets set as the contribution of the U.S. power sector to meet the Agreement goal appear likely to be met. Using data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration's Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) reports, we evaluate the impact of projected natural gas prices on these emissions. We find that while lower natural gas prices have historically resulted in lower CO2 emissions, the projections from the 2017 and 2019 AEOs differ dramatically in both the projected gas price and the associated impact on CO2 reduction. This change in the marginal emission-reduction rate relative to the natural gas price coincides with decreasing capital costs for solar and wind generation sources. As such, the contribution of the power sector to the Paris Agreement targets for 2020 and 2025, and the CPP 2030 target may be meet as early as 2020. With fulfillment of the shorter-term reduction targets now at hand without additional U.S. legislative or regulatory action, policy analysis should turn toward the strategies required to meet the longer-term, deeper-reduction targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Jeffrey & Rode, David & Zhai, Haibo & Fischbeck, Paul, 2021. "Reducing carbon dioxide emissions beyond 2030: Time to shift U.S. power-sector focus," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:148:y:2021:i:pa:s0301421520305000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421520305000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:148:y:2021:i:pa:s0301421520305000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.