IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v175y2006i3p1616-1627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A time-space network based exact optimization model for multi-depot bus scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Kliewer, Natalia
  • Mellouli, Taieb
  • Suhl, Leena

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kliewer, Natalia & Mellouli, Taieb & Suhl, Leena, 2006. "A time-space network based exact optimization model for multi-depot bus scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1616-1627, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:175:y:2006:i:3:p:1616-1627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(05)00227-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauro Dell'Amico & Matteo Fischetti & Paolo Toth, 1993. "Heuristic Algorithms for the Multiple Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 115-125, January.
    2. Celso C. Ribeiro & François Soumis, 1994. "A Column Generation Approach to the Multiple-Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 41-52, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kulkarni, Sarang & Krishnamoorthy, Mohan & Ranade, Abhiram & Ernst, Andreas T. & Patil, Rahul, 2018. "A new formulation and a column generation-based heuristic for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 457-487.
    2. Timo Gschwind & Stefan Irnich & Simon Emde & Christian Tilk, 2018. "Branch-Cut-and-Price for the Scheduling Deliveries with Time Windows in a Direct Shipping Network," Working Papers 1805, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    3. Perumal, Shyam S.G. & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper, 2022. "Electric bus planning & scheduling: A review of related problems and methodologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 395-413.
    4. Timo Gschwind & Stefan Irnich & Christian Tilk & Simon Emde, 2020. "Branch-cut-and-price for scheduling deliveries with time windows in a direct shipping network," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 363-377, June.
    5. Andreas Löbel, 1998. "Vehicle Scheduling in Public Transit and Lagrangean Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-1), pages 1637-1649, December.
    6. Knut Haase & Guy Desaulniers & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Simultaneous Vehicle and Crew Scheduling in Urban Mass Transit Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 286-303, August.
    7. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Tian, Xiaopeng, 2018. "Coordinating assignment and routing decisions in transit vehicle schedules: A variable-splitting Lagrangian decomposition approach for solution symmetry breaking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 70-101.
    8. Ricard, Léa & Desaulniers, Guy & Lodi, Andrea & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2024. "Increasing schedule reliability in the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem with stochastic travel time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Chris Martin & David Jones & Pinar Keskinocak, 2003. "Optimizing On-Demand Aircraft Schedules for Fractional Aircraft Operators," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 22-35, October.
    10. Uçar, Ezgi & İlker Birbil, Ş. & Muter, İbrahim, 2017. "Managing disruptions in the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 249-269.
    11. Desaulniers, Guy & Lavigne, June & Soumis, Francois, 1998. "Multi-depot vehicle scheduling problems with time windows and waiting costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 479-494, December.
    12. Sundararajan Arunapuram & Kamlesh Mathur & Daniel Solow, 2003. "Vehicle Routing and Scheduling with Full Truckloads," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 170-182, May.
    13. Matteo Fischetti & Andrea Lodi & Silvano Martello & Paolo Toth, 2001. "A Polyhedral Approach to Simplified Crew Scheduling and Vehicle Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 833-850, June.
    14. Ciancio, Claudio & Laganà, Demetrio & Musmanno, Roberto & Santoro, Francesco, 2018. "An integrated algorithm for shift scheduling problems for local public transport companies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 139-153.
    15. Richard Freling & Albert P. M. Wagelmans & José M. Pinto Paixão, 2001. "Models and Algorithms for Single-Depot Vehicle Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 165-180, May.
    16. Ahmed Hadjar & Odile Marcotte & François Soumis, 2006. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for the Multiple Depot Vehicle Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 130-149, February.
    17. Wang, Dian & D’Ariano, Andrea & Zhao, Jun & Zhan, Shuguang & Peng, Qiyuan, 2024. "Joint rolling stock rotation planning and depot deadhead scheduling in complicated urban rail transit lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 665-684.
    18. Van der Perre, Peter P. G. & Van Oudheusden, Dirk D. L., 1997. "Reducing depot-related costs of large bus operators a case study in Bangkok," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 45-53, January.
    19. Enzi, Miriam & Parragh, Sophie N. & Pisinger, David & Prandtstetter, Matthias, 2021. "Modeling and solving the multimodal car- and ride-sharing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 290-303.
    20. Benchimol, Pascal & Desaulniers, Guy & Desrosiers, Jacques, 2012. "Stabilized dynamic constraint aggregation for solving set partitioning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 360-371.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:175:y:2006:i:3:p:1616-1627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.