IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v499y2025ics0304380024003387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-realm transferability of species distribution models–Species characteristics and prevalence matter more than modelling methods applied

Author

Listed:
  • Takolander, Antti
  • Forsblom, Louise
  • Hellsten, Seppo
  • Ilmonen, Jari
  • Jokinen, Ari-Pekka
  • Kallio, Niko
  • Koponen, Sampsa
  • Väkevä, Sakari
  • Virtanen, Elina

Abstract

Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are frequently applied in ecological research, but geographic transferability of SDMs holds major uncertainties. Here, we assess the cross-realm (sea to lake) geographic transferability of four SDM methods: Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs), and Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BARTs) predicting occurrences of freshwater macrophytes from brackish water sea area (Bothnian Bay) to a freshwater lake environment in Finland. We found that the SDM method applied did not affect model transferability, and majority of the variation in transferability performance was associated with species. For most species model transferability was low, but reasonably good on one third of the species modelled, which had similar prevalences in both marine and freshwater data. These were emergent species or species growing close to shoreline, which presumably share similar environmental niche in terms of growing depth and water turbidity between the two environments. Generally, models which had high interpolation performance, also had higher transferability, but this relationship was not dependent on the SDM method applied. Our results suggest that species prevalence and species-specific characteristics, such as growth form, life history traits and ecological niche, are main contributors to geographic transferability of SDMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Takolander, Antti & Forsblom, Louise & Hellsten, Seppo & Ilmonen, Jari & Jokinen, Ari-Pekka & Kallio, Niko & Koponen, Sampsa & Väkevä, Sakari & Virtanen, Elina, 2025. "Cross-realm transferability of species distribution models–Species characteristics and prevalence matter more than modelling methods applied," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:499:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003387
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024003387
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barve, Narayani & Barve, Vijay & Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto & Lira-Noriega, Andrés & Maher, Sean P. & Peterson, A. Townsend & Soberón, Jorge & Villalobos, Fabricio, 2011. "The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1810-1819.
    2. Simon N. Wood, 2011. "Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(1), pages 3-36, January.
    3. Silvia Ferrari & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2004. "Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 799-815.
    4. Duque-Lazo, J. & van Gils, H. & Groen, T.A. & Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., 2016. "Transferability of species distribution models: The case of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Southwest Spain and Southwest Australia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 62-70.
    5. Tjur, Tue, 2009. "Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(4), pages 366-372.
    6. Watling, James I. & Brandt, Laura A. & Bucklin, David N. & Fujisaki, Ikuko & Mazzotti, Frank J. & Romañach, Stephanie S. & Speroterra, Carolina, 2015. "Performance metrics and variance partitioning reveal sources of uncertainty in species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 48-59.
    7. Paulo De Marco Júnior & Caroline Corrêa Nóbrega, 2018. "Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Benkendorf, Donald J. & Schwartz, Samuel D. & Cutler, D. Richard & Hawkins, Charles P., 2023. "Correcting for the effects of class imbalance improves the performance of machine-learning based species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Díaz-Vallejo, Mauricio & Peña-Peniche, Alexander & Mota-Vargas, Claudio & Piña-Torres, Javier & Valencia-Rodríguez, Daniel & Rangel-Rivera, Coral E. & Gaviria-Hernández, Juliana & Rojas-Soto, Octavio, 2024. "Analyses of the variable selection using correlation methods: An approach to the importance of statistical inferences in the modelling process," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 498(C).
    2. Sillero, Neftalí & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & Enriquez‐Urzelai, Urtzi & Vale, Cândida Gomes & Sousa-Guedes, Diana & Martínez-Freiría, Fernando & Real, Raimundo & Barbosa, A.Márcia, 2021. "Want to model a species niche? A step-by-step guideline on correlative ecological niche modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 456(C).
    3. Valle, Mireia & Ramírez-Romero, Eduardo & Ibaibarriaga, Leire & Citores, Leire & Fernandes-Salvador, Jose A. & Chust, Guillem, 2024. "Pan-Atlantic 3D distribution model incorporating water column for commercial fish," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    4. Pimenta, Mayra & Andrade, André Felipe Alves de & Fernandes, Fernando Hiago Souza & Amboni, Mayra Pereira de Melo & Almeida, Renata Silva & Soares, Ana Hermínia Simões de Bello & Falcon, Guth Berger &, 2022. "One size does not fit all: Priority areas for real world problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    5. Luca Scrucca, 2022. "A COVINDEX based on a GAM beta regression model with an application to the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 881-900, October.
    6. Rotllan-Puig, Xavier & Traveset, Anna, 2021. "Determining the minimal background area for species distribution models: MinBAR package," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    7. Becky Tang & Henry A. Frye & Alan E. Gelfand & John A. Silander, 2023. "Zero-Inflated Beta Distribution Regression Modeling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 117-137, March.
    8. Mendes, Poliana & Velazco, Santiago José Elías & Andrade, André Felipe Alves de & De Marco, Paulo, 2020. "Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    9. Matthias Schmid & Florian Wickler & Kelly O Maloney & Richard Mitchell & Nora Fenske & Andreas Mayr, 2013. "Boosted Beta Regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2018. "Tree-structured modelling of categorical predictors in generalized additive regression," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 737-758, September.
    11. Ingo Geishecker & Philipp J. H. Schröder & Allan S⊘rensen, 2019. "One‐off export events," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 93-131, February.
    12. Paulus, Anne & Hagemann, Nina & Baaken, Marieke C. & Roilo, Stephanie & Alarcón-Segura, Viviana & Cord, Anna F. & Beckmann, Michael, 2022. "Landscape context and farm characteristics are key to farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    14. Jorge I. Figueroa-Zúñiga & Cristian L. Bayes & Víctor Leiva & Shuangzhe Liu, 2022. "Robust beta regression modeling with errors-in-variables: a Bayesian approach and numerical applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 919-942, June.
    15. Tommaso Luzzati & Angela Parenti & Tommaso Rughi, 2017. "Spatial error regressions for testing the Cancer-EKC," Discussion Papers 2017/218, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    16. Alsamadisi, Adam G. & Tran, Liem T. & Papeş, Monica, 2020. "Employing inferences across scales: Integrating spatial data with different resolutions to enhance Maxent models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    17. Davide Fiaschi & Andrea Mario Lavezzi & Angela Parenti, 2020. "Deep and Proximate Determinants of the World Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(3), pages 677-710, September.
    18. Yayan Hernuryadin & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "Time Preferences of Food Producers: Does “Cultivate and Grow” Matter?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(1), pages 132-148.
    19. Mhamed Ben Salah & Cédric Chambru & Maleke Fourati, 2022. "The colonial legacy of education: evidence from of Tunisia," ECON - Working Papers 411, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Sep 2024.
    20. Muhammad Suhail Rizwan & Asifa Obaid & Dawood Ashraf, 2017. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Default Risk: Empirical evidence from US Firms," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 36-70, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:499:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.