IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v327y2025i2p491-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fair and profitable even when serving different customer classes: How pricing and lead-time quotation can help

Author

Listed:
  • Dede, Sinan
  • Balcıog̃lu, Barış

Abstract

In this paper, we model a production/inventory system serving two classes of customers with a single type of product. Demand from each class depends on the price and the lead-time quoted. One class comprises customers sensitive to delays who are willing to pay higher prices for shorter lead times. Customers of the other class are price sensitive who can tolerate waiting longer for product delivery if they are charged lower prices. By modeling the system as an Mn/M/1 type make-to-stock queue, we propose four fair policies. These fair policies assure that customers are charged lower prices when they are quoted longer lead times and a high proportion of the deliveries is made during the quoted lead times. Two FCFS (first-come, first-served) policies ignore class differences. Two multilevel rationing (MR) policies prioritize the delay-sensitive class over the other. While determining the price and the lead-time, the refined FCFS and MR policies additionally consider the order in which a customer enters the queue. With a numerical study, we explore when the MR policies taking customer differences into consideration are more profitable than the FCFS policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dede, Sinan & Balcıog̃lu, Barış, 2025. "Fair and profitable even when serving different customer classes: How pricing and lead-time quotation can help," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(2), pages 491-499.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:2:p:491-499
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725004187
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:327:y:2025:i:2:p:491-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.