IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v12y2015icp137-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links

Author

Listed:
  • Suich, Helen
  • Howe, Caroline
  • Mace, Georgina

Abstract

We present the results of a review of the empirical evidence and of the state of knowledge regarding the mechanisms linking ecosystem services and poverty alleviation. The review was undertaken to determine the state of current knowledge about the scale and nature of these linkages, and focus the future research agenda. Research has, to date, focussed largely on provisioning services, and on just two poverty dimensions concerning income and assets, and food security and nutrition. While many papers describe links between ecosystem services and dimensions of poverty, few provide sufficient context to enable a thorough understanding of the poverty alleviation impacts (positive or negative), if any. These papers contribute to the accumulating evidence that ecosystem services support well-being, and perhaps prevent people becoming poorer, but provide little evidence of their contribution to poverty alleviation, let alone poverty elimination. A considerable gap remains in understanding the links between ecosystem services and poverty, how change occurs, and how pathways out of poverty may be achieved based on the sustainable utilisation of ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Suich, Helen & Howe, Caroline & Mace, Georgina, 2015. "Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A review of the empirical links," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 137-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:12:y:2015:i:c:p:137-147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000236
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ninan, K.N. & Inoue, Makoto, 2013. "Valuing forest ecosystem services: What we know and what we don't," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 137-149.
    2. Ottaviani, D. & Ji, Li & Pastore, G., 2003. "A multidimensional approach to understanding agro-ecosystems. A case study in Hubei Province, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 207-225, April.
    3. John Kusimi & James Dika, 2012. "Sea erosion at Ada Foah: assessment of impacts and proposed mitigation measures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 983-997, November.
    4. Villasante, Sebastián & Rodríguez, David & Antelo, Manel & Quaas, Martin & Österblom, Henrik, 2012. "The Global Seafood Market Performance Index: A theoretical proposal and potential empirical applications," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 142-152, January.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Ricketts, Taylor H. & Kremen, Claire & Carney, Karen & Swinton, Scott M., 2007. "Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 253-260, December.
    6. Kerr, John, 2002. "Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1387-1400, August.
    7. repec:eee:ecoser:v:7:y:2014:i:c:p:34-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Abson, D.J. & von Wehrden, H. & Baumgärtner, S. & Fischer, J. & Hanspach, J. & Härdtle, W. & Heinrichs, H. & Klein, A.M. & Lang, D.J. & Martens, P. & Walmsley, D., 2014. "Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 29-37.
    9. Hengsdijk, Huib & Guanghuo, Wang & Van den Berg, Marrit M. & Jiangdi, Wang & Wolf, Joost & Changhe, Lu & Roetter, Reimund P. & Van Keulen, Herman, 2007. "Poverty and biodiversity trade-offs in rural development: A case study for Pujiang county, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 851-861, June.
    10. Bruce Lankford & Catherine Pringle & Chris Dickens & Fonda Lewis & Myles Mander & Vasudha Chhotray & Marisa Goulden & Zibonele Nxele & Leo Quayle, 2011. "Hydrological modelling of water allocation, ecosystem services and poverty alleviation in the Pongola floodplain, South Africa," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 1237-1260, February.
    11. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    12. repec:eee:ecoser:v:2:y:2012:i:c:p:56-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Borner, Jan & Mendoza, Arisbe & Vosti, Stephen A., 2007. "Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 356-373, December.
    14. Liebenow, Danielle King & Cohen, Matthew J. & Gumbricht, Thomas & Shepherd, Keith D. & Shepherd, Gemma, 2012. "Do ecosystem services influence household wealth in rural Mali?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 33-44.
    15. La Rovere, R. & Hiernaux, P. & Van Keulen, H. & Schiere, J. B. & Szonyi, J. A., 2005. "Co-evolutionary scenarios of intensification and privatization of resource use in rural communities of south-western Niger," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 251-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:294-305 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pb:p:165-174 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:eee:wodepe:v:7-8:y:2017:i::p:43-60 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:eee:ecoser:v:33:y:2018:i:pa:p:89-101 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pa:p:91-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:265-273 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eee:ecoser:v:35:y:2019:i:c:p:52-66 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:eee:forpol:v:84:y:2017:i:c:p:112-119 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Selomane, Odirilwe & Reyers, Belinda & Biggs, Reinette & Tallis, Heather & Polasky, Stephen, 2015. "Towards integrated social–ecological sustainability indicators: Exploring the contribution and gaps in existing global data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 140-146.
    10. Asian Development Bank Institute, 2017. "Eradicating Poverty and Promoting Prosperity in a Changing Asia-Pacific," Working Papers id:11706, eSocialSciences.
    11. Anriquez, G. & Toledo, G. & Arriagada, R., 2018. "Hidden Welfare Effects of Tree Plantations," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277284, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. repec:eee:ecolec:v:157:y:2019:i:c:p:312-320 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:eee:agisys:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:60-71 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Lorenza Campagnolo & Fabio Eboli & Marinella Davide, 2016. "Can Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assesment of climate-sustainabilty co-benefits or side-effects," EcoMod2016 9635, EcoMod.
    15. repec:eee:ecolec:v:144:y:2018:i:c:p:100-111 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:eee:ecoser:v:21:y:2016:i:pa:p:81-91 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:12:y:2015:i:c:p:137-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.