IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v256y2017i2p384-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximation algorithms for the workload partition problem and applications to scheduling with variable processing times

Author

Listed:
  • Oron, Daniel
  • Shabtay, Dvir
  • Steiner, George

Abstract

In the Workload Partition Problem(WPP) we are given a set of n jobs to be scheduled on a set of m identical parallel machines. Each job has its own workload and the scheduling cost on each machine is a convex function of the total workload of the jobs assigned to it. The objective is to minimize the total cost on the set of m machines. Shabtay and Kaspi (2006) showed that the WPP is equivalent to a scheduling problem on m identical machines with controllable processing times and with the scheduling criterion of minimizing the makespan. They also proved that the WPP is NP-hard when m=2. However, they left as an open question whether the problem is ordinary or strongly NP-hard. Moreover, they provided no practical tools to solve the problem. We bridge those gaps in the literature by showing that the WWP problem is strongly NP-hard when m is part of the input. Furthermore, we present two different approximation algorithms for solving the WWP problem. The first one is a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for a fixed number of machines, while the second is a modification of the well-known longest processing time (LPT) heuristic. We show that our modified LPT heuristic guarantees a solution with a constant approximation ratio, whose value depends on the instance parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Oron, Daniel & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2017. "Approximation algorithms for the workload partition problem and applications to scheduling with variable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 384-391.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:256:y:2017:i:2:p:384-391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716305215
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shabtay, Dvir & Kaspi, Moshe, 2006. "Parallel machine scheduling with a convex resource consumption function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 92-107, August.
    2. Clyde L. Monma & Alexander Schrijver & Michael J. Todd & Victor K. Wei, 1990. "Convex Resource Allocation Problems on Directed Acyclic Graphs: Duality, Complexity, Special Cases, and Extensions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 736-748, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biber Nurit & Mor Baruch & Schlissel Yitzhak & Shapira Dana, 2023. "Lot scheduling involving completion time problems on identical parallel machines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2022. "Single-machine scheduling with resource-dependent processing times and multiple unavailability periods," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 191-202, April.
    2. Kailiang Xu & Zuren Feng & Liangjun Ke, 2010. "A branch and bound algorithm for scheduling jobs with controllable processing times on a single machine to meet due dates," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 303-324, December.
    3. Kailiang Xu & Zuren Feng & Liangjun Ke, 2011. "Single machine scheduling with total tardiness criterion and convex controllable processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 383-391, June.
    4. Liu Guiqing & Li Kai & Cheng Bayi, 2015. "Preemptive Scheduling with Controllable Processing Times on Parallel Machines," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 68-76, February.
    5. Shabtay, Dvir, 2022. "Single-machine scheduling with machine unavailability periods and resource dependent processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 423-439.
    6. Dvir Shabtay & Moshe Kaspi, 2006. "Minimizing the makespan in open‐shop scheduling problems with a convex resource consumption function," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 204-216, April.
    7. Shabtay, Dvir & Zofi, Moshe, 2018. "Single machine scheduling with controllable processing times and an unavailability period to minimize the makespan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 191-200.
    8. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.
    9. Lu Liu & Jian-Jun Wang & Xiao-Yuan Wang, 2016. "Single machine due-window assignment scheduling with resource-dependent processing times to minimise total resource consumption cost," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1186-1195, February.
    10. Laslo, Zohar & Keren, Baruch & Ilani, Hagai, 2008. "Minimizing task completion time with the execution set method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1513-1519, June.
    11. Alexander Kononov & Yulia Zakharova, 2022. "Speed scaling scheduling of multiprocessor jobs with energy constraint and makespan criterion," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 539-564, July.
    12. Oron, Daniel, 2016. "Scheduling controllable processing time jobs with position-dependent workloads," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 153-160.
    13. Shaojun Lu & Min Kong & Zhiping Zhou & Xinbao Liu & Siwen Liu, 2022. "A hybrid metaheuristic for a semiconductor production scheduling problem with deterioration effect and resource constraints," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5405-5440, November.
    14. Selvi, Omer & Gokbayrak, Kagan, 2010. "A search method for optimal control of a flow shop system of traditional machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 325-331, September.
    15. Györgyi, Péter & Kis, Tamás, 2017. "Approximation schemes for parallel machine scheduling with non-renewable resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 113-123.
    16. Hongyu He & Mengqi Liu & Ji-Bo Wang, 2017. "Resource constrained scheduling with general truncated job-dependent learning effect," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 626-644, February.
    17. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    18. Bahram Alidaee & Haibo Wang & R. Bryan Kethley & Frank Landram, 2019. "A unified view of parallel machine scheduling with interdependent processing rates," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 499-515, October.
    19. Zong-Jun Wei & Li-Yan Wang & Lei Zhang & Ji-Bo Wang & Ershen Wang, 2023. "Single-Machine Maintenance Activity Scheduling with Convex Resource Constraints and Learning Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Shabtay, Dvir & Kaspi, Moshe, 2006. "Parallel machine scheduling with a convex resource consumption function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 92-107, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:256:y:2017:i:2:p:384-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.