IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v148y2003i2p410-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fully subjective approach to modelling inspection maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Apeland, S.
  • Scarf, P. A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Apeland, S. & Scarf, P. A., 2003. "A fully subjective approach to modelling inspection maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 410-425, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:148:y:2003:i:2:p:410-425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(02)00356-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, W., 1997. "Subjective estimation of the delay time distribution in maintenance modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 516-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Selvik, J.T. & Aven, T., 2011. "A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 324-331.
    2. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    3. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    4. Ferreira, Rodrigo J.P. & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2009. "A multi-criteria decision model to determine inspection intervals of condition monitoring based on delay time analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 905-912.
    5. M Al-Marsumi, 2005. "Modelling some aspects of the maintenance management of the working refractory lining of small electric arc furnaces in the steel industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 275-285, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    2. A Zuashkiani & D Banjevic & A K S Jardine, 2009. "Estimating parameters of proportional hazards model based on expert knowledge and statistical data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1621-1636, December.
    3. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    4. T Bedford & B M Alkali, 2009. "Competing risks and opportunistic informative maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(4), pages 363-372, December.
    5. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    6. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    7. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Lee, Hyunju, 2020. "An study of cost effective maintenance policies: Age replacement versus replacement after N minimal repairs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Kerres,, Bertrand & Fischer, Katharina & Madlener, Reinhard, 2014. "Economic Evaluation of Maintenance Strategies for Wind Turbines: A Stochastic Analysis," FCN Working Papers 3/2014, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    9. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2018. "Conditional inspection and maintenance of a system with two interacting components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 533-544.
    10. Philip A. Scarf & Mohammed Deara, 2003. "Block replacement policies for a two‐component system with failure dependence," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(1), pages 70-87, February.
    11. M J Carr & A H Christer, 2003. "Incorporating the potential for human error in maintenance models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(12), pages 1249-1253, December.
    12. Yu-Cheng Tang & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2005. "Application and Development of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Capital Investment Study," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 1(2), pages 207-230, July.
    13. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:148:y:2003:i:2:p:410-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.