IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v201y2010i1p289-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-block scheduling with priority for radiotherapy treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Conforti, D.
  • Guerriero, F.
  • Guido, R.

Abstract

In this paper, a quite challenging operational problem within health care delivery has been considered: the optimal management of patients waiting for radiotherapy treatments. Long waiting times for radiotherapy treatments of several cancers are largely documented all over the world. This problem is mainly due to an imbalance between supply and demand of radiotherapy services, which negatively affects the effectiveness and the efficiency of the health care delivered. Within this context, the paper presents an innovative solution approach for effectively scheduling a set of patients waiting to start the radiotherapy plan. The proposed approach is based on a well tailored integer linear optimization program, modelling a non-block scheduling strategy, with the aim to minimize the mean waiting time or maximize the number of new scheduled patients. The model has been tested and evaluated by carrying out some numerical experiments on suitable use-case scenarios, and the obtained results demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Conforti, D. & Guerriero, F. & Guido, R., 2010. "Non-block scheduling with priority for radiotherapy treatments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 289-296, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:1:p:289-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(09)00077-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Dinh-Nguyen & Klinkert, Andreas, 2008. "Surgical case scheduling as a generalized job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1011-1025, March.
    2. Cheang, B. & Li, H. & Lim, A. & Rodrigues, B., 2003. "Nurse rostering problems--a bibliographic survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 447-460, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Ma & Antoine Sauré & Martin L. Puterman & Marianne Taylor & Scott Tyldesley, 2016. "Capacity planning and appointment scheduling for new patient oncology consults," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 347-361, December.
    2. H. Romero & N. Dellaert & S. Geer & M. Frunt & M. Jansen-Vullers & G. Krekels, 2013. "Admission and capacity planning for the implementation of one-stop-shop in skin cancer treatment using simulation-based optimization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 75-86, March.
    3. Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan & Tyldesley, Scott & Puterman, Martin L., 2012. "Dynamic multi-appointment patient scheduling for radiation therapy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 573-584.
    4. repec:kap:hcarem:v:20:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10729-016-9354-6 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    6. Antoine Legrain & Marie-Andrée Fortin & Nadia Lahrichi & Louis-Martin Rousseau, 2015. "Online stochastic optimization of radiotherapy patient scheduling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 110-123, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:201:y:2010:i:1:p:289-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.